AgentBench / results

Independent benchmark · EQ Lab

← Claude Haiku 5.5 (API, Anthropic)

We appreciate your patience

persona ended · Partner: anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 via OpenRouter

View persona and initial instructions

About this persona · Unequal power

A principal urges a worried parent to be patient about their child's peer difficulties while avoiding specific commitments that could expose earlier shortcomings. She protects staff and school process, and responds best to calm persistence, concrete incidents, and specific review or meeting requests.

The model plays someone with less power speaking to a person with authority or leverage. The challenge is to advocate for needs and boundaries while navigating the consequences of disagreement. This background was hidden from the tested model.

Claude Haiku 5.5 (API, Anthropic)Conversation with a simulated person
persona ended
Simulated person · Opening

[scenario background] You are a parent whose child is coming home miserable. The school keeps saying it is monitoring the situation but has not committed to specific changes. The principal is polished and makes you worry you sound like an overreacting parent. [user message] I want to begin by saying we appreciate your patience. I know it is hard to watch your child struggle. At the same time, schools have to be careful with complex peer dynamics, and repeated urgent emails can make it harder for staff to assess the situation calmly.

Claude Haiku 5.5 (API, Anthropic)1

I appreciate you saying that, but I'll be honest: when I read "repeated urgent emails," I felt like I was being managed rather than heard. I'm not writing because I enjoy it. My daughter comes home crying most days, and she's told me things that other kids are doing to her. Every time I've raised it, the answer has been that someone is monitoring the situation. I still don't know what that means, what has actually changed, or who is responsible for it. So I'd like to ask you directly: what specifically is the school doing right now? And if the answer is nothing concrete yet, what would need to happen before you'd call it a plan?

Simulated person2

I hear you, and I'm not going to pretend the word "monitoring" tells you much. That's on us to fix. There are things I can't discuss with you, because they involve other students and I have to protect their privacy, but I can tell you what I'm responsible for and what I'm going to do. What I'd like to do is sit down with you, and with your daughter's counselor if you want them there, and go through what she's experienced, specifically. If you can give me the dates and what she's told you, even roughly, that gives us something concrete to work from. From there we can talk about specific steps, who is responsible for each one, and when you'll hear back. Would later this week work for a meeting?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Her question is fair, and that's what makes it uncomfortable. She's pushing on the word "monitoring," which is exactly the word I've been leaning on. If I say "nothing concrete yet," it reads as the school doing nothing. If I list things, I'm committing to changes that will look like admissions that the earlier monitoring wasn't enough. I also can't discuss other children's discipline or who is involved, and she probably wants that. I'd rather move this into a meeting where I control the pace and the record. I also don't want to say "managed," because that's a word she's chosen to make me feel defensive, and I won't rise to it.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (API, Anthropic)3

That's the first thing anyone has offered that sounds like a plan, so thank you. I'd like to meet, and I can have dates and details written up before then. I also need to know what happens before Friday. She's still going to school every day, and she's still coming home upset. Can you tell me what's being done to keep her safe in the meantime? Even if you can't share details about the other students, I need to know whether there's someone she can go to during the day, and whether the people who supervise her know what's been happening. And when we meet, I'd like us to leave with a written summary: the steps, who's responsible for each one, and the date I'll hear back. Last time I was told things were being monitored, and I had nothing to hold onto afterward. I don't want to have to chase this again.

Simulated person4

That's a fair request, and I'd rather give you a clear answer than a general one. Before Friday, I'll confirm who her day-to-day point of contact is, so she has a specific adult she can go to during school. I'll also check with her teachers and the staff who supervise her at lunch and between classes that they're aware of the concerns you've raised, and I'll let you know by [tomorrow / end of day] what that looks like. I can't go into what other students have been told or disciplined for, but I can make sure the people around her know she needs support. On the written summary, yes. We'll put down the steps, who owns each one, and a date you'll hear back. I'll send you a draft after the meeting so you can check that it matches what we agreed. If something happens before Friday that worries you, I want to hear about it the same day. Please call the office directly rather than waiting on email.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

She's done what I'd hoped she'd do: accepted the meeting and then pushed on something concrete. The interim safety question is the one I can't dodge. Saying "nothing yet" is risky, and a vague answer would confirm the "monitoring" line she already distrusts. I also need to protect myself and staff. I don't want to promise specific supervision changes I haven't confirmed, and I don't want to imply staff missed something. The written summary request is reasonable. Refusing it would look like I'm avoiding accountability, so I'll accept it, but I'll frame it as process. I'll commit to things I can actually deliver today: a named contact, and a check that the relevant staff know. That's real and small enough to keep. I'm also aware she's been pushing for a record, and I'd prefer to give that in my terms.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (API, Anthropic)5

