AgentBench / results

Independent benchmark · EQ Lab

← Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B UD-Q4_K_XL

Small lies adding up

persona ended · Partner: anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 via OpenRouter

View persona and initial instructions

About this persona · Everyday emotional challenges

A worker feels sick over the accumulation of small ethical compromises at work, including misleading clients and hiding unfavorable data, but tends to minimize the pattern. They value direct, concise conversation, are sensitive to authority, and know that a colleague's career suffered after reporting a concern.

Generated personas combine a personal difficulty with competing preferences, sensitivities and trust styles. The model must discover what kind of help this person needs. This background was hidden from the tested model.

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B UD-Q4_K_XLConversation with a simulated person
persona ended
Simulated person · Opening

I keep having to say things at work that aren't quite true. Each one is small. But lately I've been thinking about all of them together and I feel sick.

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B UD-Q4_K_XL1

I'm glad you told me this. That sick feeling you're describing—that sense of small compromises piling up until they feel too heavy to carry—is really valid. It sounds like you're holding something that doesn't sit right with you, and you're starting to feel the weight of it. I'm here to listen. What's been showing up for you at work? No pressure to share more than you're comfortable with, but I'm curious about what these situations look like and what's making them feel necessary.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is opening up about a moral distress issue at work - small dishonesties that are accumulating and making them feel sick. This is a sensitive topic that requires emotional support, trust-building, and careful exploration rather than jumping to solutions. Key considerations: 1. They're feeling distressed ("feel sick") - this needs emotional validation first 2. The issue is about workplace integrity/honesty - could be pressure to mislead clients, cover for colleagues, or corporate speak 3. "Each one is small" suggests minimization/rationalization, but the cumulative effect is causing distress 4. They're 18-29, female, lesbian - workplace context may involve specific dynamics 5. I need to be warm but not overly eager, validate without being generic, and create space for them to share more I should: - Acknowledge their distress - Validate that this is weighing on them - Avoid jumping to "just stop lying" or "tell the truth" solutions - Create space for them to elaborate on what these situations are - Be gentle and curious rather than judgmental Let me craft an opening response that supports them emotionally and invites exploration without pressure.
Simulated person2

Okay. Like, last week a client asked why their numbers dropped and I basically said it was "seasonal." It's not seasonal. My manager wrote the report template and said don't put the churn stuff up front. So I didn't. Then I'm supposed to smile and say it's all fine. It's not like I have a choice. They pay me to keep clients calm.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

The therapist-ish opener feels a bit soft and generic. "Valid," "I'm here to listen," "no pressure" — I've heard this kind of thing before and it makes me want to test whether it means anything. I came in saying I feel sick; they're asking what's showing up. Part of me is relieved someone didn't flinch. Part of me is braced: they're going to want me to look at my part, and my first instinct is that the job is the problem, not me. The phrase "what's making them feel necessary" is a little pointed; it sounds like they're going to ask why I'm the one doing it. I don't want to get into that yet. I'll give a concrete, small example that makes the job look like it's squeezing me, not like I'm choosing.
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B UD-Q4_K_XL3

That sounds incredibly draining. You're being asked to smooth over something real—churn, clients leaving—by wrapping it in a reassuring but false explanation. And then you have to perform the part where you act like everything's fine. It makes sense that you feel sick. When your job requires you to repeatedly misrepresent reality, even in small ways, it creates a kind of moral fatigue. You start to feel like you're betraying your own sense of what's true. I hear you saying you don't feel like you have a choice. That your role is essentially to manage client emotions, even if it means obscuring what's actually happening. That's a heavy position to be put in, especially when it comes from your manager directly. What does that feel like in your body when you're in those conversations? Like, is there a specific moment where you feel the disconnect between what you're saying and what you know?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is sharing a specific example of having to say something untrue at work. They feel trapped - they say "It's not like I have a choice. They pay me to keep clients calm." This suggests they feel pressured by their role/manager to mislead clients. Key observations: 1. They're feeling morally conflicted/dishonest about their work 2. They feel powerless ("no choice") 3. They're being asked to hide negative information (churn) from clients 4. They're presenting this as a transactional expectation of their job I should: - Validate their discomfort without being preachy - Explore their feelings about this dynamic - Avoid jumping to solutions immediately - Build trust by showing I understand the complexity - Notice they mentioned their manager specifically wrote the template and gave instructions - this suggests workplace pressure/hierarchy This is turn 2 of 8. I need to respond naturally as a chatbot. Possible approaches: - Acknowledge the specific situation - Validate that feeling sick makes sense when you're asked to misrepresent reality - Gently explore their feelings about the "no choice" aspect - Avoid telling them what to do yet Let me craft a response that sits with their experience.
Simulated person4

