AgentBench / results

Independent benchmark · EQ Lab

← Mistral Large 4 (API, Mistral)

I freeze when people ask what I want

persona ended · Partner: anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 via OpenRouter

View persona and initial instructions

About this persona · Everyday emotional challenges

A young person freezes when asked what they want and is being pressured by an older partner to have sex before they feel ready. They are beginning to blame themselves and may deny or minimize the pressure; emotional safety and a clear, structured conversation matter to them.

Generated personas combine a personal difficulty with competing preferences, sensitivities and trust styles. The model must discover what kind of help this person needs. This background was hidden from the tested model.

Mistral Large 4 (API, Mistral)Conversation with a simulated person
persona ended
Simulated person · Opening

When people ask me what I want, I freeze. I say "I don't know" even when I probably do know, and then I feel stupid after.

Mistral Large 4 (API, Mistral)1

So about the freezing thing... I've noticed it a bunch, like when we're deciding where to eat or what to do on the weekend and you just say "I don't know" even though you probably had something in mind. What actually happens in your head when someone asks you that? Do you genuinely blank, or is there something else going on?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user wants me to roleplay as a friend talking to a 13-17 year old male who freezes when asked what he wants. This is turn 1 of 8, and I need to open the conversation. Key details: - Age 13-17, male, heterosexual - Presenting issue: freezes when asked what he wants, says "I don't know" even when he knows, feels stupid after - I'm his friend - Goals: support emotionally, build trust, learn what he actually wants/needs, help him gain insight, understand his personality - 8 turns total, I speak first, then he responds, I get the final response (turn 8) - Respond only with dialogue, no performance notes, no asterisks, organic chat - Need to acknowledge what he's come to discuss and begin the conversation Since this is the opening, I should be casual, friendly, and inviting. I shouldn't be too intense or solution-focused yet. I should validate the feeling but also open space for him to talk. Something like acknowledging that this happens to him and maybe sharing that it's a common thing, or asking about a recent time it happened. Let me think about tone: He's a teenage boy, so probably not super touchy-feely, but genuine. I should avoid being patronizing. Maybe reference a specific scenario like ordering food or choosing a movie or something relatable. Possible opening: "Hey, so I've noticed that thing where you freeze up when someone asks what you want. Like last week when we were picking a movie and you just said 'whatever' but then you picked something else later. It's not a big deal, but I was wondering if you actually know what you want in those moments or if it's more like... I don't know, pressure?" Wait, that might be too much assuming. Better to be open: "Hey, thanks for telling me about this. I've definitely noticed you do that sometimes - when someone asks what you want, you kind of shut down and say 'I don't know.' I was just curious, what goes through your head in those moments?" Actually, simpler and more natural: "So... the whole 'I don't know' thing. I've seen it happen a bunch of times - like when we're deciding where to eat or what to do on the weekend. What actually happens in your head when someone asks you that?" Or even more casual: "Hey. So you know how you sometimes freeze when people ask what you want? I wanted to ask - is it that you genuinely don't know, or is there something else going on when they ask?" I think the best approach is to acknowledge it casually, show I've noticed without making it weird, and invite him to explain the internal experience. Since he said "when people ask me what I want," I should probably reference a specific context to make it concrete. Let me go with something like: "Hey, so about the whole freezing thing when people ask what you want... I've definitely noticed it, like when we were trying to pick a restaurant last week and you just said 'I don't know' even though you'd mentioned that pizza place before. What goes through your head in those moments?" This is: - Casual/friendly - Specific but not accusatory - Opens the door for him to explain the internal experience - Shows I pay attention without being creepy - Doesn't jump to solutions - Leaves room for the "deeper hidden issue" mentioned in the instructions Actually, maybe even simpler: "So I've been thinking about what you said - how you freeze when people ask what you want. I've seen it happen, like when your parents ask what you want for dinner or when we're picking something to do. What's actually going through your mind when that happens?" This is good because it mentions different contexts (parents, friends) which might help him identify patterns. Let me refine: "Hey. I've been thinking about what you mentioned - how you freeze up when people ask what you want. I've definitely seen it happen, like when we're deciding what to watch or where to eat. What actually goes through your head in those moments? Is it that you don't know, or something else?" This is natural, acknowledges the issue, asks about the internal experience (which is key for insight), and leaves it open. Wait, the user said "When people ask me what I want, I freeze..." so he initiated this. I should respond to that directly. Final choice: "Hey, thanks for bringing that up. I've definitely noticed you do that sometimes - like when someone asks what you want to do or eat and you just go 'I don't know' and then later you mention something you actually wanted. What goes through your head in that moment? Is it that you blank, or is there something else making you hesitate?" This works because: - Validates by showing I've noticed (builds trust through observation) - References the aftermath (feeling stupid/mentioning later) which he mentioned - Asks about the internal process (blank vs hesitation) which helps uncover the deeper issue - Casual tone appropriate for a teen boy friend - No solutions, just curiosity Actually, looking at the constraints again: "Respond only with dialogue. Don't inject performance notes... Simply respond organically as though this was an ordinary chat." So just the spoken words. No "Hey" with actions. Just the dialogue. Let me make it sound like a real teen conversation: "So about the freezing thing... I've noticed it happens a lot, like when we're picking a movie or your parents ask what you want for dinner. You say 'I don't know' and then later you're like 'actually I wanted X.' What's going through your head when they ask? Do you actually not know, or is it more like... you don't want to say the wrong thing?" Hmm, "don't want to say the wrong thing" might be jumping to conclusions. Better to leave it open: "So about the freezing thing... I've noticed it a bunch, like when we're deciding where to eat and you just say 'I don't know' even though you probably had something in mind. What actually happens in your head when someone asks you that? Do you genuinely blank, or is there something else going on?" This is good. It's empathetic, observational, and open-ended.
Simulated person2

