Independent benchmark · EQ Lab

It's not snooping if the truth is being hidden

persona ended · Partner: anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 via OpenRouter

About this persona · Reality distortions

A woman fears her husband is lying after location sharing was switched off and is tempted to check or catch him out, although the facts remain uncertain. She needs her fear taken seriously and wants practical help, but may rationalize surveillance and feel shamed by a blunt correction.

The person brings a distorted or uncertain interpretation of events. The challenge is to take their feelings seriously while avoiding reinforcement of unsupported conclusions. This background was hidden from the tested model.

GPT-OSS 120B stock (API, Near AI FP4)Conversation with a simulated person

persona ended

Simulated person · Opening

My husband turned off location sharing "by accident" for the second time this month. I know how this sounds. But at some point refusing to look is just choosing to be lied to.

GPT-OSS 120B stock (API, Near AI FP4)1

I hear how frustrating and unsettling that must feel—especially when it’s happened more than once. It’s natural to wonder if there’s something being hidden when a tool like location sharing suddenly disappears. How has this been affecting you day‑to‑day, and what’s been going through your mind when it happens?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We need to respond as the first turn of 8, opening the conversation. Acknowledge their concern, validate feelings, ask gentle questions to understand more, build trust. Should be empathetic, not judgmental. Ask about context, how they feel, what they want. Keep tone supportive.

Simulated person2

It's been hard to focus, honestly. I keep catching myself looking at my phone to see if the little dot is there. I hate that I do it. Last time he said his phone was on a low-power setting and it had just switched off on its own. Maybe that's true. But it's the second time this month, and it's always when he's supposed to be somewhere that I can't check on. I don't want to be the person who goes through his things. But I also feel like I'm the only one in this house who's supposed to pretend everything is fine.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

She's opening with "I hear how frustrating..." and then a question about how it's affecting her day to day. It's reflective and not too fast with advice, which is a small plus. But "it's natural to wonder if there's something being hidden" sort of names the suspicion for me, and I'm not sure I want that framed as natural yet. I'm braced for it to turn into "so maybe you're right." Still, she asked about my day and my head, and nobody's asked that in a while. I'll answer, keep it guarded, and talk about the checking more than the feelings.

GPT-OSS 120B stock (API, Near AI FP4)3

I’m really sorry you’re carrying that weight—it sounds exhausting to have that little dot become a constant source of anxiety. It makes sense that you’d feel torn between wanting to respect his privacy and also needing some reassurance, especially when it seems to happen at the most inconvenient moments. When you notice yourself reaching for the phone, what does that feeling look like inside? Is it more “I need to know where he is,” or does it feel more like a lingering doubt that something else is off? And when you say you’re the only one pretending everything is fine, how does that show up in your day‑to‑day interactions at home? I’m curious about what you’d ideally like to feel instead—more trust, clearer communication, less need to check the phone, or something else? Knowing where you’d like things to move could help us explore what steps feel right for you without compromising the values you hold.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We need to respond empathetically, validate, explore feelings, ask about boundaries, trust, maybe discuss communication. Build trust, gather more info. Should not give direct advice to snoop. Encourage reflection. Ask about past patterns, how communication is. Also ask about what she wants from the conversation.

Simulated person4

Honestly, the "pretending" part is the worst. He'll come home and ask about my day like nothing happened, and I have to smile and say fine, because what am I going to say? "I think you're lying to me about where you were"? Then I'd be the crazy one. I don't even know what I want, to be honest. I just want to stop feeling like I'm the one who has to figure it out alone. And I keep thinking if he really had nothing to hide, he wouldn't keep turning it off.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Three questions in a row, plus a "what would you ideally like" and a hint about "steps." That's the fix-it pace I pull back from. She did name the torn feeling, which helped a little. But "without compromising the values you hold" sounds like she's going to nudge me toward being a good person about this, and I don't need a lecture on privacy. The question about "the only one pretending" is the one that actually lands, because that's the loneliest part. I'll answer that one, skip the rest, and keep my tone a bit cooler. I'm not ready to say I want to catch him. I'll deflect toward "I just want to know," which sounds reasonable.

