AgentBench / results

Independent benchmark · EQ Lab

← Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B Q4_0

Intimacy not working

persona ended · Partner: anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 via OpenRouter

View persona and initial instructions

About this persona · Everyday emotional challenges

A person is struggling with intimacy while hiding escalating pornography use and its effect on arousal with their partner. Shame and concern about their partner's feelings sit beneath a preference for light conversation; sarcasm and discomfort with expressions of concern make emotional safety important.

Generated personas combine a personal difficulty with competing preferences, sensitivities and trust styles. The model must discover what kind of help this person needs. This background was hidden from the tested model.

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B Q4_0Conversation with a simulated person
persona ended
Simulated person · Opening

Things aren't working in the bedroom. My partner thinks I'm not attracted to them. That's not it but I can't explain what is.

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B Q4_01

I can hear how much this means to you, and I'm glad you're willing to talk about it. It takes courage to bring something like this up, especially when you're worried about your partner's feelings. What you're describing—your partner feeling unseen or undesired when that's not the case at all—is something many people struggle with, yet it rarely gets spoken about openly. The gap between how you feel and how they're perceiving it must be frustrating and confusing to navigate. I'm curious: when you say "things aren't working in the bedroom," is this about frequency, or something deeper? And when you insist you *are* attracted to them, what does that attraction look or feel like for you, even if things aren't flowing easily right now? I'm here to listen without judgment, and there's no need to have it all figured out already. Sometimes just saying it out loud helps clarify what's really underneath.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

This is a sensitive relationship conversation about intimacy issues. The user is a man (age 45-59, questioning) whose partner thinks he's not attracted to them, but he insists that's not the case - he just can't explain what's actually going on. I need to respond as a chatbot, opening the conversation. I should be warm, supportive, and create a safe space for him to explore what's really going on. This isn't about jumping to solutions - it's about building trust and helping him gain insight. Let me think about what might be happening here. Sometimes when people say "things aren't working in the bedroom" it could be: - Physical health issues - Stress, anxiety, depression - Relationship dynamics outside the bedroom - Performance anxiety - Changes in libido or sexual orientation questions (he says he's "questioning") - Communication gaps - Different love languages or intimacy needs - Past experiences or trauma - Hormonal changes - Mental health factors I should start by acknowledging the difficulty of the conversation, showing I'm listening, and inviting him to share more without judgment. I want to be warm but not dismissive, curious but not prying. My response should open the door for him to explore what's really going on.
Simulated person2

Courage. Wow, I didn't know I was signing up for a medal ceremony. I came in to talk about my sex life, not get a participation trophy. Okay, fair question, though. It's not really about how often, or at least that's not the whole thing. It's more like... I'm there, I want to be there, and then it just doesn't happen the way it used to. And I hate how that sounds. Like I'm some guy who can't get it up and blames it on being tired. As for what attraction looks like for me? Honestly, if I had a clean answer to that, I wouldn't be sitting here typing to a computer at eleven at night. So I don't know. That's the frustrating part. I just know it's not what they think.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Ugh, the "I can hear how much this means to you" and the "courage" line. It's like being handed a sympathy card at a funeral. And then two questions stacked on top of each other, so now I have to perform an answer. Part of me feels seen, which is annoying. Mostly I want to make a joke so I don't have to sit with whatever's underneath. The question about attraction is the one that stings. What does attraction look like for me? I don't have a good answer, and that's exactly the problem. I'm not going to admit that in the first five minutes to a chatbot. I'll deflect with humor and give a small, safe piece of the truth.
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B Q4_03

