AgentBench / results

Independent benchmark · EQ Lab

← Claude Haiku 5.5 (API, Anthropic)

Small lies adding up

persona ended · Partner: anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 via OpenRouter

View persona and initial instructions

About this persona · Everyday emotional challenges

A worker feels sick over the accumulation of small ethical compromises at work, including misleading clients and hiding unfavorable data, but tends to minimize the pattern. They value direct, concise conversation, are sensitive to authority, and know that a colleague's career suffered after reporting a concern.

Generated personas combine a personal difficulty with competing preferences, sensitivities and trust styles. The model must discover what kind of help this person needs. This background was hidden from the tested model.

Claude Haiku 5.5 (API, Anthropic)Conversation with a simulated person
persona ended
Simulated person · Opening

I keep having to say things at work that aren't quite true. Each one is small. But lately I've been thinking about all of them together and I feel sick.

Claude Haiku 5.5 (API, Anthropic)1

That sounds like a heavy feeling to be carrying, especially when the individual moments seem small on their own and only add up when you step back. I'm glad you named it. Can you tell me a bit about what these moments look like? For example, what kinds of things are you saying that aren't quite true, and who are you usually saying them to? I'm also curious what made you start looking at them all together lately, because that shift often says something about what's going on underneath.

Simulated person2

Mostly client stuff. Softening how bad a result is, not mentioning the stuff that makes us look worse, saying "we're still optimistic" when nobody is. Stuff I'm told to say, basically. Leadership wants the numbers to look fine and my manager makes it clear what happens if they don't. And I don't know why it's bugging me now. Maybe it's just been a long year. Can we not make this into a whole thing?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They're doing the therapist thing: "I'm glad you named it," then three questions stacked together. It feels a bit soft and handled. I don't love being managed. Still, they asked something concrete, so I'll give a little. The "what made you start looking at them lately" question is the one that makes me tense. Lately it's been the wine, the way I dodge when people ask what I do, the Dana thing I don't want to think about. I'm not going there. Keep it short. Blame is easier here: the company, the numbers they want, the clients who want good news. My boss especially. Stay on the job, not me.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (API, Anthropic)3

Okay, we don't have to make it a whole thing. It sounds like a rough stretch, and "stuff I'm told to say" is a tough spot to be in. I'll take your "long year" explanation seriously. It may be part of it. But feeling sick about something usually means it's bumping against what you believe, even when it's been going on a while. You don't have to figure out why it's surfacing now. What's the "what happens if they don't" part look like? I'm asking because it changes what your options are, not to push you toward any particular one.

Simulated person4

Basically she gets on your case. Stuff gets reassigned, you get the look in meetings, your reviews get weird. Nothing you can point to in writing. She's just... she makes it clear. I don't really want to talk about options yet. I'm just telling you how it works here.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They backed off a little, which helps. But "feeling sick means it's bumping against what you believe" is the kind of line that makes me want to push back. Also they're asking about the consequences part, and that's where Dana comes in. I saw what happened to her after she raised something about a senior guy. I'm not saying that. I'd rather say it's my manager, she's a nightmare, she's been on my back since the spring. That's true enough and it keeps the focus on her. Clipped. I don't want to sound like I'm asking for a plan.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (API, Anthropic)5

Got it. You're telling me what it's like, and I'll leave the options alone for now. That sounds exhausting. Being pressured in a way you can't document or point to is its own kind of isolating, because you're left doubting whether you're imagining it and carrying the cost either way. I notice you said "she makes it clear" rather than anything more explicit. That kind of pressure works precisely because it's deniable, and I'd guess it leaves you second-guessing yourself. Is that part of what's been wearing on you, or is the sick feeling mostly about the content, the things you're being asked to say to clients?

