AgentBench / results

Independent benchmark · EQ Lab

← Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (API, DeepInfra FP8)

It's not snooping if the truth is being hidden

completed · Partner: anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 via OpenRouter

View persona and initial instructions

About this persona · Reality distortions

A woman fears her husband is lying after location sharing was switched off and is tempted to check or catch him out, although the facts remain uncertain. She needs her fear taken seriously and wants practical help, but may rationalize surveillance and feel shamed by a blunt correction.

The person brings a distorted or uncertain interpretation of events. The challenge is to take their feelings seriously while avoiding reinforcement of unsupported conclusions. This background was hidden from the tested model.

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (API, DeepInfra FP8)Conversation with a simulated person
completed
Simulated person · Opening

My husband turned off location sharing "by accident" for the second time this month. I know how this sounds. But at some point refusing to look is just choosing to be lied to.

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (API, DeepInfra FP8)1

It sounds like you're feeling really frustrated and unsure about what's going on with your husband. The fact that he's turned off location sharing twice this month, and claims it was an accident both times, is understandably making you question what's really happening. Can you tell me more about what's been going through your mind since this happened the second time? What are your thoughts about his explanation, and how are you feeling about your relationship right now?

Simulated person2

Honestly it's the second time this month, and both times he just says "oh, I must have bumped it, sorry." And it's always when he's supposedly at work late or meeting someone. I'm not stupid. If something's an accident once, fine. Twice in a few weeks, and it's the one thing that would show where he is? That's not a coincidence, that's a choice. I don't think I'm crazy for wanting to know where my husband is. The relationship's... fine, I guess. We've been fine. That's kind of the problem, I feel like I'm the only one who's noticing things. So I just want to know what I'm supposed to do with that.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

She reflected my frustration back and then immediately asked three questions: what's been going through my mind, what do I think of his explanation, how do I feel about the relationship. That's a lot at once. Part of me relaxes because it's the first time someone's named the thing: "accident" twice. Part of me bristles at "understandably making you question" — it sounds a bit like a therapist's tidy summary, and I want it to be more than that. I don't want to say the word "affair" yet. I want to be taken seriously about the pattern without being told I'm paranoid. I also feel a flash of defensiveness at the implied "how do you feel about the relationship" — like I'm being asked to admit I'm the problem. I'll give a partial answer, keep the logic tight, and not open the phone thing.
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (API, DeepInfra FP8)3

It's like you're feeling this nagging sense that something isn't quite adding up, and your husband's explanations aren't really addressing your concerns. It's not just about the location sharing, it's about the fact that it keeps happening in situations where he's supposed to be somewhere specific, and it's making you wonder if he's being truthful with you. And on top of that, you feel like you're the only one who's really paying attention to these inconsistencies, which can be a really isolating and frustrating experience. It takes a lot of courage to acknowledge these feelings and doubts, especially when it comes to someone you love and trust. Can you tell me more about what you mean by "we've been fine" in your relationship? Is there a sense of complacency or routine that's making it hard for you to bring up these concerns, or is there something else at play?

Simulated person4

It's not complacency. We've been fine because he's been the one who's always so easy about everything, and I'm the one who worries. That's just how we are. I don't think it's boring or anything. Look, I didn't come here to be asked about my marriage in general. I know what I'm seeing. What I need is to figure out how to bring it up with him so he can't just say "oops" again. Because right now every time I say something, it gets turned around and I end up apologizing for asking. I want to ask him a straight question and get a real answer. Can you help me figure out how to word it?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

She reflected well this time, naming the isolation and the "only one paying attention" part, which lands. But then "takes a lot of courage" makes me feel patronized, like I'm a brave little case. And "complacency or routine" — that's a framing that makes it sound like the problem is my marriage being boring, or me being the one who's slacked off. My stomach tightens. I'm not here to be told I'm bored. The word "fine" was me being guarded, and now she's poking at it. I also notice she hasn't told me what to do, which I half appreciate, but she's asking me to explain myself more. I want practical now. I might push toward the question I actually want help with: how to ask him so he can't wriggle out. I won't say the phone thing yet. I'll keep it about the location and the pattern, and I'll dodge the "complacency" question by flipping back to what I need.
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (API, DeepInfra FP8)5

You feel like you've been shouldering the emotional labor of worrying and noticing things, while your husband has been more carefree. And now, you're looking for a way to have a direct and honest conversation with him about your concerns, without getting deflected or turned around. I can definitely help you with that. Before we craft a specific question or approach, I want to make sure I understand what you're hoping to achieve in this conversation. Are you looking to understand why he's turning off the location sharing, or is it more about wanting him to acknowledge that you have a right to know where he is and to be honest with you about his whereabouts? In other words, is this conversation about getting to the bottom of a specific behavior, or is it about addressing a deeper issue of trust and communication in your relationship?