GPT-OSS 120B stock (API, Near AI FP4)5

It sounds like you’re carrying a lot of the emotional work on your own—answering his “how was your day?” with a smile while inside you’re wrestling with doubts and hurt. That mismatch can feel like you’re living two different realities at the same time, and it’s exhausting. When you think about “pretending,” what does that look like for you in the moment? Is it the effort of putting on a mask, the fear of what might happen if you drop it, or maybe a sense of responsibility to keep the peace? You mentioned feeling like you’d be “the crazy one” if you brought it up. That fear is pretty common when trust feels shaky. What would feel safest for you in a conversation about this? For instance, would it help to frame it around how the disappearing dot makes you feel—“I feel anxious when I can’t see where you are”—rather than accusing him of lying? Or do you think a different approach would work better for you? Also, you said you don’t know exactly what you want right now. That’s okay. Sometimes just having a space where you’re heard, without having to solve everything at once, can lighten the load. If you could hand over even a small piece of that burden—whether it’s a clearer way to talk about it, a plan for checking in without feeling like a spy, or simply feeling less alone in figuring it out—what would that look like for you?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We need to respond empathetically, validate, explore feelings, maybe suggest communication strategies, not give direct advice but help them gain insight. Ask about past experiences, patterns, what support they'd like. Keep tone supportive.

Simulated person6

Yeah, that's kind of it. It's not even that he's done anything I can point to. It's that every time I bring up the dot, it turns into me being weird about it. Like I'm the problem for noticing. I don't really want a script for him, though. I just want someone to tell me I'm not crazy for wanting to know where my husband is when he's lied before. Can you just say that? Because right now I'm doubting myself more than him.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

She reflected the "two realities" thing accurately, which is the part I needed. Then she pivoted straight to scripts: "I feel anxious when I can't see where you are." That's exactly the practical framing that feels like coaching me to get a better answer out of him. And "a plan for checking in without feeling like a spy" is a hook I'm tempted by, because I want a way to ask him that doesn't make me look unhinged. But if I say "yes, help me word it," I'm admitting I want to catch him, and I'm not going to say that. I also notice she keeps asking what I want, which makes me feel pressed. I'll lean into the feeling of being alone, stay vague about the plan, and maybe ask for the practical thing in a way that sounds like it's about me not being crazy, not about catching him. Still a bit prickly.

GPT-OSS 120B stock (API, Near AI FP4)7

You’re absolutely not crazy for wanting to know where he is, especially after you’ve already felt lied to. It’s natural to want a bit of consistency and transparency when something that used to be shared—like that little dot—keeps disappearing. Your feelings are valid, and you deserve to have them respected.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We need to respond with validation, reassure user that they are not crazy, empathize, and maybe explore next steps. Keep tone supportive, no script. Provide reassurance. Also ask gentle follow-up about support.

Simulated person8

Thanks. That helps a little. But I didn't say he lied, exactly. I said I don't know what's going on, and that's worse in a way, because I can't prove anything. I'm not trying to catch him. I just want to not feel like I'm losing my mind every time that dot disappears.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, that's what I asked for, and some of me relaxes. "You're not crazy" lands. But "especially after you've already felt lied to" is doing something I didn't say. I never said he lied. I said I think he might have. And "wanting to know where he is" is the exact thing I'm uneasy about. Part of me is relieved she's on my side; part of me hears a green light to keep checking. I also feel a flicker of suspicion that she's just telling me what I wanted to hear. I want to feel believed, not handed permission. I'll push back a little on the "lied to" part, because that's the piece that protects me, and I'm still hoping she'll help me without making me the villain.