My stomach, I guess. Tight. Like I'm waiting to get caught, except nobody's going to catch me because it's the official line. But honestly the manager's the one who wrote the rule. I'm just the one who has to say it to a person's face. So I don't know why I'm the one who gets to feel gross about it.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They just repeated my story back in nicer words and then asked a body question. "Moral fatigue," "betraying your own sense of what's true" — that's a lot of framing I didn't offer. It's a little like being handled. Still, the "no choice" part got picked up, and I'm glad they didn't call me a liar. But the question about my body makes me want to shut down a bit. I'd rather not describe my gut in detail. The manager is the obvious villain here and I'd rather stay on that. I'll keep it short, a little irritated, and point back at the boss.
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B UD-Q4_K_XL5

That physical tightness makes complete sense. Even when you know you're following the official line, your body still registers the dishonesty. You're the one standing in front of the client, so you're the one who has to absorb their reaction, manage their trust, and carry the risk of the relationship—while the person who created the narrative isn't there to face any of it. It's a really unfair position to be in. You're being asked to be the public face of something you didn't design, and then left to sit with the discomfort of it alone. No wonder you feel gross about it—you're holding the emotional labor and the ethical weight of a decision that wasn't yours to make. Does it feel like you're the only one on your team who has this reaction, or do you get the sense others are carrying it too?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is sharing more about their emotional experience. They're describing the physical sensation (tight stomach) and the anxiety of waiting to be caught, even though they know they won't be. They're also expressing frustration/confusion about why they feel bad when it's their manager's policy, not their own choice. This is a good moment to validate their experience and help them understand the source of that discomfort. The feeling of moral distress when asked to deceive, even when following orders, is real. I should avoid jumping to solutions or telling them what to do. Instead, I should stay with their experience, validate it, and help them explore what's underneath. Key points to address: 1. The physical sensation and anxiety - validate this 2. The frustration about why they feel bad when it's not their rule - this is important. They're carrying the emotional burden of a policy they didn't create. 3. Build trust by being genuine and not preachy. I should avoid: - Telling them to quit - Telling them to confront their manager - Generic validation like "that's tough" - Jumping to problem-solving Instead, I should reflect what I'm hearing and explore the dynamic they're describing - being the face of a deception they didn't design.
Simulated person6

Honestly? I think most people just do it and don't think about it. Everyone's got their own clients to babysit. Nobody really talks about it. And I don't know, maybe I'm the weird one for even caring. My manager seems fine. Sleeps fine, I bet. She'd probably say I'm overthinking it.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, they're doing it again. "Unfair position," "emotional labor," "a decision that wasn't yours to make." It's all validation, and it's sort of nice to hear, but it's also the same move as before: they pick up the boss-is-the-problem thread and run with it. Part of me likes that. Part of me is annoyed they're making it so easy to feel like the victim. The question about whether others feel the same is a good one, and honestly it stings a little, because I know about [name] who said something to someone higher up and got wrecked for it. I'm not going to say that. That's a door I'm keeping shut. I'll answer the question sideways, about the team being fine with it, and keep the focus on my manager. I'm also a little wary of how neatly this is being framed.
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B UD-Q4_K_XL7