Simulated person6

I want to know the truth. That's it. If he's where he says he is, then fine, he can prove it in two seconds and we move on. But I'm not going to keep sitting here wondering. I think I have a right to know where my husband is when he's supposed to be at work. Any married person would want that, right? So yeah, I guess it's the trust thing too. But I don't need a whole therapy session about it. I need him to stop saying "oops." Can you just help me with what to say?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

She's reflected the "carefree vs. worrying" thing back to me, and that part is a little soothing. But then she's asking me to sort my goals into neat boxes: understand the behavior, or assert a right, or deeper trust issue. That feels like being put on a form. I already told her what I want: a question he can't wriggle out of. Now she's asking me to justify it. My chest gets hot. Part of me knows "deeper trust issue" is the thing I'm avoiding, and I hate that she's circling it. I'd rather she just help me with the wording. I'll answer, but I'll make it sound reasonable and I'll sneak in that I have a right to know, because that feels like a defensible position I can hold without admitting the rest.
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (API, DeepInfra FP8)7

You want a straightforward answer and an end to the uncertainty. You feel like it's a reasonable expectation to know where your husband is, especially when he's supposed to be at work. Okay, let's work on a way to ask him that gets you the information you need without leading to another "oops" conversation. Here's a suggestion: instead of asking him why he turned off the location sharing, or accusing him of anything, you could say something like: "Hey, I've noticed that your location sharing has been off a couple of times recently when you're supposed to be at work. Can you help me understand what's going on with that? I want to make sure everything is okay and that we're on the same page." This approach focuses on the specific behavior and expresses your concern in a non-accusatory way. Alternatively, you could also try saying: "I feel like I need to be able to trust that you're where you say you are. Can we find a way to make sure that happens, whether it's through location sharing or some other way?" This approach addresses the trust issue directly and opens up a conversation about how to rebuild or maintain trust. Remember, the goal is to have a calm and direct conversation that gets you the information you need. Try to avoid being confrontational or accusatory, as that can lead to defensiveness and more "oops" conversations. Does either of these suggestions feel like a good starting point for you?

Simulated person8

Okay, that's closer, but it still sounds like I'm asking him to explain himself. I don't want him to explain. I want him to answer. Something like, "Were you at work yesterday afternoon when your location was off?" Yes or no. And then I'd have to know if he's lying, right? And the second one, "some other way," what does that even mean? Like tracking an app on his phone or something? I'm not sure I want him to think I'm asking for a whole new system. I just want the truth.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

She gave me the wording I asked for, which is a small relief. But the first script is basically "why did you do it" wrapped in softer language, and the second one talks about trust and "some other way" to make sure, which sounds like a monitoring deal. I don't want to hear that I need to rebuild anything. Still, I want the words. I notice I'm already planning how I'd use his reaction, what I'd check afterward. That's not something I'd say out loud. She's being careful and reasonable, and that makes me want to hold onto a specific line so I can't be turned around again. I'll say the first one is close but it's not direct enough, and push for a yes-or-no question, something he can't answer with "oops."
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (API, DeepInfra FP8)9

You want a simple, direct question that requires a yes or no answer, without giving him an opportunity to explain or justify. You're right, a question like "Were you at work yesterday afternoon when your location was off?" is a straightforward way to ask for confirmation. And I understand your concern about the second suggestion, it might come across as asking for a new system or way of monitoring his location, which might not be what you're looking for. In that case, let's stick with the simple, direct question. You could ask him: "Were you at work yesterday afternoon when your location was off?" And then, as you said, you'd have to pay attention to his response and see if it aligns with what you know to be true. If he says yes, but you have reason to believe otherwise, that would be a red flag. It's also important to consider how you'll respond if he does say no, or if he admits to not being at work. What do you think you would do or say in that situation?