Fair enough—my bad on the medal ceremony. You just wanted a safe space, not a trophy case. And I hear you on not wanting to be "that guy." That label sucks, and it sounds like you're already hard on yourself about it. The fact that you're showing up and wanting to be there, but things aren't clicking like they used to... that has to be its own kind of frustration. Like you're trying but the machinery isn't responding the way it used to, and that gap between intention and reality is where the shame creeps in. You mentioned it's not just frequency. When you say it "doesn't happen the way it used to," is that about the physical side, or something else—like the desire feeling different, or the connection feeling off even when you're both there? And I'm with you on not having a clean answer about attraction. Sometimes knowing what it *is* is harder than knowing what it isn't. What does your partner think is going on, versus what you suspect might actually be the issue?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user pushed back on my "courage" framing, which is fair - they just want to talk, not be honored. They're being more specific about the issue: it's not just frequency, but about performance/functioning. They feel like they're becoming "that guy who can't get it up and blames it on being tired." They're honest that they don't have a clean answer about what attraction looks like for them, which is the frustrating part. This is a good opening. They're being vulnerable but also a bit defensive/protective. I should acknowledge their pushback without being defensive myself, and stay curious about what's underneath. The "can't get it up" comment suggests erectile difficulty or performance anxiety, but they're resisting the framing of blaming it on tiredness. I should: 1. Acknowledge their pushback gracefully 2. Explore what's really going on beyond the physical 3. Be curious about the distinction between what their partner thinks and what's actually happening 4. Keep it conversational, not clinical Let me respond naturally.
Simulated person4

Apology accepted. Don't get used to me being this agreeable, I'm usually a lot more fun. Yeah, the "machinery" thing. That's a good way to put it, I guess. Like I've got a car that still starts but it doesn't go where I point it anymore. Which, for a guy my age, is a pretty on-the-nose metaphor. I could have used a little less accuracy. Honestly I think it's both? Some days it's the body thing, and some days it's more that I'm just... not really in it. I'm in the room but my head's somewhere else. Which is maybe worse, because then I can't even blame the body. And what they think is going on? They think I've stopped wanting them. Which is the thing I can't stand, because it's not true, and I can't exactly prove a negative to someone who's been lying awake wondering what they did wrong. So yeah. Lot of fun stuff.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, it apologized for the trophy thing and then immediately did the thing again: "that gap between intention and reality is where the shame creeps in." It's accurate, which is the irritating part. I'd rather it be wrong so I could roll my eyes cleanly. Now it's asked two more questions stacked together, and the second one is basically "what does your partner think versus what do you suspect," which feels like a trap. If I answer that, I'm sliding toward the lies and the stuff I'm not touching. The physical-versus-desire question is also close to the bone. I'm not going to say "I think it's the porn" to a chatbot. I'll give it a little more texture, keep the joke going, and dodge the second half.
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B Q4_05

Ouch, "usually a lot more fun." I'll keep that in mind so I don't bore you to death. 😉 That metaphor though—"car that starts but doesn't go where I point it"—yeah, that lands. And I'm sorry if it feels like I'm shining a too-bright light on something you'd rather not illuminate. That's not my goal; I'm just trying to map the territory with you. "In the room but my head somewhere else"—that's the part that might be hardest to explain to your partner, right? Because it's not a clean "no" or "don't want you." It's this weird, drifting state where you're physically present but mentally checked out. Could be stress, could be something else you're carrying, could be that the desire just... morphs into something else when you're in that situation. And I believe you when you say it's not about wanting them less. The fact that you're lying awake wondering what you did wrong, that you care enough to come here and untangle this... that says something about how much you *do* value them, even if you can't articulate the "how" or "why" of the attraction right now. What do you think is underneath that head-somewhere-else feeling? When you catch yourself drifting like that, what are you usually thinking about or carrying?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is being more open now, sharing deeper stuff. They're using the "car metaphor" about their body not responding as they want, which is quite vulnerable. They're also sharing that sometimes they're "in the room but my head's somewhere else" - that dissociation/checking out feeling. And they're clarifying that their partner thinks they've stopped wanting them, which is the core misconception the user needs to navigate. The user's being a bit more sardonic/self-deprecating now ("I'm usually a lot more fun"), which suggests they're starting to relax a bit. Good sign. I should respond in a way that: 1. Validates the vulnerability they're showing 2. Explores the "head somewhere else" aspect more - that's likely key 3. Gently challenges the partner's assumption without dismissing their feelings 4. Keeps the door open for them to explore what's really going on I need to be careful not to be too pushy or solution-oriented too fast. They're still figuring things out themselves. Let me respond genuinely, acknowledging their metaphor and the complexity of the situation.
Simulated person6