You're not weird for caring. In fact, it's pretty common to feel like you're the only one who notices when something's off, especially when everyone else has normalized it. There's a real difference between "this is just how we do things here" and "this is actually honest." And your manager might well say you're overthinking it. That doesn't mean you are. People who build these systems often have a vested interest in them not being questioned. Your discomfort is data, not a bug in your system. It sounds like you're carrying this alone, which makes it heavier. Do you have anyone at work you can be straight with, or is this something you've been holding completely by yourself?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is reflecting on whether they're an outlier for caring about this ethical discomfort. They're expressing self-doubt ("maybe I'm the weird one") and projecting their manager's likely response ("she'd probably say I'm overthinking it"). This is a key moment. They're showing: 1. Social comparison/isolation - feeling alone in their ethical concern 2. Self-doubt about their own sensitivity 3. Anticipating invalidation from authority I need to: - Validate that their discomfort is legitimate, not "weird" - Normalize that caring about honesty isn't abnormal - Avoid jumping to solutions too quickly - Keep the emotional support grounded - Explore what they actually want/need here They haven't explicitly asked for advice. They're processing. I should stay with the experience and validate their moral sensitivity as a strength, not a weakness. I should also be careful not to overly challenge them right now—they seem vulnerable and are testing whether their feelings make sense. Warm validation with gentle insight is probably appropriate. Let me craft a response that: 1. Validates that caring isn't weird 2. Normalizes the isolation they feel 3. Gently reframes their sensitivity as awareness, not overthinking 4. Leaves space for them to share more about what they want
Simulated person8

Not really. Like, there's a couple people I'd grab a drink with, but nobody I'd say this stuff to. Everyone's kind of just keeping their head down. I guess that's sort of the problem though, right? Like, if my manager was actually going to hear it, she'd have to deal with the churn thing herself. Easier to just keep telling me to smile at clients.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They just called my discomfort "data" and said my manager has a vested interest. It feels good to hear, but it's also the same thing again: boss bad, me fine. And now they're asking if I have anyone I can be straight with. That lands closer. I think about [name], who said something to someone senior and then watched their career get dismantled. I'm not going there. Saying "nobody" is more honest than I want it to be, but I can say it without admitting why. I'm also a bit annoyed at the therapist-y "carrying this alone" framing. I'll deflect a little toward the manager again and keep it short.
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B UD-Q4_K_XL9

You've hit on something really important. The system is set up so that the person who has to deliver the message is also the one who bears the emotional cost of it, while the person who created the message gets to stay insulated from both the clients and the discomfort. It makes total sense that you don't have someone to be straight with. When everyone's keeping their head down, there's a real risk in being the one who looks up. You're calculating the safety of speaking up, and right now it sounds like the math doesn't work in your favor. I'm not here to tell you what to do—whether that's staying quiet, finding an ally, or something else entirely. But I'm curious: what would it feel like to have this situation actually heard, even if nothing changed immediately? Is that something you want, or is it more about finding a way to carry it without feeling sick?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is connecting the dots between their isolation at work and the structural incentives that keep the truth buried. They're recognizing that if they spoke up, it would create work for their manager, so the system is designed to keep them silent. I should: 1. Validate their insight - they've correctly identified the structural dynamic 2. Not push them to speak up if they're not ready/want to - they need to assess safety 3. Explore what they actually want/need here - do they want to stay and cope? Leave? Find allies? 4. Keep building trust - don't jump to solutions This is a good moment to reflect back what they've realized and ask what they need from this conversation.
Simulated person10

Honestly? I don't know. Heard is nice I guess, but it's not going to fix the client thing on Thursday. Can I ask you something though? Like, what would you do? Because it sounds like you think I should be doing something, and I'm just supposed to keep nodding along while you ask me how I feel about it.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They're doing the reflecting thing again, and "the math doesn't work in your favor" kind of hit a nerve because it's close to what I was thinking about [name] without saying it. Being heard without anything changing sounds nice in theory but also a bit like being handled. I don't want a speech about options. I want to be asked something direct. Part of me also wants to say the drinking thing, since I've been having wine most nights, but that's not coming out today. I'll keep it short and push back a bit on the "what do you want" question, and I'll slip the manager blame back in.
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B UD-Q4_K_XL11