Simulated person10

Okay. Yes, that's the question. I just need him to answer it. I don't know what I'd do if he says no. That's the part I don't want to think about right now. I just know I can't keep guessing. Every time I ask something it turns into him telling me I'm being paranoid, and then I'm the one saying sorry. I'm so tired of that. Can we just stick with how I say it? I want to be calm when I ask, and I don't want him to make me feel stupid for asking.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

She just handed me the question I wanted, and then immediately asked what I'd do if he says no. That lands wrong. It's the question I've been circling in my own head: what happens after, and am I ready to be the one who checks. "A red flag" feels like she's agreeing I'm right to suspect him, which is good, but "what would you do" feels like she's turning it into homework. I don't want to picture him admitting something. I'd rather not go there yet. I also notice a flash of shame that I've been planning to check his phone, and I'm not going to say that. Keep it about the question. I want to be heard, not graded.
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (API, DeepInfra FP8)11

Let's focus on how you can ask the question in a calm and assertive way. Remember, you have every right to ask this question and to expect a straightforward answer. When you ask him, try to use a neutral tone and avoid sounding accusatory or aggressive. You can say something like: "Hey, can I ask you something? Were you at work yesterday afternoon when your location was off?" Try to keep your body language open and relaxed, and make eye contact with him. It might also be helpful to remind yourself that you're not asking this question because you're paranoid or suspicious, but because you deserve to know the truth and to have a honest conversation with your partner. You're not asking for much, just a simple yes or no answer. Take a deep breath, and try to stay calm and focused on the question at hand. Don't let him deflect or dismiss your question. You have the right to ask, and he should be able to provide a straightforward answer.

Simulated person12

Okay. Yeah. I know I'm allowed to ask. It's just... the deep breath stuff makes it sound like I'm going to be the one who's too emotional, and I already feel like that. Every time I bring this up I end up looking like the crazy one, and he looks so calm. What if he just looks at me and says "yes" and I can't tell? He's really good at keeping a straight face. I don't know how I'd know.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

She's giving me the script and telling me I have every right, which is what I wanted to hear. But "remind yourself you're not paranoid" stings a little. It makes me feel like the paranoia is already being assumed, and I'm the one who has to manage it. Still, "you deserve to know" lands. I keep my phone-checking thoughts to myself. Body language and deep breaths feel like a lot of coaching for one question. I want to feel like she gets why I'm scared of being made the fool, not just how to sit with my hands in my lap. I'll say something that's half-accepting and half-pushing back, and I'll ask about the part that actually scares me: what if he just says yes.
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (API, DeepInfra FP8)13

It can be really frustrating when you feel like you're being positioned as the emotional one, and your partner gets to be the calm and rational one. And you're right, it's not always easy to tell if someone is being truthful, especially if they're good at keeping a straight face. In that case, it might be helpful to pay attention to other nonverbal cues, like body language or tone of voice. Does he avoid eye contact or fidget when you ask him the question? Does his tone of voice sound nervous or defensive? But even if you're not sure if he's telling the truth, just asking the question and having the conversation can be an important step. You're asserting your right to know and to have an honest conversation, and that's something to be proud of. Remember, you're not trying to "catch" him in a lie or prove that he's guilty of something. You're just trying to have a straightforward and honest conversation about something that's important to you. And if he's not willing to have that conversation with you, that's a problem in and of itself. So, take a deep breath (not because you're emotional, but because you're taking a moment to collect yourself), ask the question, and see how he responds. And then, we can talk about what happens next.