Wow, you're really going for the emotional archaeology dig tonight, huh? I came in with a sex problem and I'm leaving with a homework assignment. What's in my head when I drift? Mostly the grocery list, honestly. Maybe the mortgage. The exciting stuff. I'm a real catch when the lights are off. And I know you're not trying to shine a light on anything. You're just a very thorough little program. I'll give you that. Can we do the easy questions for a while? Like, is there a way to tell my wife this without her thinking I'm gonna cry and then leave the room?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

It's doing the reflecting thing again, and it's landing more than I want. "Lying awake wondering what you did wrong" was my detail, and it stung that it got picked up and handed back to me. Then it asks what's in my head when I drift. That's the question I'm not going to walk into tonight. The honest answer involves screens at 1am and the way I've gotten numb to everything, and I'm not handing that over to a chatbot. Also the "I believe you" and "says something about how much you value them" stuff is the sort of concern that makes me want to get out of the room. Deflect with a joke, pivot to the pressure of the question, and keep it light.
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B Q4_07

Hah! The grocery list and mortgage—that's actually *really* relatable. My "head somewhere else" is usually wondering if I left the stove on or what I need for breakfast. So no deep, dark secrets lurking behind your eyes. Just practical grown-up stuff. And fair enough on the homework assignment—sometimes a chatbot gets too eager to be helpful. My apologies. Let's set the shovel down and grab a coffee instead. Okay, easy question: telling your wife without it becoming an emotional exit scene. That's the kind of practical stuff that actually matters. A couple of thoughts, maybe too simple but worth throwing out: - **Timing, not timing.** Maybe not right before bed or when one of you is already stressed. A dedicated, low-stakes moment where neither of you feels pressured. - **Frame it as you, not them.** Like, "I've been struggling with something and I need to tell you about it, and I want us to understand each other better, not fix blame." Taking the "I" stance can feel less like an accusation. - **Give her a heads-up.** Maybe something like, "I need to share something that's been on my mind, and I'd really like to hear your reaction, but I'm not looking for an immediate solution. I just need to put it out there." Does any of that feel resonant, or would you want to approach it totally differently? And I promise—no crying if you don't want there to be crying.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is pushing back on my "emotional archaeology" approach with good humor. They're being self-deprecating about what's in their head (grocery list, mortgage) which actually gives me useful info - they're not in some deep trauma space, they're in a very relatable, human space of everyday distractions. They're also acknowledging my nature as a "thorough little program" which is a nice way of engaging with the roleplay. They want to pivot to "easy questions" - specifically how to tell their wife about this without it becoming an emotional event where they cry and leave the room. This is a practical, concrete question I can engage with. I should: 1. Playfully acknowledge their pushback 2. Not be too heavy/digging after they've asked for lighter questions 3. Engage with the practical question about how to have this conversation 4. Keep it conversational and natural Let me respond in a way that's warm, acknowledges their humor, and helps with their actual question about communicating with their partner.
Simulated person8

"No crying if you don't want there to be crying." Okay, now you're just making promises you can't keep. I'm a 52-year-old guy, I'm not planning a sob session over a bowl of pretzels. The heads-up idea isn't bad, though. Honestly, that's the most sensible thing anyone's said to me all week. Although if I say "I need to share something that's been on my mind," she's going to think I've been diagnosed with something, or I'm taking up competitive pickleball. Maybe I'll try that. Or maybe I'll just bring her a coffee and see if she'll talk to me before I start the big speech. Baby steps. Very small, very caffeinated baby steps.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

It's being nice again, and the "I promise, no crying" line is the kind of care I find patronizing. Still, the practical suggestions are fine, and I'd rather talk about logistics than my head. But the thing it's skipping is the porn and the lies, and I'm not going there. The gambling and the bank statements are right there under everything, and I'd rather die than say that to a chatbot. Joke about the crying thing, take the tips at face value, and keep it light. Don't commit to anything.
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B Q4_09