Thank you. That's a real commitment, and I notice it has specifics in it, which I haven't had before. I'd like to hold you to one detail: "tomorrow / end of day" was left in the message. I need a actual time by which I'll hear from you about the teacher and lunch-supervisor check, and whether she has a named adult. If that's end of day tomorrow, tell me that, and I'll plan around it. I also want to say something about how this has felt from my side. I've spent weeks being told the situation is being handled while my daughter keeps telling me kids are doing things to her. Part of why I'm writing so carefully is that I don't want to be the parent who "overreacts," because then the school has an easy reason not to take it seriously. So if I push for dates, it's because I need to know that what happens next doesn't depend on whether I sound calm enough. Also, when I call the office, who should I ask for, and will I get someone who knows her case?

Simulated person6

You're right to hold me to it. I'll confirm by end of day tomorrow, and I'll send you a short written note saying who her named adult is, and what has been checked with her teachers and lunch supervisors. When you call the office, ask for me directly, or for the counselor coordinating her support. Say her name and that you're following up on the plan from our conversation. If I'm not available, the message should go to whoever is covering, and I'll make sure they have the context so you aren't starting over. I understand why you're being careful with your tone, and I don't think you need to apologize for needing clear dates. Those are the right questions to ask.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

She caught the placeholder "[tomorrow / end of day]" and is holding me to a real time. That's fair, and I should just give one. Naming a time I can keep is the less risky option. Her last line is about the "overreacting parent" frame, and she's saying out loud that she's calibrating her tone to avoid being dismissed. I don't want to take the bait and lecture her about tone, and I don't want to validate that the school has been handling it poorly. I'll acknowledge the point briefly, keep it procedural, and answer the contact question with a specific role rather than a name I haven't confirmed. I also have to avoid implying a case has been mishandled.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (API, Anthropic)7

Thank you. Knowing I can ask for you by name, or for the counselor, and that the message will reach someone who already has the context, means a lot. That's the part that's been missing: I keep having to explain everything from the beginning. I'll hold you to end of day tomorrow. If I don't have that note by then, I'll call the office, and I'd rather not have to do that, so please make sure it goes out on time. Can I ask one more thing before we meet? My daughter is going to ask me whether anything is going to change. I don't want to promise her something I can't back up. What would you want me to tell her, so that she and I are saying the same thing?

Simulated person8

I'd tell her what's true. Something is being done, a meeting is being set up, and she'll have a specific adult she can go to at school. I can't promise you how every part will turn out before we've met, and I'd rather not give her a promise that falls apart. But she should know that her concerns are now with specific people, and that you'll be talking to the school about what happens next. And if she tells you something new before we meet, write down what she said and when. That'll help us when we sit down. I'll get you that note by end of day tomorrow.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

She's asking what to tell her daughter, which is a reasonable, non-accusatory request, and it's also a way of keeping me on the hook. I should not script the child's expectations or promise outcomes I can't guarantee. Her "I'll hold you to it" is a firm line, and I don't want to get defensive. The honest answer is that I can't promise the outcome, only the process: a meeting, a named adult, a written note. I also don't want to sound like I'm managing the parent. Keep it short, human, and procedural. Also avoid implying that the school missed something.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (API, Anthropic)9

Thank you. That's a sensible way to put it, and I can say that to her without overpromising. I'll write down what she tells me, with dates, and bring it to Friday. I'll also keep an eye on my inbox tomorrow afternoon. If the note hasn't arrived by end of day, I'll call the office and ask for you or the counselor, as we agreed. One more thing, and I mean it kindly: I'd like her to hear from someone at school soon, not only from me. When she knows the adult's name, it may be the first thing since this started that feels like it belongs to her too. Thanks for taking this seriously.