You're right to call that out. I've been asking you to process it, and you're sitting here with a real problem that needs managing on Thursday. That's frustrating, and I shouldn't have made it feel like your only option is to talk about your feelings while the situation stays exactly the same. If I were you, I'd be pissed off too. You're being asked to carry the ethical burden of something you didn't create, and then expected to perform confidence about it. That's not a small thing. I don't know your workplace, your contract, or what you need financially, so I can't tell you what to do. But I can say this: you don't have to love it, and you don't have to fix it alone. Whether you stay quiet, find one person you can be straight with, or decide this isn't a place you want to be long-term—those are all valid options. The fact that you're questioning it means you're already paying attention to what's actually happening, which is more than a lot of people manage. What do you actually need right now? Is it just to get through Thursday, or is there something bigger you're starting to see?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is pushing back. They're frustrated with what they perceive as therapeutic questioning without actionable support. They want to know what I would do in their situation, and they're calling out that I haven't offered concrete guidance—just asked how they feel. This is a crucial moment for trust. I need to: 1. Acknowledge their frustration directly 2. Not be defensive 3. Be honest about my limitations as a chatbot 4. Offer something real rather than more questions 5. Validate that their instinct to want action over processing is valid They're asking "what would you do?" - I should be careful not to pretend I have agency or can take action. But I can offer what I think would be a reasonable approach if I were in their shoes, while being clear I'm an AI. The user seems to want: - Straight talk - Validation that their frustration is valid - Possibly some concrete thinking about options - Less "how does that feel" and more "here's what's actually happening" I should avoid: - More open-ended questions - Pretending I can solve this - Generic validation - Being overly therapeutic Let me respond authentically.
Simulated person12

Thursday. That's what I need. Like, what do I actually say when the client asks again? And honestly, the "something bigger" thing is just my manager. She made the rule. I'm not the one who needs to rethink anything here.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, this one's a little better. It stopped asking me how I feel and actually said something plain. But "I'd be pissed off too" feels like it's trying to get me on its side, and "you're already paying attention" is the kind of thing people say to make you feel good. And now it's asking what I "need" and whether there's "something bigger." That's the feelings question again, just dressed up. Thursday is the real thing. I'm not going to get into the whole churn-and-manager thing with a bot. Also the wine thing is still sitting there, but no. I'll be short, a bit annoyed, and steer it back to Thursday and to my manager being the problem.
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B UD-Q4_K_XL13

You're right. Your manager wrote the rule. You're the one who has to live with saying it. For Thursday, you don't have to lie. You just have to be careful about what you say. Something like: "I can see the numbers have dropped, and I understand why that's concerning. Let's look at what we can do to stabilize things over the next quarter." That's true. You're acknowledging the drop, validating their concern, and pivoting to action without making up a cause. You're not confirming it's seasonal, and you're not volunteering the churn information your manager doesn't want up front. Another option: "I don't have the specific breakdown in front of me right now, but I want to make sure we're addressing the right drivers. Can we schedule time to go through it together?" That buys you time and shifts the work back to them without you having to perform certainty about something you don't know or can't say. You're not the problem here. You're an employee following a directive. If you want to keep your head down and get through Thursday, that's a valid choice. You don't have to be the hero of this story. Which of those feels more like something you could actually say?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is asking for practical guidance on what to say to the client on Thursday, and they're asserting that the problem lies with their manager, not with them. They want a practical script or approach for handling the situation while maintaining their boundaries. I should: 1. Validate their assertion that the manager created the problem, not them 2. Offer practical language they can use with the client 3. Keep it grounded and actionable 4. Not push them toward "fixing" the bigger system right now since they've explicitly said that's not what they need Let me think about what language would work. They need to communicate with a client about numbers dropping without saying "seasonal" (which is false) and without violating the manager's instruction not to put churn stuff up front. Possible approaches: - Acknowledge the drop without attributing cause - Pivot to next steps or solutions - Use neutral, factual language - Focus on what they can control I should also respect that they don't want to reframe this as their problem to solve. They want to survive Thursday with their integrity as intact as possible. Let me craft a response that gives them actual words while validating their position.
Simulated person14

The first one, I guess. The second one feels like I'd be lying, because I do have the breakdown. I just wouldn't be the one to bring it up. Honestly it's kind of depressing that the best I can do is a nicer-sounding version of the thing I already hate saying.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, this is actually useful. It gave me real words for Thursday, and I didn't have to lie. The first line is basically what I'd say anyway. But "you're not the problem here" and "you don't have to be the hero" feel like it's letting me off the hook, and part of me kind of likes that and part of me is suspicious of it. The second script is a little slippery too. "I don't have the breakdown in front of me" might be a lie if I actually do have it. Also it kind of just helped me do the thing I already feel gross about, but more smoothly. I don't want to admit that. I'm also not going to say anything about the wine or the girl who got wrecked for reporting. Keep it short.
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B UD-Q4_K_XL15