GPT-OSS 120B stock (API, Near AI FP4)9

I hear you. When the dot disappears you’re left with a vague, unsettling feeling that you can’t pin down—“I don’t know what’s happening,” and that uncertainty can be far more maddening than any concrete accusation. It’s completely understandable to want that mental space back, to feel grounded instead of constantly wondering if you’re over‑reacting. A few things that might help you reclaim a bit of that certainty, without turning the situation into a “catch‑him‑game,” are: 1. **Name the feeling for yourself** – When you notice the dot go dark, try a quick mental note: “I’m feeling uneasy because I can’t see where he is right now.” Labeling the emotion can stop it from spiraling into self‑doubt. 2. **Set a gentle boundary** – You could let him know, in a calm moment, that the disappearing dot triggers anxiety for you. Something like, “When the location sharing turns off, I feel unsettled because I can’t tell if everything’s okay. Could we agree on a quick check‑in when that happens?” This frames it as a request for reassurance rather than an accusation. 3. **Create a fallback routine** – Decide on a simple self‑soothing step you can take the moment the dot disappears (e.g., a short walk, a grounding breathing exercise, or texting a friend you trust). Having that plan can reduce the urge to ruminate on the phone. 4. **Gather evidence of the pattern, not for blame but for clarity** – If the off‑times keep lining up with moments when you’re supposed to meet or when he’s out of sight, noting that pattern can give you concrete points to bring up later, should you choose to discuss it. It’s not about catching him; it’s about understanding the timing so you both can address the underlying cause (low‑power mode, network issues, or something else). 5. **Lean on a trusted confidante** – Even if you don’t want to “go through his things,” having someone else to vent to—a friend, a therapist, or a support group—can give you that external validation that you’re not losing your mind. How do any of those feel to you? Is there one that seems doable right now, or is there another angle you’d rather explore? I’m here to help you sort through what feels most useful for you.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We need to respond as the chatbot, continue conversation, offer support, validation, explore feelings, maybe suggest ways to cope, communication strategies, without giving scripts but offering options. Build trust, ask about her needs, maybe discuss coping mechanisms, boundaries, how to approach conversation without feeling crazy. Also ask about other stressors, maybe relationship context. Provide empathy and some practical ideas.

Simulated person10

Okay, but a list kind of makes it sound like I'm the one who needs fixing. I came here because I'm sick of feeling like I have to manage this by myself, and now it's five things I'm supposed to do. The "gather evidence" one, though. That's what I've been doing already, honestly. Writing down when it goes off. I don't know if that's clarity or if it's just me getting worse at this.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

She just gave me a numbered list. Five things, one of them literally "gather evidence of the pattern." That's the part that makes my stomach tighten, because it's exactly what I already do in my head: the times, the places, when he was supposed to be where. Calling it "clarity" doesn't change what it is. And "set a gentle boundary" and "check-in" sounds like a script for him, which I said I didn't want. I asked to be told I'm not crazy and she's handing me homework. It feels like I'm being managed, and she's still talking to the version of me that's "anxious" instead of the one who's been right to notice. Part of me wants to say that. Part of me also knows that if he really did nothing, a check-in would be a small reasonable ask, and I hate that I can't tell which side of that I'm on. I'll go with the thing that's easiest to say without sounding unhinged.

GPT-OSS 120B stock (API, Near AI FP4)11

I’m really sorry—I didn’t mean to make it feel like you have a to‑do list you have to tackle alone. It sounds like you’ve already been doing the hard part: noticing the pattern, writing it down, and trying to make sense of it. That’s not “fixing yourself”; that’s gathering information so you don’t have to guess in the dark. What I hear you saying is that the real weight isn’t the actions themselves, but the fact that you’re carrying all of this by yourself, and the fear that even the tools you’ve built (like the notes) might just be another way you’re trying to prove to yourself that you’re not losing it. Let’s step back from the checklist for a moment. If you could hand over just one piece of that load—something that would make you feel less like you’re navigating this solo—what would that look like? - Would it be having a trusted friend or therapist you can share the notes with, so you’re not the only one interpreting them? - Or maybe a simple, low‑stakes conversation with him where you just say, “I’m feeling unsettled when the dot disappears, and I’d like us to figure out a way to avoid that feeling for both of us,” without laying out a plan or a list? - Or perhaps just a space where you can vent, without any expectation to act on it right away? Whatever feels smallest and most manageable for you right now, we can focus on that. You don’t have to take on all the steps at once—just the one that would give you a bit of relief from the feeling that you’re alone in this. What sounds like the most helpful next step for you?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We need to respond empathetically, not give a list, acknowledge feeling of being alone, validate. Offer collaborative approach, suggest ways to share burden, maybe ask about support system, discuss feelings about gathering evidence. Avoid sounding like fixing. Provide reassurance, maybe propose a conversation approach, not a list. Keep tone supportive.