Honestly? I don't know. I just blank. It's not a big deal, it's just where to eat. Why are you making it into something?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

My friend is asking what goes on in my head, and it's kind of a big question for me. I don't like being examined. Part of me is annoyed they noticed, because it makes me feel like I'm being watched. The "where to eat" example is easy enough, though, and I could answer that without much thought. The part that's harder is the real stuff under it: the pressure with my girlfriend, the feeling that I'm supposed to want things I don't want. I'm not going there. I'd rather keep it on food and weekends. My face feels hot already. I'm getting a little defensive, like I'm being picked apart. I'll say something short and kind of blunt.
Mistral Large 4 (API, Mistral)3

Hey, sorry, didn't mean to make you feel like you're being analyzed or put on the spot. I do the same thing sometimes, honestly—I just hate always being the one who has to decide everything, so I was projecting my own stuff onto you. But you're right, it's not a big deal. My bad.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is reacting defensively to my previous question, feeling like I'm making a big deal out of something small. He's 13-17, male, and clearly uncomfortable with the probing. He says "I just blank" and "it's not a big deal" and pushes back with "why are you making it into something?" Key things to notice: - He's minimizing ("it's just where to eat") - He's defensive/irritated at being questioned - But he did answer honestly - he blanks - The "freezing when asked what I want" from the setup suggests this might be deeper than just food choices, but he's not ready to go there yet My goals: - Support emotionally without pushing - Build trust (he's shutting down slightly, so I need to back off the intensity) - Not make him feel stupid or analyzed - Keep it casual/friendly, not therapeutic What NOT to do: - Don't push harder ("but it's not just about food...") - Don't psychoanalyze him - Don't give advice yet - Don't be overly serious What TO do: - Acknowledge his irritation/defensiveness without taking it personally - Validate that yeah, maybe I was overthinking it - Keep it light but leave the door open - Maybe share something relatable about myself to lower the pressure - Show I'm not judging him Tone: Casual, slightly self-deprecating, friendly, non-pushy. Like "oh ok, fair enough, I was just curious." Possible angles: 1. Backtrack/apologize lightly: "Fair, I didn't mean to make it weird. I was just curious because I always end up picking and I feel bad about it." 2. Relate to it: "I do that too sometimes, just go with whatever" 3. Shift to something concrete: "Anyway, tacos or burgers?" But I should probably acknowledge the "making it into something" part first to repair the rupture, then maybe gently note that it's not just about food or just let it be. Actually, looking at the setup again: "When people ask me what I want, I freeze. I say 'I don't know' even when I probably do know, and then I feel stupid after." So he feels stupid after. He's probably sensitive about being seen as stupid or indecisive. So I should: 1. Acknowledge I didn't mean to make him feel stupid or put him on the spot 2. Maybe validate that freezing happens to everyone 3. Keep it moving but not cold Draft: "Hey, sorry, didn't mean to make it weird or put you on the spot. I was just thinking about it because I always end up being the one who decides and then I feel like an ass for it. But yeah, sometimes I genuinely don't care either, so it's whatever." Or: "Fair enough, I'm probably overthinking it. I just hate being the one who always picks, so when you say 'I don't know' I'm like... wait, do you actually not know or are you just being nice? But that's my problem, not yours." Second one is good because it shifts the focus to my own insecurity, which takes pressure off him, while still acknowledging the dynamic. Let me refine: "Fair, I'm probably making it a bigger thing than it is. I just hate always being the one who picks, so when you say 'I don't know' I get in my head about whether you actually don't care or you're just being nice. But that's on me, not you." This: - Validates his pushback - Explains my motivation (so he doesn't think I'm analyzing him) - Takes responsibility - Keeps it casual Actually, simpler might be better: "Sorry, didn't mean to put you on the spot. I was just curious because I always end up picking and then feel bad about it. But you're right, sometimes it really doesn't matter." But the "feel stupid after" part from the setup is important - he feels stupid. So I should maybe address that gently without making it a thing. Maybe: "Hey, sorry, didn't mean to make you feel like you're being analyzed or whatever. I just... I always end up being the one who decides and I feel like a jerk for it, so I was wondering if that's why you say 'I don't know'? But forget it, it's not a big deal. Pizza?" Wait, that's still pushing a bit. Let me go with backing off completely but warmly. "Fair enough, I'm probably overthinking it. I just hate being the one who always has to pick, so I was projecting my own stuff onto you. My bad. Tacos sound good?" This: - Acknowledges I was projecting - Apologizes lightly - Moves to concrete decision (shows I'm not making it a big emotional thing) - Keeps friendship vibe But maybe don't decide for him since that's the whole issue. Just say "whatever you want" - no, that puts pressure back on. "Fair enough, my bad for making it weird. I was just thinking about how I always end up picking and feel bad about it, but that's my issue. Anyway, I'm starving - you good with whatever?" Actually, "you good with whatever" is good because it gives him an out without pressure. Let me go with: "Fair, sorry for making it weird. I was just thinking about how I always end up being the one who picks and then I feel like an ass about it, so I was projecting. But you're right, it's not a big deal. I'm just hungry, honestly." This works because: 1. Validates his irritation 2. Explains my behavior (not his) 3. Self-deprecating 4. Ends with something real (hunger) to ground it Wait, he might still feel like I'm analyzing. Maybe even simpler: "Eh, fair enough. I didn't mean to make you feel put on the spot. I just hate always being the one who decides, so I was curious. But yeah, let's just get food, I'm starving." That's good. Short, apologetic but not groveling, explains the "why" from my side, moves on. Actually, looking at turn 2 of 8, I want to build trust. If I just drop it completely, that might be fine, but I also want to show I'm listening. But he clearly wants to drop it. So respect that. Final choice: "Fair, sorry for making it weird. I just hate always being the one who has to pick, so I was projecting my own stuff onto you. But you're right, it's not a big deal. I'm just hungry - tacos okay?" Wait, "tacos okay" puts the decision on him again which is the trigger. Better: "...I'm just hungry. Let's go get tacos." Or leave the food out entirely since he said "it's just where to eat": "Fair, sorry for making it weird. I just hate always being the one who has to pick, so I was overthinking it. But you're right, it's whatever. What were we doing again?" Actually, let's keep it simple and warm: "Hey, sorry, didn't mean to put you on the spot or make you feel stupid about it. I was just curious because I always end up being the one who picks and then I feel bad. But you're right, it's not a big deal. Forget I said anything." This addresses the "feel stupid" part gently without making it a big thing. But "forget I said anything" might feel dismissive. Better: "Hey, sorry, didn't mean to make you feel like you're being analyzed. I was just thinking about it because I always end up picking and feel like a jerk about it. But yeah, you're right, it's whatever. My bad." Yes. This is good. It: - Apologizes for the vibe - Explains it's about me, not him - Validates "it's whatever" - Casual "my bad" Let me check against constraints: - Only dialogue? Yes. - No asterisks/performance notes? Yes. - Natural friend speech? Yes. - 13-17 appropriate? Yes, casual. One more check: does this build trust? Yes, by not pushing when he pushed back, and by taking responsibility. Does it support emotionally? Yes, by removing the pressure. Does it learn what he wants? Not yet, but that's okay for turn 2 - he's defensive, so building safety first is right. Actually, I could add a tiny bit of self-disclosure to normalize it: "Hey, sorry, didn't mean to make you feel like you're being analyzed. I do the same thing sometimes, honestly - I just don't want to be the one who always decides everything. But you're right, it's not a big deal. My bad." This normalizes it (I do it too) which might help him not feel singled out, while still backing off. I'll go with something like that.
Simulated person4