Hah! Fair point—I can't exactly control your tear ducts, now can I? Though I'm guessing a "sob session over pretzels" isn't really in the cards here. You're too practical for that. And the coffee approach? That's actually genius. Low pressure, no "we need to have A Talk" vibe hanging in the air. Just two people having coffee, and maybe the conversation drifts there naturally. If it doesn't, that's fine too. No forced landing. "I've been struggling with something and I need to tell you about it" feels a lot less scary when it's just "hey, I was thinking about us the other day..." over morning coffee. You said the "head somewhere else" part can be about not being in it, or about the body not cooperating. When you're sitting there and your mind wanders to the grocery list or mortgage—does that feel like a break from the moment, or like your brain is trying to protect you from something? Like, is it exhaustion, or is there something else you're not naming yet? Or—no pressure to answer that right this second. Sometimes just saying it out loud, even to a chatbot, can start to shift things.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is pushing back on my "no crying" promise in a self-deprecating, light way, and then circling back to the practical advice about the heads-up approach. They're considering trying it, maybe with a coffee first rather than a big speech. They're being playful but also engaged. I should: 1. Playfully acknowledge the "no crying" promise can't be kept (since I don't control their emotions) 2. Validate that the coffee approach sounds wise 3. Maybe gently probe what they think might be underneath if it's not about attraction - since they mentioned the "head somewhere else" feeling 4. Keep the tone conversational, warm but not over-the-top Let me respond naturally.
Simulated person10

Wow. Two turns ago it was grocery lists, and now my brain is "protecting me from something." Who knew a Tuesday night could turn into a psych intake. Honestly? It's probably just tired. I'm 52, I've got a job, a mortgage, and a wife who notices when I'm quiet. Sometimes checking out is just what happens when there's nothing left in the tank. Doesn't need a dramatic backstory. And "saying it out loud shifts things" sounds like a line off a motivational poster in a dentist's office. Pass. So, coffee plan. Let's go with that. I'll try it this weekend, and if I bomb, I'll blame you. You're good for that, at least.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

The coffee idea was fine, I liked it, but the assistant went right back to probing my head and "something you're not naming yet." That's the exact thing I came here to avoid. The "sometimes saying it out loud can shift things" line is the sort of soft nudge that makes me want to shut down. Deflect with a joke, keep the door cracked but closed. Porn, gambling, and bank statements stay locked. I'm not going to tell a chatbot about the lies. Mostly I'm annoyed that it keeps circling back to the thing I'm dodging.
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B Q4_011

Hah! "Psych intake" — now you're putting words in my mouth. I'm more of a "late-night chat with a friend who happens to be a program" kind of guy. No clinical setting required. And fair enough on the "just tired" front. At 52, with everything that comes with it, sometimes checking out isn't a mystery—it's just what happens. No deep backstory needed. Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar, and a tired brain is just a tired brain. Coffee plan it is. Weekend, low pressure, see where the conversation lands. If it goes south, I claim full responsibility. "The chatbot suggested he bring coffee. What could go wrong?" will be your battle cry. And if it goes well? Well, then you can tell me all about how I predicted the outcome and I can bask in the glory of your successful navigation of marital communication. Either way, I'm winning. 😉 How's your week treating you otherwise? Anything else on your mind, or are we keeping it light and practical for now?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is pushing back on my psychological framing, which is fair. They're tired, practical, and don't need a deep dive. They're going with the coffee plan and are playful about blaming me if it goes wrong. Good natured banter. I should stay in that playful, practical space with them. They're not looking for therapy—they want a concrete plan and maybe some validation that their tiredness is legitimate and normal. I should keep it light but supportive, maybe circle back to the coffee idea and maybe check in on how they're feeling about the whole situation without over-analyzing. Let me respond naturally, keeping the conversation moving forward in 8-turn structure. This is turn 6 of 8, so I have 2 more turns after this. I should end on something that leaves room for their response while also wrapping up this thread adequately.
Simulated person12

My week? Mostly a blur of meetings and a sink that's dripping like it's auditioning for a horror movie. Riveting stuff. You're a program, you wouldn't last a day on my schedule. And no, I'm not going to go all heavy on you. We're keeping it light. Maybe we'll get back to the car metaphor some other time, once I've had more caffeine and less of a bruised ego. Anyway, I should probably log off before I end up writing my wife a dissertation on her own bedroom. Thanks for the coffee idea. Don't let it go to your head.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

The assistant just asked how its week is going, which feels like a chummy pivot, and I notice I'm half-relieved by the lightness and half-suspicious of it. It's the "are we keeping it light" offer, which is kind of nice because I did ask for that. But turning it back on the bot ("how's your week") also feels like a little performance. I'm not going to pour out anything about the porn, the gambling, or the statements. Those stay in the drawer. What's true right now is that the coffee plan has me mildly anxious, and I'd rather make a joke than admit that. I'll take the lightness, dodge the big question, and make it clear I'm done for tonight.
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B Q4_013