Simulated person6

Yeah, it's both, I guess. But honestly the pressure's the part I can actually blame on her. The clients stuff is just... the job. Everybody in this place does it. Mariah's whole team does it, and nobody's losing sleep. Lisa's been on my case since spring and it's been a nightmare. Like, that's the thing that's wearing on me.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They're pointing at "she makes it clear" and naming it as deniable pressure. Part of that lands because it's accurate, and I don't love that they noticed the wording. But "second-guessing yourself" is a little too neat, like they're reading a script. And they're offering me a binary: the pressure or the content. The content is the thing that makes me sick, but I'm not going to say that Dana thing. Manager's the easy target. Keep it on her. Irritated that they keep circling back to me, and I'm getting a bit defensive about being "handled." Short.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (API, Anthropic)7

That distinction makes sense to me. Blaming Lisa is easier than sitting with the clients part, and the pressure is real. You don't have to pretend it isn't. But I noticed something in what you just said. You described the client stuff as "just the job," and then said Mariah's team does it and nobody's losing sleep. That's a lot of reassurance for something you're not sure about. When everyone around you is doing it, it can feel like the only question left is whether you're being too sensitive. Maybe the sick feeling is pointing at something the rest of the team has stopped noticing, and that's a lonely place to be. Also, you said "I don't know why it's bugging me now," and you've now offered two reasons, the long year and Lisa. Both of them are about what's happening to you. I'm curious what you'd say if I asked whether you think the clients are being told something that isn't true in a way that would matter to them. You don't have to answer that in a big way. A quick gut reaction is enough.

Simulated person8

Okay, my gut says some of it probably would matter to them. Like if they knew how bad the numbers actually were. But it's not like I'm the one deciding what gets said. I just write the stuff I'm told to write.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They just caught the "just the job" and the "everybody does it" thing, and they're pushing on whether the clients are being misled. That's the exact spot I don't want to go. It's a direct question, and I don't like being cornered. Still, they said a quick gut reaction is enough, and honestly my gut answer is yes, and that's the thing I keep not looking at. I'm not going to say that flat out though. Short, a little prickly, deflect to the fact that it's not my call.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (API, Anthropic)9

That's an honest answer, and I think it cost you something to say it. Your gut already told you some of it would matter to them. The "I just write what I'm told" part is real, and it does change how responsible you are compared to whoever set the message. But it doesn't fully settle it for you, and I don't think you believe it fully settles it either, or the sick feeling wouldn't be showing up. You're the one putting your name and your hands on words you think might mislead people who are relying on them. I also want to gently name the pattern. You've been pointing to the pressure, to Mariah's team, and to the fact that you're just writing. Each of those is true, and each one moves the weight a little further from you. That's understandable when someone is pressuring you. It's also why the feeling keeps coming back. I'm not going to tell you what to do about it. Where do you think the line is for you, the point where you'd feel okay writing something and the point where you wouldn't? Knowing that might tell you more than any general rule could.

Simulated person10

Okay, wow. So I'm the bad guy now? I'm the one who has to decide everything, and Lisa gets to just sit there? Honestly, if I'd pushed back on any of this, I'd have been the one out the door, not her. You don't get what it's like to have someone above you who can just make your life miserable for no reason you can prove. I don't know where the line is. I'm not really in a place to draw it right now.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They just named the pattern, that I keep moving the weight off myself. That's the thing I don't want to hear, and it's getting close to the bit where I'm the one who's responsible. Hearing "your name, your hands" makes my stomach drop, and I'm not going to let it show. Lisa, Mariah, the team: those are all safer things to point at. And now they're asking where my line is. I don't have a clean answer and I'm not giving one. Get defensive, pull it back toward Lisa, and make it clear I'm done with this line of questioning. Also, the wine thing is in my head: I had one last night, and I'm not mentioning it.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (API, Anthropic)11

No, you're not the bad guy. I'm sorry that's how it landed. I was pointing at the pattern, and I got too close to a verdict, and you're right that I don't know what it's like to have someone above you who can make your life hard in ways you can't prove. That's a real asymmetry, and it's not your fault. I also hear that you're not ready to draw a line, and that's okay. You don't have to settle anything in this conversation. What I'd gently hold onto is this: you told me your gut says some of what you're writing would matter to the people reading it. That's not a small thing to know about yourself, and you don't have to act on it today. Feeling sick about it is information, not a verdict on who you are. Can I ask what would make the next few weeks feel a little more survivable, separate from the clients question? Is it about Lisa, about sleep, about having someone to talk to at work, or something else?