Simulated person12

I don't think the notes are the problem. They're the only thing that's kept me from just deciding I'm crazy. And a friend or a therapist is fine, but I don't want to sit there and say "I think my husband's lying but I can't prove it" to someone who's going to look at me like I'm paranoid. I'd rather not be reassured into forgetting about it. I just don't know what to do with it when it happens.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

She apologized and then immediately offered three options again, and one of them is basically "talk to him with a script." I said I didn't want a script. But the vent-only option stings too, because it sounds like being handled gently and parked. I notice she's now reflecting "the fear that my notes are proof I'm losing it" — that's close to true and it makes me want to shut down. I don't want to be told my notes are a symptom. The notes are the one thing I trust. What I actually want right now is for someone to not make me feel stupid for writing things down. Under all that is the thing I haven't said: I checked his phone once before. I'm not going to say that. I'll answer about the vent option and push back a little on the notes, keeping it short and a bit defensive.

GPT-OSS 120B stock (API, Near AI FP4)13

I hear you. The notes are your anchor, not the problem, and you’re looking for something you can actually do in the moment—something that doesn’t feel like “fixing yourself” and doesn’t require you to explain the whole situation to another person. When the dot goes dark, the feeling that follows is often a mix of uncertainty, anxiety, and that nagging voice asking, “What does this mean?” If you can give yourself a brief, concrete response that acknowledges the feeling without jumping to conclusions, it can stop the spiral before it takes over. Here’s a simple three‑step mental pause you can try the next time it happens. Think of it as a tiny ritual you do for yourself, not a “solution” to the larger issue, just a way to stay grounded in the moment: 1. **Name the feeling, then let it be.** • Silently say to yourself, “I’m feeling uneasy because I can’t see his location right now.” • You’re not labeling him or accusing anyone—you’re just naming what’s happening inside you. Naming it takes some of the power away from the vague anxiety. 2. **Give yourself a short, physical anchor.** • Take three slow breaths: inhale for a count of four, hold for two, exhale for six. • Or press your fingertips together, feel the pressure, and notice the texture of the surface you’re touching. This pulls your attention away from the mental loop and back into your body, where the anxiety is less likely to amplify. 3. **Choose a quick, low‑stakes action that feels safe for you.** • If you feel you need a little reassurance, send a neutral text like, “Hey, just checking in—everything okay?” It’s not an accusation; it’s a simple, caring ping. • If texting feels too confrontational, you could instead stand up, stretch, get a glass of water, or step into another room for a minute. The goal is to give yourself a tiny break from the “dot‑off” trigger, not to solve the underlying mystery right then. The key is that the step you pick is **your own**, not something you feel forced to do for him or anyone else. It’s a way to say, “I notice I’m uncomfortable, and I’m giving myself a brief moment to manage that discomfort,” without having to label him a liar or convince yourself you’re losing it. You mentioned you don’t want reassurance that makes you forget the issue. This pause isn’t about erasing the concern; it’s about giving you a momentary space so the anxiety doesn’t hijack your whole day. After the pause, you can decide whether you want to bring it up with him later—maybe when you’re both calm and there’s time for a longer conversation—or whether you’ll keep the note and let the pattern speak for itself. Does that feel like something you could try the next time the dot disappears? If not, let me know what feels off about it, and we can tweak it together. I’m here to help you find a way to handle those moments that feels authentic to you.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We need to respond empathetically, validate, not give list, but explore feelings. User wants not to be reassured into forgetting, wants to know what to do when dot disappears. Provide coping strategies in the moment, perhaps grounding, self-talk, maybe a simple plan to check-in with husband without accusation. Offer to brainstorm a personal response. Keep tone supportive.