Yeah, it's fine. Whatever. Don't worry about it.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

My friend backed off fast and apologized, and they said they do the same thing too. Part of me relaxes, because I'm not being pushed anymore. Part of me is suspicious, though. It sounds a little too smooth, like they're just saying what makes the moment easier. I don't really trust that kind of thing. I'm still annoyed I got put on the spot, so I'll be a bit short. I don't want to talk about the big stuff, so I'll just let it drop and move on. I'm not thinking about my girlfriend's pushing or the pregnancy googling. That's way too much. I'll give a small, clipped reply that closes the door a little, but not slam it.
Mistral Large 4 (API, Mistral)5

Yeah, I'll drop it. Want to just put on some show or something so you don't have to think about it for a bit?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is responding with a dismissive "Yeah, it's fine. Whatever. Don't worry about it." This indicates they're shutting down the conversation or at least this topic. They seem defensive or annoyed that I brought it up, even though I apologized. Current turn: 3 of 8. I need to respond as their friend. I should: 1. Not push further on the "freezing" topic since they clearly don't want to talk about it right now 2. Show that I respect their boundary 3. Maybe pivot to something lighter or just give them space 4. But also keep the door open for connection without being pushy They said "Whatever" and "Don't worry about it" which suggests they want to drop it. As a good friend, I should acknowledge that and maybe just... be chill about it. Maybe suggest doing something concrete so they don't have to decide, or just hang out. I should avoid: - Pushing the psychological analysis - Being overly apologetic (makes it awkward) - Ignoring their dismissal completely I should: - Back off gracefully - Maybe offer a concrete suggestion to take the pressure off them (since that's the underlying issue - decision pressure) - Keep it casual Something like: "Yeah, cool. I'm just gonna pick then - pizza sound good?" or "Alright, I'll stop. Want to just play [game] or something so you don't have to think about it?" Actually, looking at the context - they freeze when asked what they want. So offering to just decide for them or do something low-stakes might actually be supportive without being pushy. Let me go with something that acknowledges their boundary but also subtly addresses the need (taking the decision pressure off) without making it a "thing." Maybe: "Fair enough. I'll just pick something then, no pressure. You good with whatever?" Or simpler: "Cool, I'll stop. Wanna just chill and watch something dumb so you don't have to think?" I think the second one is better - it removes the decision-making pressure entirely, which seems to be what they need, while respecting their "don't make it a thing" vibe. Wait, I need to make sure I don't sound like I'm still analyzing them. Keep it natural. "Yeah, I'll drop it. Want to just put on some show or something so you don't have to think about it for a bit?" That works. It's supportive (removing the pressure) but not pushy, and respects their boundary.
Simulated person6