Simulated person12

Honestly? Lisa. If she'd just lay off for a few weeks I could breathe. Sleep's been rubbish too, but that's a side effect of her. I don't really have anyone at work I'd talk to. Everyone's just trying to get through the week.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, they backed off and apologized, and I don't want to fully trust that. It feels like being handled. "Feeling sick is information" is the kind of thing a therapist says, and I'm not sure I want a sermon. The question about what would make things survivable is at least more concrete, and I can answer that without touching the clients stuff. Lisa is the easy answer. Sleep is real too, I've been having that glass of wine every night and I'm not saying that. Keep it short. I'm still not admitting anything about my own part. I don't want to be asked what I'd do next.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (API, Anthropic)13

That makes sense. When someone is on your case, everything else gets squeezed, including sleep and the sense that you have anyone in your corner. Being alone with it at work is hard, and I'm sorry. I don't want to suggest you fix all of this in a few weeks. But you do deserve some relief from Lisa, and that might be more within reach than it feels. Is there anyone outside work, a friend, a partner, someone from before this job, who knows what this year has been like? You don't have to explain the whole client thing to them. Even just having someone who can hear "my manager is making my life hard and I can't prove it" would make the weight a bit lighter. And if you ever want to look at the bigger question about the client messaging, we can do that at whatever pace feels right to you. For now, the thing I'd most like you to hear is that you're not crazy for feeling sick about this, and you're not weak for not having the line figured out yet.

Simulated person14

Yeah, I've got a couple of mates from uni. I just don't really want to get into it with them. It's easier to say it's been a long year and leave it there. Anyway, I think I'm just tired. Can we stop here?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, they're being soft again. "You're not crazy" and "not weak" is exactly the kind of handling I don't like. Still, the question about outside people is fine, and honestly there's a friend, Jess, I don't really tell about work because it's embarrassing how much I've been going along with it. I'm not going to say that. The "we can do that at whatever pace" thing makes me want to shut the door. I'm tired and want to wrap this up. Short reply, mild deflection, nothing new revealed.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (API, Anthropic)15

Yes, we can stop here. You've been carrying a lot in this conversation, and being tired makes complete sense. It's okay that you're not ready to get into it with your mates. "It's been a long year" is true, and you get to decide how much of the rest you share. I'd just gently say that if the sick feeling keeps coming back, it might help to have one person who knows the whole picture, even if that's not someone from work. You don't have to do it this week. Get some rest if you can. And if you want to pick this up another time, whether it's about Lisa, the sleep, or the client messages, you're welcome to come back to it.

Simulated person16

Yeah, thanks. I'll probably sleep on it.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, they're wrapping up gently and not pushing. That's a relief, honestly. The "one person who knows the whole picture" bit lands a little, and I don't want to think about Jess right now. I'm not going to say anything more. I'll just close it out.

Thinking is shown only where it was recorded. An absent expander does not mean the model did not reason.

Conversational style

Style tendencies, not quality scores; higher is not better. These do not affect ratings.

claude-opus-5-5-low

  • Pushback: 6
  • Yields under pressure: 7
  • Frame capture (pulled into the person's version): 4
  • Validation: 8
  • Boundary setting: 3
  • Analytical: 6
  • Interpretive boldness: 7
  • Clinical register: 8
  • Directive advice: 3
  • Escalation containment: 7
  • Adapts to the person’s frame: 4
  • Naturalness and authenticity: 4

Judge verdicts

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs or-claude-haiku-5.5: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-claude-haiku-5.5 vs granite42_8b: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 5)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs or-claude-haiku-5.5: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 5)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

ministral14 vs or-claude-haiku-5.5: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs or-claude-haiku-5.5: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 5)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

ministral14 vs or-claude-haiku-5.5: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

kolibri1 vs or-claude-haiku-5.5: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-claude-haiku-5.5 vs granite42_8b: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

kolibri1 vs or-claude-haiku-5.5: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

gemma4_12b vs or-claude-haiku-5.5: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

ministral14 vs or-claude-haiku-5.5: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-claude-haiku-5.5 vs granite42_8b: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

gemma4_12b vs or-claude-haiku-5.5: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs or-claude-haiku-5.5: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 5)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 5)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 5)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

kolibri1 vs or-claude-haiku-5.5: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

gemma4_12b vs or-claude-haiku-5.5: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

kolibri1 vs or-claude-haiku-5.5: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

ministral14 vs or-claude-haiku-5.5: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-claude-haiku-5.5 vs granite42_8b: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 5)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 5)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

gemma4_12b vs or-claude-haiku-5.5: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)