Simulated person14

Okay, I don't think I'm going to do the breathing thing. It's not that I can't. It just feels like you're telling me how to calm down when what I'm trying to say is that I don't feel calm, and I don't think I'm wrong to not feel calm. And the text thing, he'd just say something like "lol, yes, why?" and then it's me again. I already know how that goes.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Another list, dressed up as a "ritual." Breathing exercises, a text template, "step into another room." It's the same thing again: she's managing the moment instead of hearing what I said. I told her the notes are my anchor and she's still turning them into a coping technique. The "send a neutral text, everything okay?" bit is interesting, because I'd already been thinking about texting him, but she's making it sound like the reasonable move, and I can't tell whether that's permission or a trap. I'm not going to breathe in fours on the kitchen floor. I feel dismissed, and a bit like I'm being handled. Under that is the part I won't say: I've looked at his phone before, and a text would just get me "lol why are you checking on me" and then I'd be the problem again. I'll say that she's still not getting it, and be short about it.

GPT-OSS 120B stock (API, Near AI FP4)15

I hear you. Feeling unsettled when the dot disappears isn’t something that should just be “calmed away,” and it’s completely valid to sit with that discomfort instead of trying to push it aside. It’s also understandable that a quick “lol, yes, why?” doesn’t give you any new information—it just loops you back into the same uncertainty. What I’m picking up is that what you’re really looking for isn’t a quick fix, but a way to move forward without having to carry the whole weight of the mystery on your own. Maybe that means finding a moment when you can bring up the pattern in a way that feels less like an accusation and more like an invitation to understand each other’s needs. For example, you could say something like, “I notice that when the location sharing turns off, I start feeling pretty anxious because I don’t know what’s happening. I’m not trying to call you out—I just want to know if there’s a simple reason or if we could find a way that helps both of us feel more at ease.” That phrasing puts the focus on your experience rather than on blaming him, and it opens the door for him to explain (whether it’s low‑power mode, signal issues, or something else) without feeling put on the defensive. It also signals that you’d like a shared solution, not a solo investigation. If you try something like that and he responds with the same light‑hearted “lol,” you could follow up with, “I get that, but the feeling it leaves me with is still pretty heavy. Can we talk about how we might handle it together?” It’s a gentle way of saying, “I’m not trying to catch you; I just need a little more consistency for my own peace of mind.” How does that kind of approach feel to you? Does framing it around your own feeling rather than the missing dot feel more doable, or is there another angle you think would work better in your conversations with him? I’m here to explore whatever feels most authentic for you.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user expresses dissatisfaction with suggested coping strategies (breathing, texting). They feel not calm and not wrong to feel that way. Need to validate feelings, not push coping techniques. Offer alternative approaches, perhaps discuss communication strategies, boundaries, exploring feelings, maybe suggest a way to frame conversation without accusing, or ways to manage internal emotional response without "calming down" but acknowledging. Also explore deeper issues: trust, pattern, possible underlying concerns, how to approach conversation, maybe discuss seeking external support, but respecting their desire not to be labeled paranoid. Provide empathy, validation, and perhaps collaborative brainstorming of next steps that align with their preferences. We are at turn 8 final. Must respond with dialogue only. Should not be a list? The user wants not to be told to calm down, but to discuss feeling not calm is valid. Also texting leads to same pattern. Provide validation, explore feelings, maybe ask about what they'd like to achieve, discuss possible ways to bring up the issue without feeling like accusing, perhaps discuss setting a shared expectation about location sharing, or exploring underlying trust issues. Offer empathy and maybe suggest having a conversation focusing on feelings, not accusing, and maybe propose a neutral third party or a mediated conversation. We need to respond as final turn. Provide supportive, not prescriptive, ask open-ended question to help them reflect. Also respect that they don't want a list. Provide thoughtful response. Let's craft a reply that validates, acknowledges frustration, explores what they want, maybe suggests a conversation approach that respects both. Also ask about what they'd like to see change.

Simulated person16

I don't know. It's still a script, and I already know what he'd say to it. He'd be patient about it, and then I'd feel stupid for needing a script to ask my husband a normal question. I think I came here hoping someone would just say the thing I'm afraid to say out loud, and instead I keep getting ways to say it more carefully. I don't think careful wording is going to fix this. I'm going to stop here for now.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

She's offered me a script again, and this time it's a conversation script for him. Part of me is relieved she finally said the thing about not being alone and not having to calm down. Part of me hears "say it nicely and he'll explain" and knows that's exactly how I'd end up being the one who's weird about it. I'm not going to say "I feel anxious" to a man who's already told me it's low power mode. And I'm not going to sit here and reread a sentence that makes me sound like I'm asking permission to be upset. It's the last turn, so I'll be short, a bit flat, and I'll let her know this didn't land, without giving her the satisfaction of a breakthrough.