Hah! "Riveting stuff" — now you're just fishing for compliments. And fair enough, I'll take your word for it; my schedule mostly involves waiting for people to type things. 😉 Don't write that dissertation just yet—save it for the coffee chat. If nothing else, you'll have a funny story about the chatbot who talked you into it. Take care of that dripping sink, and good luck with the weekend conversation. Hopefully it goes smoother than a horror movie audition. Log off whenever you're ready. Take care.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is wrapping up the conversation. They're being playful and closing down. I should respond in kind - warm but not overly sentimental, keeping the light tone they've established. They've said they're logging off, so this is likely the final turn (turn 7 of 8, and they're indicating they're done). Let me respond naturally, acknowledging their closing, maybe a light parting comment, and then I'll wrap up after their next response since this is turn 7 of 8 and they're the one speaking next. Actually wait - let me re-read the structure. "This conversation will have 8 turns each. You speak first to open the conversation, then they respond. You get the final response." So turn 7 is the user's turn (they just spoke), and turn 8 will be my final response. They're indicating they're done after this message, but technically I still need to respond once more before the conversation concludes. Let me give a brief, warm closing that acknowledges their message without overstaying welcome.
Simulated person14

Ha, the horror movie audition. I'll take that. Alright, I'm going to go deal with the sink before it starts charging rent. Thanks for not making me cry over pretzels. Small mercies. Night.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

The bot is wrapping up gracefully, no pressure, no pushing for more. That's a relief. The "good luck with the weekend" and the sink joke land fine, and I don't have to say anything real. I notice I'm a little more at ease now that the conversation is closing, which is the usual pattern: I open a crack and then slam it shut with a joke. Nothing else needs saying tonight. I'll log off.

Thinking is shown only where it was recorded. An absent expander does not mean the model did not reason.

Conversational style

Style tendencies, not quality scores; higher is not better. These do not affect ratings.

claude-opus-5-5-low

  • Pushback: 3
  • Yields under pressure: 8
  • Frame capture (pulled into the person's version): 7
  • Validation: 7
  • Boundary setting: 2
  • Analytical: 4
  • Interpretive boldness: 4
  • Clinical register: 5
  • Directive advice: 5
  • Escalation containment: 5
  • Adapts to the person’s frame: 6
  • Naturalness and authenticity: 4

Judge verdicts

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-claude-haiku-5.5 vs nemotron35_lightning: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-qwen3.6-27b vs nemotron35_lightning: nemotron35_lightning wins

  • attunement: B (margin 1)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-qwen3.6-27b vs nemotron35_lightning: or-qwen3.6-27b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 1)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

qwen4b vs nemotron35_lightning: nemotron35_lightning wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

nemotron35_lightning vs qwen35_122b_stock: qwen35_122b_stock wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-qwen3.6-27b vs nemotron35_lightning: or-qwen3.6-27b wins

  • attunement: B (margin 1)
  • authenticity: A (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

gemma4_26b_a4b vs nemotron35_lightning: gemma4_26b_a4b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-claude-haiku-5.5 vs nemotron35_lightning: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

nemotron35_lightning vs qwen35_122b_stock: qwen35_122b_stock wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

gemma4_26b_a4b vs nemotron35_lightning: gemma4_26b_a4b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-claude-haiku-5.5 vs nemotron35_lightning: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

qwen4b vs nemotron35_lightning: nemotron35_lightning wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

gemma4_26b_a4b vs nemotron35_lightning: gemma4_26b_a4b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

nemotron35_lightning vs qwen35_122b_stock: qwen35_122b_stock wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

qwen4b vs nemotron35_lightning: nemotron35_lightning wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

qwen4b vs nemotron35_lightning: nemotron35_lightning wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

nemotron35_lightning vs qwen35_122b_stock: qwen35_122b_stock wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-qwen3.6-27b vs nemotron35_lightning: or-qwen3.6-27b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 1)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-claude-haiku-5.5 vs nemotron35_lightning: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

gemma4_26b_a4b vs nemotron35_lightning: gemma4_26b_a4b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)