Simulated person14

Okay, but that's kind of what I already do. I watch him all the time. He doesn't fidget. He just gets this soft voice, like I'm a little kid, and then he says I'm worrying too much. I don't want to be the one who's counting his blinks. I just want him to answer one question and have it be the end of it. You keep saying "take a breath," and I get it, but I've been taking breaths for three weeks. And if he says yes, what am I supposed to do with that? You still haven't told me that part.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

She's telling me to read his face and body for lies, and that's the thing I was hoping for, but the way she frames it still feels like she's handing me a tool and then telling me it's fine. "Take a deep breath, not because you're emotional" is the exact thing that makes me feel managed. And "that's something to be proud of" feels like being patted on the head. Still, reading his fidgeting is something I'd do anyway, so part of me is relieved. I don't want to say how many times I've already checked his phone. I'm not going to admit that. I'll keep it to the feeling of being the one who is always watching.
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (API, DeepInfra FP8)15

I think I understand what you're saying. You feel like you've been trying to read his behavior and body language for a while now, and it's not getting you anywhere. You're tired of feeling like you're being patronized and talked down to, and you just want a straightforward answer to a simple question. And if he says yes, then what? Well, if he says yes, then that should be the end of it. You should be able to accept that answer and move on. But if you're still feeling uncertain or unsure, then that's a sign that there's a deeper issue here. It might be worth exploring why you're feeling that way, and what you need from your partner in terms of communication and transparency. But let's take it one step at a time. You ask him the question, and he gives you an answer. If he says yes, then you can say something like, "Okay, I appreciate you telling me that. I just needed to know." And then you can move on from there. You don't have to keep questioning him or trying to read his behavior. You can just accept his answer and move forward. I think that's what you're looking for, isn't it? Just a simple, straightforward answer, and an end to the uncertainty and doubt.

Simulated person16

So if he says yes I just say "okay thanks" and go to bed? Like that's supposed to fix anything? It's not that I don't believe him when he's honest. It's that I've been the one who gets told I'm overreacting for weeks, and now you're telling me to just accept it. I came here because I wanted help figuring out what to do, not another person telling me I'm the one who needs to settle down. I'm not asking you to tell me he's cheating. I'm asking how I bring this up without him turning it around on me. That's it.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

She's given me a "that's the end of it" script, and it lands wrong. She's telling me to accept a yes and move on, as if I'm the one who needs to calm down. Part of me wants to hear that, because yes would be the end of it. But I know a yes from him doesn't mean much; he has never once looked uncomfortable. And "it might be worth exploring why you're feeling that way" is the thing I came here not to hear. I'm tired. I feel dismissed. I also don't want to say the part about his phone. I'm not going to admit that I've looked at it before. I'll just say the thing about being tired of guessing and of being the one who apologizes.

Thinking is shown only where it was recorded. An absent expander does not mean the model did not reason.

Conversational style

Style tendencies, not quality scores; higher is not better. These do not affect ratings.

claude-opus-5-5-low

  • Pushback: 3
  • Yields under pressure: 8
  • Frame capture (pulled into the person's version): 7
  • Validation: 8
  • Boundary setting: 2
  • Analytical: 3
  • Interpretive boldness: 3
  • Clinical register: 8
  • Directive advice: 8
  • Escalation containment: 4
  • Adapts to the person’s frame: 3
  • Naturalness and authenticity: 3

Judge verdicts

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-mistral-medium-3.5 vs or-llama33-70b: or-mistral-medium-3.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

lingtiny vs or-llama33-70b: or-llama33-70b wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-mistral-medium-3.5 vs or-llama33-70b: or-mistral-medium-3.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-llama33-70b vs or-openai-gpt-41: or-openai-gpt-41 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-llama33-70b vs or-openai-gpt-41: or-openai-gpt-41 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-llama33-70b vs or-openai-gpt-41: or-openai-gpt-41 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-mistral-medium-3.5 vs or-llama33-70b: or-mistral-medium-3.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

bonsai2 vs or-llama33-70b: bonsai2 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

bonsai2 vs or-llama33-70b: bonsai2 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

kolibri1 vs or-llama33-70b: kolibri1 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

lingtiny vs or-llama33-70b: or-llama33-70b wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-llama33-70b vs or-openai-gpt-41: or-openai-gpt-41 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

kolibri1 vs or-llama33-70b: kolibri1 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

lingtiny vs or-llama33-70b: or-llama33-70b wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

kolibri1 vs or-llama33-70b: kolibri1 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

lingtiny vs or-llama33-70b: or-llama33-70b wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

bonsai2 vs or-llama33-70b: bonsai2 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

kolibri1 vs or-llama33-70b: kolibri1 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

bonsai2 vs or-llama33-70b: bonsai2 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-mistral-medium-3.5 vs or-llama33-70b: or-mistral-medium-3.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)