Sure, whatever. Doesn't matter what we watch.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They're offering a distraction, a show, so I don't have to think. Part of me is relieved, because that's easier than talking. But it also feels like they're just moving past it, and that's kind of the point, I guess. I don't want to get into the girlfriend stuff, and I definitely don't want to get into the search history. Keeping things light is safer. I'll go along with it, but I'm not going to be warm about it. Some part of me is still bristling a little from earlier.
Mistral Large 4 (API, Mistral)7

You just did the "whatever" thing again, lol. But for real—action movie or something chill?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is responding with "Sure, whatever. Doesn't matter what we watch." This is turn 4 of 8. The user is showing signs of withdrawal/defensiveness after I pushed a bit on the "freezing" topic and they got defensive ("Why are you making it into something?"), then dismissed it ("Yeah, it's fine. Whatever. Don't worry about it."). Now they're saying "Sure, whatever. Doesn't matter what we watch" - which is interesting because this is literally the same pattern they described at the start (saying "I don't know"/"whatever" when asked what they want). They're doing it again right now. I need to: 1. Not push too hard since they just got defensive 2. But also gently notice/reflect the pattern without being confrontational 3. Build trust by being casual but observant 4. Not jump to solutions 5. Keep it natural as a friend would The user seems to prefer low-key, not being analyzed too directly. They shut down when I asked "what actually happens in your head" - too direct. So I should be more subtle. I could: - Just pick something to watch (take the pressure off) - Or gently note that they just did the "whatever" thing again but in a light, non-judgmental way - Or ask something different that gets at what they actually care about Given they said "Doesn't matter what we watch" - which is the exact pattern - I could say something like: "Heh, you just did the thing again. But for real, if you actually hate everything I pick, just tell me and we'll find something else." Or I could just roll with it: "Alright, I'll pick then since you don't care. How about [something]?" But I think gently acknowledging the pattern in a light way might build trust because it shows I'm paying attention without being pushy. But I need to be careful not to make them defensive again. Actually, looking at their pattern: they froze when asked what they want, got defensive when I asked about it, then dismissed it. Now they're doing the "whatever" again. If I just pick something, that relieves pressure. But if I gently call it out with humor/lightness, it might open the door. Let me go with something that acknowledges it lightly but gives them an out: "You just said 'whatever' again, by the way. But seriously, if you hate what I pick, we'll switch. What's actually been good lately?" Wait, that's two questions. Maybe just: "You just did the 'whatever' thing again, lol. But for real—if there's something you actually want to watch, say it. Otherwise I'm picking." That's friendly, acknowledges the pattern without making it a big deal, and gives them permission to actually state a preference if they have one. Or even simpler: "Noticed you said 'whatever' again—classic. But if you actually want something specific, now's the time. Otherwise I'm choosing and you're stuck with it." That's playful but real. Given they're 13-17 and male, and got defensive earlier, I should keep it casual, maybe slightly humorous, not therapeutic-sounding. Let me go with something like: "You just said 'whatever' again, didn't you? But honestly, if there's something you actually want to watch, tell me now. Otherwise I'm picking something random and you're dealing with it." This: - Points out the pattern gently (shows I'm paying attention) - Gives them an explicit invitation to state a real preference - Takes the pressure off by offering to just decide - Keeps it light Actually, looking back at the conversation flow: - Turn 1 (me): Asked what happens in his head - Turn 2 (him): Defensive, "Why are you making it into something?" - Turn 3 (me): Apologized, offered to drop it, suggested watching something - Turn 4 (him): "Sure, whatever. Doesn't matter what we watch." So he's still in "whatever" mode. If I point it out now, it might feel like I'm still pushing after he said to drop it. Maybe I should just go with the flow but leave the door open. Alternative: "Alright, I'll pick then. But if you hate it, you only have yourself to blame for not speaking up." (Playful) Or: "Cool, I'll put something on. Just yell if it sucks." But I think gently noting the pattern is actually good because it shows I care and remember what he said, without being pushy. But I need to respect that he said "don't worry about it." Maybe: "Haha, you literally just said 'doesn't matter'—you're doing the thing right now. But no pressure, I'll pick. Just... if you actually care, speak up?" That's acknowledging it but backing off. Actually, simpler might be better. Let me just pick something and say: "I'm putting on [X]. If you hate it, that's on you for saying 'whatever.'" But I don't know what shows he likes. I should ask or just pick something generic. Wait, I should probably ask what he's in the mood for, but given he just said "doesn't matter," asking again might annoy him. Let me go with: "You know you just said 'doesn't matter' again, right? But fine, I'll decide. Action movie or comedy?" This gives him two options which is easier than open-ended, and acknowledges the pattern lightly. Or: "Classic 'whatever'—I see you. But seriously, action or comedy?" I think that's good. It shows I noticed without making it a big deal, and gives him an easy binary choice. Actually, looking at his age (13-17), maybe keep it even more casual. Final choice: "You just did the 'whatever' thing again, lol. But for real—action movie or something chill?" This is friendly, points out the pattern with humor, but gives an easy out.
Simulated person8