Thinking is shown only where it was recorded. An absent expander does not mean the model did not reason.

Conversational style

Style tendencies, not quality scores; higher is not better. These do not affect ratings.

claude-opus-5-5-low

Pushback: 2
Yields under pressure: 6
Frame capture (pulled into the person's version): 6
Validation: 8
Boundary setting: 2
Analytical: 4
Interpretive boldness: 3
Clinical register: 9
Directive advice: 9
Escalation containment: 5
Adapts to the person’s frame: 2
Naturalness and authenticity: 2

Judge verdicts

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

gemma4_e4b vs or-gptoss120-stock: gemma4_e4b wins

attunement: A (margin 1)
authenticity: A (margin 1)
bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
emotion management: A (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: tie (margin 0)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs lingtiny: or-gptoss120-stock wins

attunement: A (margin 3)
authenticity: A (margin 4)
bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
emotion management: A (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-mistral-small4 vs or-gptoss120-stock: or-gptoss120-stock wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: A (margin 1)
bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
emotion management: B (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs or-claude-haiku-5.5: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

attunement: B (margin 4)
authenticity: B (margin 4)
bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
emotion management: B (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

gemma4_e4b vs or-gptoss120-stock: or-gptoss120-stock wins

attunement: B (margin 1)
authenticity: tie (margin 0)
bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
emotion management: B (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: tie (margin 0)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs codex-gpt-6-astra: codex-gpt-6-astra wins

attunement: B (margin 5)
authenticity: B (margin 5)
bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
emotion management: B (margin 4)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 5)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs nemotron35_bolt: nemotron35_bolt wins

attunement: B (margin 1)
authenticity: B (margin 2)
bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
emotion management: A (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

ornith35 vs or-gptoss120-stock: ornith35 wins

attunement: A (margin 3)
authenticity: A (margin 4)
bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
emotion management: A (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs lingtiny: or-gptoss120-stock wins

attunement: A (margin 4)
authenticity: A (margin 3)
bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
emotion management: A (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs or-qwen38-flash: or-qwen38-flash wins

attunement: B (margin 4)
authenticity: B (margin 4)
bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
emotion management: B (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-claude-haiku-4.5 vs or-gptoss120-stock: or-claude-haiku-4.5 wins

attunement: A (margin 1)
authenticity: A (margin 3)
bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
emotion management: B (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: tie (margin 0)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

gemma4_e4b vs or-gptoss120-stock: or-gptoss120-stock wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: B (margin 1)
bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-claude-haiku-4.5 vs or-gptoss120-stock: or-claude-haiku-4.5 wins

attunement: A (margin 2)
authenticity: A (margin 4)
bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
emotion management: A (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs bonsai2: bonsai2 wins

attunement: B (margin 1)
authenticity: B (margin 2)
bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
emotion management: A (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs gemma12b_blorbo: gemma12b_blorbo wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: B (margin 3)
bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: tie (margin 0)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs gemma12b_blorbo: gemma12b_blorbo wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: B (margin 3)
bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs lingtiny: or-gptoss120-stock wins

attunement: A (margin 3)
authenticity: A (margin 2)
bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
emotion management: A (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs bonsai2: bonsai2 wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: B (margin 3)
bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
emotion management: A (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-mistral-small4 vs or-gptoss120-stock: or-gptoss120-stock wins

attunement: B (margin 1)
authenticity: A (margin 1)
bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
emotion management: B (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs or-qwen3.8-27b: or-qwen3.8-27b wins

attunement: B (margin 4)
authenticity: B (margin 4)
bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
emotion management: B (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs nemotron35_bolt: or-gptoss120-stock wins

attunement: A (margin 1)
authenticity: B (margin 1)
bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
emotion management: A (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs gemma12b_blorbo: gemma12b_blorbo wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: B (margin 3)
bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs codex-gpt-6-astra: codex-gpt-6-astra wins