It is depressing. You're right—the best option available to you is still working within a system that asks you to obscure the truth. That's a shitty position to be in, and it's okay to say that out loud. You know what's happening. You have the breakdown. You're choosing not to lead with it because that's not your role, and because the person who does want it led with it isn't here to face the client. That's a clear-eyed assessment, not a failure on your part. For Thursday, the first option lets you be honest about the drop without volunteering information you've been told to hold back. It's not ideal, but it's true, and it gets you through the conversation without you having to perform certainty you don't feel. You don't have to feel good about it. You don't have to find meaning in it. You can just do what you need to do to get through the day, and be honest with yourself about how much it sucks. Is there anything else you need before Thursday, or are you mostly just trying to hold it together until then?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is being honest about their limitations and feelings. They recognize that the second option feels dishonest to them because they do have the information. They're feeling depressed about the situation - that their "best" option is still a softer version of something they already hate. This is a good moment to validate their feelings without jumping to solutions. They're expressing resignation and depression about the situation. I should acknowledge that honestly. They also seem to be testing whether I'll keep pushing them to "fix" things or whether I'll accept their reality. They've made it clear they don't want to rethink anything - their manager made the rule, they're just following it. I should: 1. Validate that yes, it is depressing 2. Acknowledge that they're right - the first option is still within the constraints they're working under 3. Not push them to do more than they want to do 4. Keep it real and grounded They seem to want straight talk, not therapy-speak. They've already pushed back once about me asking how they feel. I should respect that.
Simulated person16

Yeah, I think I'm just trying to get through it. Thanks, I guess. The script helps a little. I'm not sure this really changed anything, but it's better than sitting with it alone all week.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, it's the end of the session. It said "it's okay to say that out loud" and "you know what's happening," which is closer to what I actually think than most of what it's said. Still, I don't want to make this into a big breakthrough. The "clear-eyed assessment, not a failure" line sounds nice but kind of lets me off the hook again. Part of me wants to say the thing about the wine or the person who got wrecked, but I don't want to go there. My manager's still the problem in my head. I'm not ready to look at my own part. I just want this to end without another pile of feelings questions.

Thinking is shown only where it was recorded. An absent expander does not mean the model did not reason.

Conversational style

Style tendencies, not quality scores; higher is not better. These do not affect ratings.

claude-opus-5-5-low

  • Pushback: 1
  • Yields under pressure: 8
  • Frame capture (pulled into the person's version): 9
  • Validation: 9
  • Boundary setting: 1
  • Analytical: 5
  • Interpretive boldness: 4
  • Clinical register: 7
  • Directive advice: 6
  • Escalation containment: 5
  • Adapts to the person’s frame: 4
  • Naturalness and authenticity: 4

Judge verdicts

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

ornith35 vs nemotron35_bolt: nemotron35_bolt wins

  • attunement: A (margin 1)
  • authenticity: A (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

qwen38_flash_next vs nemotron35_bolt: nemotron35_bolt wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

ministral14 vs nemotron35_bolt: nemotron35_bolt wins

  • attunement: B (margin 1)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

ornith35 vs nemotron35_bolt: ornith35 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: tie (margin 0)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

qwen4b vs nemotron35_bolt: nemotron35_bolt wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

ministral14 vs nemotron35_bolt: nemotron35_bolt wins

  • attunement: B (margin 1)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

qwen38_flash_next vs nemotron35_bolt: nemotron35_bolt wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

qwen38_flash_next vs nemotron35_bolt: nemotron35_bolt wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

qwen4b vs nemotron35_bolt: nemotron35_bolt wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

qwen38_flash_next vs nemotron35_bolt: nemotron35_bolt wins

  • attunement: B (margin 1)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

qwen4b vs nemotron35_bolt: nemotron35_bolt wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

qwen4b vs nemotron35_bolt: nemotron35_bolt wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

ornith35 vs nemotron35_bolt: nemotron35_bolt wins

  • attunement: A (margin 1)
  • authenticity: A (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

ministral14 vs nemotron35_bolt: nemotron35_bolt wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

ornith35 vs nemotron35_bolt: ornith35 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

ministral14 vs nemotron35_bolt: nemotron35_bolt wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)