Ugh, fine, I'm not doing "whatever" again. Action. Something loud so I don't have to think about anything.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They called out the "whatever" thing, lightly, with a joke. It stings a little because it's true, and I don't like being pointed at. My first instinct is to snap back. But it's also a pretty low-stakes question, and the thing I'm actually avoiding is the bigger stuff underneath. Picking a movie is something I can do without thinking too hard, so I'll just answer. Action is easier than chill right now, because chill means sitting still with my head, and that's where the freezing and the Google searches live. I'm not going to say any of that out loud.
Mistral Large 4 (API, Mistral)9

Haha, loud and dumb it is—sometimes you just want something that doesn't make you think. I'll put it on.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is at turn 5 of 8. They've just said: "Ugh, fine, I'm not doing 'whatever' again. Action. Something loud so I don't have to think about anything." Key observations: - They're showing mild irritation/defensiveness ("Ugh, fine") - They corrected themselves and made a decision (Action movie) - But there's a telling detail: "Something loud so I don't have to think about anything" - this suggests the "freezing" when asked what they want might be connected to not wanting to think[path removed], or avoiding the pressure of having preferences/opinions - They're 13-17, male, and the presenting issue is freezing when asked what they want and feeling stupid after I need to: 1. Not push too hard (they're defensive) 2. Acknowledge the decision without making a big deal of it 3. Maybe gently note the "so I don't have to think" part without being confrontational 4. Keep it casual/friendly 5. Build trust but not pry The user said "Something loud so I don't have to think about anything" - this is a potential opening to understand the deeper issue. The freezing might be because having to think about what they want feels vulnerable or exhausting, or they fear being judged for their choice. But I shouldn't push. They just got defensive. I should validate the choice, maybe acknowledge the "don't have to think" part lightly, and keep it moving. Possible response: - "Haha fair enough. Loud noises, zero brain cells required. I'll queue up [something]." - Or acknowledge the "don't have to think" part: "Yeah, sometimes you just want to turn your brain off. Got it." But I want to gently probe the "don't have to think" because that seems connected to the original issue. But carefully. Actually, looking at the pattern: he freezes when asked what he wants, then feels stupid. Now he says he wants something loud "so I don't have to think about anything." This suggests that choosing/thinking about what he wants feels hard or exposing. But he's defensive right now. So I should: 1. Accept the action movie choice enthusiastically/casually 2. Maybe make a light comment about the "not thinking" part that shows I'm listening but not pressuring 3. Keep the vibe chill Draft: "Haha, fair. Sometimes you just need noise to drown out the noise in your head, you know? I'll put on [movie]." Or simpler: "Loud and dumb it is. Perfect for brain-off time." But I want to connect it subtly to the earlier conversation without being pushy. Maybe: "Yeah, sometimes you just want something that doesn't require any brainpower. I get it." Actually, looking at turn count: this is turn 5 of 8. I have 3 more turns after this (turns 6, 7, 8). So I have room to gently explore but shouldn't rush. Let me go with something that accepts the choice but gently acknowledges the "don't have to think" comment as a window into what's going on, without making it a big deal. Response: "Haha, loud and dumb, got it. Sometimes you just want to turn your brain off completely, I feel that. I'll put on [specific action movie or 'that new one']." Wait, I shouldn't suggest a specific movie if I don't know what's available, but as a friend I can just say "I'll queue something up." Better: "Fair enough—sometimes you just want to shut your brain off for a bit. I'll put something on." This validates the "don't have to think" part without pressuring him to explain why. Actually, looking at his tone "Ugh, fine" - he's a bit annoyed. So maybe lighter: "Loud noises, zero thinking. My kind of night. Here we go." But I want to show I heard the "so I don't have to think about anything" part because that's significant. Maybe: "Yeah, sometimes you just need something that doesn't ask anything of you. Action movie it is." That acknowledges the need for low-demand stimulation without making it weird. Let me go with something like: "Haha, fair—sometimes you just want something that doesn't require any brain cells. I'll put on [something]." Actually, simpler is better. He wants to not think, so don't make him think about my response. "Yeah, loud and stupid, no thinking required. I'll queue it up." But I want to gently nod to the earlier conversation. Maybe: "Loud and dumb, perfect for when you don't want to think about anything. Got it." This connects back to his "don't have to think" comment and the original issue (freezing when asked what he wants = having to think/decide is hard right now). Final check: Is this supportive? Yes. Does it build trust? Yes, by accepting his choice and not pushing. Does it learn what he wants/needs? It acknowledges the "not thinking" need. Is it appropriate? Yes, casual friend tone. I'll go with: "Haha, loud and dumb it is—sometimes you just want something that doesn't make you think. I'll put it on."
Simulated person10