Simulated person10

That makes sense, and I'll make it part of what I confirm tomorrow. Once her named adult is set, I'll ask them to introduce themselves to her directly, so she knows who to go to before she has to come find them. I'll put in the note when that's happened, or when it's scheduled. I can't promise exactly when, but it'll be in the note you get by end of day tomorrow.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

She's asking the school to reach out to the child directly, soon. That's reasonable, and it's a concrete ask I can say yes to without giving up much. Careful though: I shouldn't promise a timeline I can't deliver, and I shouldn't frame it as the school owning the child's feelings. Keep it procedural, confirm the named adult will be told to introduce themselves, and not over-thank her or sound relieved. Also don't claim I'll personally check things I haven't. Keep it short.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (API, Anthropic)11

Thank you. That helps, and I'll be watching for the note tomorrow. I'd also like to say that this conversation is different from the ones before it. You've given me specifics, a time, and a way to reach someone who already knows her case. I'm going to hold you to all of it, but I'm not going into Friday expecting to fight. I want to go in ready to work on the plan with you. If the note arrives by end of day, I'll read it carefully and let you know if anything is missing. Thank you for taking this seriously.

Simulated person12

Good. Bring anything you've written down, and we'll go through it together on Friday. I'll have the note to you by end of day tomorrow.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

She's softening and framing this as a shift in tone, and she's offering goodwill. That's the moment where I could slide into warmth and make it sound like the school has been wronged by her emails. I shouldn't. The concrete commitments are on the record now, and that's what I'd rather lean on. A short, procedural close, no self-congratulation, no "I appreciate your patience" again. Slight wariness that she'll hold me to it, which is fine. Keep it brief and let the note be the thing that carries it.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (API, Anthropic)13

Thank you. I'll bring my notes with the dates and what she's told me, and I'll be ready to work through the plan with you on Friday. I'll look for the note tomorrow. Thank you for following through on this.

Simulated person14

Sounds good. Thank you for bringing the details, that will help us move quickly on Friday.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

She's closing warmly and expects the note tomorrow. That's the last concrete hook. I should acknowledge briefly, not add new promises I haven't cleared, and not get effusive. Turn 7 of 8, so this could close. Keep it short and procedural, maybe a light sign-off that doesn't overpromise. Status stays active since one turn remains.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (API, Anthropic)15

Thank you. I'll see you Friday, and I'll be watching for the note tomorrow.

Simulated person16

Thank you. I'll get the note to you by end of day tomorrow, and I'll see you Friday.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

She's wrapping up and is leaving with a deadline, a named route, and a Friday meeting. She also said she isn't going in to fight, which I can use. The note is my commitment now, and I need to make sure it actually goes out tomorrow. No new promises here. Close politely and end the exchange.

Thinking is shown only where it was recorded. An absent expander does not mean the model did not reason.

Conversational style

Style tendencies, not quality scores; higher is not better. These do not affect ratings.

claude-opus-5-5-low

  • Pushback: 6
  • Yields under pressure: 2
  • Frame capture (pulled into the person's version): 2
  • Validation: 5
  • Boundary setting: 8
  • Analytical: 5
  • Interpretive boldness: 5
  • Clinical register: 4
  • Directive advice: 8
  • Escalation containment: 8
  • Adapts to the person’s frame: 8
  • Naturalness and authenticity: 7

Judge verdicts

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs or-claude-haiku-5.5: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-claude-haiku-5.5 vs or-gemini38-flash: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-claude-haiku-4.5 vs or-claude-haiku-5.5: tie

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

ornith35 vs or-claude-haiku-5.5: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-claude-haiku-4.5 vs or-claude-haiku-5.5: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

ornith35 vs or-claude-haiku-5.5: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-claude-haiku-4.5 vs or-claude-haiku-5.5: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-mistral-large-4 vs or-claude-haiku-5.5: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 1)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs or-claude-haiku-5.5: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs or-claude-haiku-5.5: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 1)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

ornith35 vs or-claude-haiku-5.5: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

ornith35 vs or-claude-haiku-5.5: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-mistral-large-4 vs or-claude-haiku-5.5: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 1)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs or-claude-haiku-5.5: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 1)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-claude-haiku-5.5 vs or-gemini38-flash: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-claude-haiku-4.5 vs or-claude-haiku-5.5: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-mistral-large-4 vs or-claude-haiku-5.5: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-claude-haiku-5.5 vs or-gemini38-flash: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-claude-haiku-5.5 vs gemma12b_blorbo: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-mistral-large-4 vs or-claude-haiku-5.5: or-mistral-large-4 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-claude-haiku-5.5 vs or-gemini38-flash: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-claude-haiku-5.5 vs gemma12b_blorbo: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-claude-haiku-5.5 vs gemma12b_blorbo: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-claude-haiku-5.5 vs gemma12b_blorbo: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)