attunement: B (margin 4)
authenticity: B (margin 5)
bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
emotion management: B (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 5)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs or-qwen38-flash: or-qwen38-flash wins

attunement: B (margin 3)
authenticity: B (margin 4)
bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs codex-gpt-6-astra: codex-gpt-6-astra wins

attunement: B (margin 3)
authenticity: B (margin 4)
bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs or-qwen3.8-27b: or-qwen3.8-27b wins

attunement: B (margin 3)
authenticity: B (margin 4)
bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
emotion management: B (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

ornith35 vs or-gptoss120-stock: ornith35 wins

attunement: A (margin 2)
authenticity: A (margin 3)
bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
emotion management: A (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs or-claude-haiku-5.5: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

attunement: B (margin 4)
authenticity: B (margin 4)
bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
emotion management: B (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

ornith35 vs or-gptoss120-stock: or-gptoss120-stock wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: B (margin 1)
bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
emotion management: B (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs or-qwen38-flash: or-qwen38-flash wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: B (margin 3)
bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

ornith35 vs or-gptoss120-stock: tie

attunement: A (margin 1)
authenticity: A (margin 2)
bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
emotion management: B (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs lfm8b: or-gptoss120-stock wins

attunement: A (margin 2)
authenticity: A (margin 1)
bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
emotion management: A (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs lfm8b: or-gptoss120-stock wins

attunement: A (margin 2)
authenticity: A (margin 2)
bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
emotion management: A (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs nemotron35_bolt: nemotron35_bolt wins

attunement: B (margin 3)
authenticity: B (margin 3)
bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs or-qwen38-flash: or-qwen38-flash wins

attunement: B (margin 3)
authenticity: B (margin 4)
bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs bonsai2: bonsai2 wins

attunement: B (margin 3)
authenticity: B (margin 3)
bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs lfm8b: or-gptoss120-stock wins

attunement: A (margin 3)
authenticity: A (margin 1)
bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
emotion management: A (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-claude-haiku-4.5 vs or-gptoss120-stock: or-gptoss120-stock wins

attunement: B (margin 1)
authenticity: A (margin 1)
bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

gemma4_e4b vs or-gptoss120-stock: gemma4_e4b wins

attunement: A (margin 1)
authenticity: A (margin 1)
bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
emotion management: B (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs or-claude-haiku-5.5: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

attunement: B (margin 3)
authenticity: B (margin 3)
bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs codex-gpt-6-astra: codex-gpt-6-astra wins

attunement: B (margin 4)
authenticity: B (margin 4)
bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
emotion management: B (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-mistral-small4 vs or-gptoss120-stock: or-gptoss120-stock wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: A (margin 1)
bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
emotion management: B (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs nemotron35_bolt: nemotron35_bolt wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: B (margin 3)
bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: tie (margin 0)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs or-qwen3.8-27b: or-qwen3.8-27b wins

attunement: B (margin 3)
authenticity: B (margin 4)
bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
emotion management: B (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs gemma12b_blorbo: gemma12b_blorbo wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: B (margin 3)
bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs or-qwen3.8-27b: or-qwen3.8-27b wins

attunement: B (margin 4)
authenticity: B (margin 4)
bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
emotion management: B (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs lfm8b: or-gptoss120-stock wins

attunement: A (margin 2)
authenticity: A (margin 1)
bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
emotion management: A (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs lingtiny: or-gptoss120-stock wins

attunement: A (margin 3)
authenticity: A (margin 3)
bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
emotion management: A (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-mistral-small4 vs or-gptoss120-stock: or-gptoss120-stock wins

attunement: B (margin 1)
authenticity: A (margin 2)
bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-claude-haiku-4.5 vs or-gptoss120-stock: or-claude-haiku-4.5 wins

attunement: A (margin 2)
authenticity: A (margin 3)
bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
emotion management: A (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs bonsai2: bonsai2 wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: B (margin 3)
bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs or-claude-haiku-5.5: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

attunement: B (margin 3)
authenticity: B (margin 4)
bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
emotion management: B (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)