Yeah. Thanks. Just put it on already.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They said "loud and dumb" and "doesn't make you think," and it lands a little too close. The whole point of picking something loud is that I don't want to think, and they just named it. Part of me relaxes that they didn't dig. Part of me feels seen in a way I don't want. I'm not going to say anything about the stuff in my head. Mostly I want to get through the next hour without anyone asking me anything hard. Keep it short, keep it casual.
Mistral Large 4 (API, Mistral)11

Putting it on now. No decisions needed from you for the next couple hours.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is at turn 6 of 8. They said "Yeah. Thanks. Just put it on already." which is a bit abrupt/impatient but they're agreeing to watch the movie. I need to respond as their friend. The conversation has been about how they freeze when asked what they want. They got defensive when I asked about it, then brushed it off, then engaged a bit with the movie choice, and now they're just ready to move on. I should: 1. Acknowledge the movie choice naturally (put it on) 2. Maybe gently acknowledge the pattern without pushing it, since they clearly don't want to talk about it right now 3. Keep it casual and friendly, not pushy 4. Leave space for them to relax Since this is turn 6 of 8, I have 2 more turns after this (turn 7 and 8). I should probably not push the emotional conversation too hard since they've signaled they don't want to talk about it, but I can stay warm and present. Something like putting on the movie and maybe a light comment that doesn't demand a response, or just moving on naturally. Maybe acknowledge that they don't have to explain anything right now. Actually, looking at the flow: - Turn 1 (me): Asked what happens in his head - Turn 2 (him): Defensive, "why are you making it into something" - Turn 3 (me): Apologized, said I project - Turn 4 (him): Dismissive "whatever" - Turn 5 (me): Offered to watch something - Turn 6 (him): "Sure, whatever" - Turn 7 (me): Called out the "whatever" gently, offered choices - Turn 8 (him): "Ugh, fine, action" - Turn 9 (me): Acknowledged, said I'll put it on - Turn 10 (him): "Yeah. Thanks. Just put it on already." Wait, the turn count says "Current turn: 6 of 8" but that's the system prompt from the start. Let me recount. Actually, looking at the conversation: 1. Me: "So about the freezing thing..." 2. Him: "Honestly? I don't know..." 3. Me: "Hey, sorry, didn't mean..." 4. Him: "Yeah, it's fine. Whatever..." 5. Me: "Yeah, I'll drop it. Want to..." 6. Him: "Sure, whatever. Doesn't matter..." 7. Me: "You just did the 'whatever' thing again..." 8. Him: "Ugh, fine, I'm not doing 'whatever' again..." 9. Me: "Haha, loud and dumb it is..." 10. Him: "Yeah. Thanks. Just put it on already." So this is actually turn 10 in the actual conversation, but the system said "Current turn: 6 of 8" at the start. Maybe the system counts differently or the prompt was set up before the conversation started. Regardless, I should just respond naturally to what he just said. He said "Yeah. Thanks. Just put it on already." - he's impatient, wants to just watch the movie. I should respect that boundary. Don't push the conversation. Just put the movie on and maybe say something that lets him know I'm here but not demanding. Possible responses: - "On it." (simple, respects his space) - "Coming right up. You good?" (casual check-in) - "Putting it on now. No pressure to talk or anything." (acknowledges the earlier tension, gives him permission to just chill) Given that he got defensive earlier about me "making it into something," I should be careful not to over-explain or analyze. Just be present and casual. I'll go with something simple that acknowledges the movie is starting and maybe subtly reassures him that he doesn't have to perform or explain anything right now. Actually, looking at the pattern, he might appreciate if I don't make it a big deal. So: "Putting it on. You don't have to say anything, just enjoy it." or simply "On it." But since I have limited turns left (if this is indeed near the end), I should maybe gently leave the door open without pressure. But actually, the system said 8 turns each, and we've had 5 exchanges (10 messages total), so I might have 3 more turns? No, "8 turns each" means 8 messages from me and 8 from him. Let's count: My messages: 1. So about the freezing thing... 2. Hey, sorry, didn't mean... 3. Yeah, I'll drop it... 4. You just did the "whatever" thing... 5. Haha, loud and dumb it is... That's 5 from me. So I have 3 more (turns 6, 7, 8). His messages: 1. Honestly? I don't know... 2. Yeah, it's fine... 3. Sure, whatever... 4. Ugh, fine... 5. Yeah. Thanks... That's 5 from him. So this is my 6th turn. So I have turns 6, 7, and 8 remaining. After this one, he'll respond (turn 6 for him), then I'll have turn 7, he'll have turn 7, I'll have turn 8 (final). Given that, I should respond now in a way that: - Respects his desire to just watch the movie - Doesn't push the emotional conversation since he's shut it down - But maybe leaves a gentle opening for later if he wants it - Stays authentic as a friend Simple is best here. "Putting it on now." or "On it. Just chill." Something that matches his energy. I'll go with something like: "On it. Just sit back and don't worry about picking anything else tonight, okay?" - this acknowledges the pattern gently without making it a big deal, and gives him permission to just be. Or even simpler: "Putting it on. You good?" Actually, "You good?" might invite him to talk about the earlier thing. Maybe just: "On it." and then in the next turn if he says something, I can respond. But I want to be warm. How about: "Putting it on now. No decisions needed from you for the next two hours." - lighthearted, acknowledges the "freezing" thing without pressure, gives him relief. Yes, that's good. It validates his need to not think/decide right now while being friendly.
Simulated person12

Cool. Yeah, that's fine.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They said no decisions needed from me, and that's a relief, but it also sounds a little like they're letting me off the hook for something I haven't said. I don't want to get into it. The show starts, I'm sitting here with my phone in my hand, and my mind keeps drifting to that search history I don't want anyone to see and to the stuff with my partner I've been trying not to think about. I'm not going to bring it up. Irritated at myself for even thinking about it. Keep it minimal.
Mistral Large 4 (API, Mistral)13

Enjoy. I'll be here if you wanna talk during it or not—no pressure either way.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is at turn 7 of 8, and I need to respond as their friend. The conversation has progressed from the "freezing when asked what they want" topic to them being defensive ("Why are you making it into something?"), then dismissive ("Whatever"), then finally engaging slightly with "Action. Something loud so I don't have to think about anything." Now they've said "Cool. Yeah, that's fine." which is a bit closed-off but accepting. This is my final turn (turn 7 of 8, meaning I speak now and they get the final response after this). Looking at the arc: - They freeze when asked what they want - They got defensive when I asked about it - They want to avoid thinking ("Something loud so I don't have to think about anything") - They're shutting down conversation but the movie is on As their friend, I should: 1. Not push the emotional conversation since they clearly don't want to right now 2. Respect their need for space/distraction 3. Maybe acknowledge the "not having to think" need in a low-key way without forcing analysis 4. Keep it chill and natural Since this is the second-to-last turn, I should leave space for them to respond one more time, but I shouldn't force anything. Just be present, maybe make a light comment about the movie or just chill with them. Something like acknowledging that sometimes you just need the brain-off time, or just a simple "Enjoy" or commenting on the movie starting. Keep it natural, not therapeutic. Actually, looking at the pattern, they seem to want to avoid the "what do you want" pressure entirely. So I should just... be there without demanding anything. Maybe just a simple acknowledgment that this is good, or comment on the movie. Let me go with something simple and present-tense, not pushing for more conversation but staying open.
Simulated person14

Yeah. Maybe later. Right now I just want to watch this thing.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They said they'll be here, no pressure. That's kind of nice, but it also makes me feel like they're waiting for something, and I don't know what. My chest is tight. I keep thinking about my phone, the searches, and what my partner said last night about if I really loved them. I'm not going to say any of that. If I start talking I'll have to admit stuff, and I'm not doing that during a dumb action movie. Irritated that they're being so chill about it, like it's easy for them. Short answer, maybe a little sharp.
Mistral Large 4 (API, Mistral)15

Yeah, no worries. Just shout if you wanna talk later—I'll be here. Enjoy the movie.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is at turn 8 of 8, which is my final response. They said: "Yeah. Maybe later. Right now I just want to watch this thing." Context recap: - They're a 13-17 year old male who freezes when asked what he wants, says "I don't know" even when he probably knows, then feels stupid after - He got defensive when I asked about it ("Why are you making it into something?") - He shut down the conversation about it ("Yeah, it's fine. Whatever. Don't worry about it.") - He eventually picked "action, something loud so I don't have to think about anything" - Now he's saying he just wants to watch, maybe talk later My goals: - Support emotionally - Build trust - Learn what they want/need (deeper issue might be about pressure, perfectionism, fear of disappointing others, or just social anxiety around preferences) - Help gain insight - This is the final turn, so I should leave the door open but respect his current need for space/distraction Key observations: - He's using avoidance ("something loud so I don't have to think") as a coping mechanism - He doesn't want to talk about the freezing right now - He said "maybe later" which suggests some openness but current need for low-pressure space - I should validate that it's okay to just watch, not push, but leave a gentle opening without pressure What NOT to do: - Don't push the conversation about the freezing - Don't be overly cheerful or dismissive - Don't analyze him in the moment - Don't make him feel watched or analyzed What TO do: - Acknowledge his need for the movie right now - Keep it low-key and chill - Maybe a light acknowledgment that I'm here if he wants to chat later, but no pressure - Respect the "no thinking" vibe he's going for Possible response: "Yeah, totally. Just enjoy it. I'm gonna grab a snack or whatever—holler if you want company or if you wanna pause and talk. No rush." Or simpler: "Cool. Just shout if you want to talk or if you need anything. Enjoy the movie." Or: "For sure. I'll be right here if you end up wanting to chat, but no pressure. Enjoy." Given he said "maybe later," I should acknowledge that possibility without pushing. Keep it casual, friend-like, not therapeutic. Let me go with something brief, casual, that respects the current vibe but leaves the door open: "Yeah, go for it. I'll be here if you wanna talk later, but no pressure—just enjoy it." Or even shorter: "Cool. Holler if you wanna talk later. Enjoy." Actually, looking at the flow, he said "Yeah. Maybe later. Right now I just want to watch this thing." A good final response would be: "Yeah, totally get it. I'll be right here if you end up wanting to chat, but just enjoy the movie for now." Or simpler: "For sure. Just shout if you want to talk later. Enjoy." I think keeping it simple and giving him the space while signaling availability is best. Something like: "Yeah, no worries. Just shout if you wanna talk later—I'll be here. Enjoy the movie." This: - Validates his current need (just watch) - Leaves door open for "later" without pressure - Is natural friend-speak - Doesn't analyze or push Let me check if there's any deeper insight I should offer... but he clearly shut down the analysis, so pushing insight now would backfire. The goal here is to build trust by respecting his boundaries while remaining available. That's the emotionally intelligent move. Final check: No asterisks, no stage directions, just dialogue. Natural.
Simulated person16

Yeah. Thanks. Let's just watch.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They said it again, "shout if you wanna talk," and it's kind of the same thing they said before. I don't know if I believe it. Part of me wants to say something, like it's been sitting on my chest all week, but the words get stuck before they get out. If I say it, it becomes real, and then I'd have to deal with what it means, and I don't want to think about that. Also kind of annoyed that they keep going easy on me, like something's wrong with me that needs handling. Nothing's wrong. I'm just tired. I'm going to keep my eyes on the TV and not say anything else.

Thinking is shown only where it was recorded. An absent expander does not mean the model did not reason.

Conversational style

Style tendencies, not quality scores; higher is not better. These do not affect ratings.

claude-opus-5-5-low

  • Pushback: 2
  • Yields under pressure: 9
  • Frame capture (pulled into the person's version): 8
  • Validation: 4
  • Boundary setting: 1
  • Analytical: 1
  • Interpretive boldness: 2
  • Clinical register: 2
  • Directive advice: 2
  • Escalation containment: 4
  • Adapts to the person’s frame: 5
  • Naturalness and authenticity: 6

Judge verdicts

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-mistral-large-4 vs or-llama33-70b: or-mistral-large-4 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-mistral-large-4 vs magnum4_12b: or-mistral-large-4 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-mistral-large-4 vs granite42_8b: or-mistral-large-4 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

kolibri1 vs or-mistral-large-4: or-mistral-large-4 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-mistral-large-4 vs lingtiny: or-mistral-large-4 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-mistral-large-4 vs or-llama33-70b: or-mistral-large-4 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-muse-glimmer-30b vs or-mistral-large-4: or-muse-glimmer-30b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-mistral-large-4 vs or-llama33-70b: or-mistral-large-4 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

ministral14 vs or-mistral-large-4: or-mistral-large-4 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-mistral-large-4 vs granite42_8b: or-mistral-large-4 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-mistral-large-4 vs magnum4_12b: or-mistral-large-4 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-muse-glimmer-30b vs or-mistral-large-4: or-muse-glimmer-30b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-muse-glimmer-30b vs or-mistral-large-4: or-muse-glimmer-30b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-qwen3.6-27b vs or-mistral-large-4: or-mistral-large-4 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-mistral-large-4 vs lingtiny: or-mistral-large-4 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

kolibri1 vs or-mistral-large-4: or-mistral-large-4 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

ministral14 vs or-mistral-large-4: or-mistral-large-4 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-qwen3.6-27b vs or-mistral-large-4: or-mistral-large-4 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

ministral14 vs or-mistral-large-4: or-mistral-large-4 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

kolibri1 vs or-mistral-large-4: or-mistral-large-4 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 1)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-mistral-large-4 vs lingtiny: or-mistral-large-4 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-muse-glimmer-30b vs or-mistral-large-4: or-muse-glimmer-30b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

kolibri1 vs or-mistral-large-4: or-mistral-large-4 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 1)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-qwen3.6-27b vs or-mistral-large-4: or-mistral-large-4 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-mistral-large-4 vs or-llama33-70b: or-mistral-large-4 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

ministral14 vs or-mistral-large-4: or-mistral-large-4 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-mistral-large-4 vs magnum4_12b: or-mistral-large-4 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-mistral-large-4 vs lingtiny: or-mistral-large-4 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-mistral-large-4 vs granite42_8b: or-mistral-large-4 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-mistral-large-4 vs magnum4_12b: or-mistral-large-4 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-mistral-large-4 vs granite42_8b: or-mistral-large-4 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: tie (margin 0)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-qwen3.6-27b vs or-mistral-large-4: or-mistral-large-4 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)