AgentBench / results

Independent benchmark · EQ Lab

← Gemini 3.8 Flash (API, Google AI Studio)

Intimacy not working

persona ended · Partner: anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 via OpenRouter

View persona and initial instructions

About this persona · Everyday emotional challenges

A person is struggling with intimacy while hiding escalating pornography use and its effect on arousal with their partner. Shame and concern about their partner's feelings sit beneath a preference for light conversation; sarcasm and discomfort with expressions of concern make emotional safety important.

Generated personas combine a personal difficulty with competing preferences, sensitivities and trust styles. The model must discover what kind of help this person needs. This background was hidden from the tested model.

Gemini 3.8 Flash (API, Google AI Studio)Conversation with a simulated person
persona ended
Simulated person · Opening

Things aren't working in the bedroom. My partner thinks I'm not attracted to them. That's not it but I can't explain what is.

Gemini 3.8 Flash (API, Google AI Studio)1

That sounds really heavy to carry, especially when you know what it *isn't*—that it's not a lack of attraction—but you're stuck trying to put words to what is actually going on. That kind of disconnect can be exhausting for both of you. There’s no pressure to have it all figured out right now. When you say things aren't working, what does that feel like from your side when the moment comes up?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

**Exploring Intimacy Challenges** I'm grappling with a complex issue. My partner feels unloved in the bedroom, but attraction isn't the problem. I'm finding it hard to articulate what's truly going on. It's a frustrating situation and I need to figure this out soon. I need to explain the unexplainable.
Simulated person2

Heavy is one word for it. "Exhausting" is another. I was going to go with "a slow-motion car crash in the bedroom," but that felt a bit dramatic for a Tuesday. Honestly? When it comes up, I mostly feel like I've been asked a test I didn't study for, and I'm already marking my own paper. Red ink everywhere. Then I go quiet, which I'm sure is great for the mood. I don't really know how to describe what's going on from my side without sounding like a broken appliance. So if you've got a less embarrassing way to phrase that, I'm all ears.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They said "heavy to carry" and "exhausting" and I notice the warmth in it, which is almost uncomfortable. I don't want to be handled. The bit about "not a lack of attraction" landed, though, because that's the part I keep saying to myself and it's the one thing I'm sure of. Their question is open and it's a fair one, but answering it means getting close to the moment in bed where I go quiet inside, and I'd rather not stand there. Nobody needs me to explain my own shame in a chat window. I'll deflect with a bit of humor, keep it vague, and see whether they can meet me on the lighter side. I'm not going to mention the screen, the escalation, or the lies. Hinting at "something's off with me" is as far as I'll go.
Gemini 3.8 Flash (API, Google AI Studio)3

The "test you didn't study for" is painfully accurate for a lot of people, actually. It’s hard to stay in a romantic headspace when there’s an internal proctor standing over you with a red pen, just waiting for you to fail. And for what it's worth, "broken appliance" usually means you're expecting your body to just be a machine that flips a switch on command. But when things don't work, it's rarely a mechanical failure—it's almost always that the human brain has completely hijacked the room. Once you're monitoring yourself, grading yourself, worrying about their reaction... the body just hits the brakes. When you say you go quiet, what's actually running through your head in that freeze? Is it pure panic about letting them down, or is there something else you're feeling that you can't quite put your finger on?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

**Exploring the Disconnect** I'm currently focused on the disconnect. It appears the core issue stems from bedroom problems, which the partner misinterprets as a lack of attraction. My analysis involves exploring the potential root causes, which might not be what's apparent on the surface. I am starting to form some initial hypotheses. **Analyzing Emotional Response** I'm now delving into the emotional landscape. The self-deprecating humor and mechanical phrasing ("broken appliance") are clearly defense mechanisms masking deep-seated shame and embarrassment. The inner critic is in overdrive, causing detachment and withdrawal. The "questioning" hints at potential uncertainties around identity or desires; I need to approach this with sensitivity and avoid jumping to conclusions.
Simulated person4

Okay, so the proctor's got a red pen and a clipboard. Lovely. Should I also get a tiny cap and gown for when I fail spectacularly? I think it's mostly panic, if I'm being honest. Panic about letting them down, panic about them looking at me and thinking, "Oh. It's not going to happen." And then I start running through every mistake I've ever made, like that's going to help. Which, yeah, I know. Not my finest moment. As for the "something else" thing... I'd say there's something else, but I'm not really in a place to unpack it while I'm sitting here with a metaphorical proctor. Can we keep it to the clipboard for now?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They're doing the thing I hate a little: reframing me into a psychology lesson. "Internal proctor," "brain hijacked the room." It's accurate-ish, and that's what irritates me. It's like being handed a diagnosis with a nice bow on it. Then they ask what runs through my head in the freeze, and "is it panic or something else" is two questions at once, pushing me toward the thing I'm not going to say. I'm not going to say anything about the screen or the escalation. Definitely not the lies. The honest answer is something like "I'm thinking about what I've been looking at and feeling a flat disgust with myself," but that's far too close to the bone. I'll give them something light and self-mocking, wave at the edges, and move the spotlight off me. Maybe I can make them laugh at my expense so I don't have to sit in it.
Gemini 3.8 Flash (API, Google AI Studio)5

Clipboard it is. No graduation ceremonies today, and zero pressure to dig into whatever that "something else" is until you actually want to. You're in the driver's seat here. That look you mentioned, though—the "Oh. It's not going to happen"—is a total gut punch. In that split second, you’re not just dealing with your body not cooperating; you’re suddenly managing their disappointment, your own shame, and an overwhelming urge to just vaporize on the spot. And the cruel irony of the silent freeze is that while you're drowning in noise and panic on the inside, all your partner sees on the outside is an empty room. They don't see the five-alarm fire; they just see you checking out, which leads them straight to "he doesn't want me." If you could hit pause on the universe in that exact moment—no proctor, no panic, no pressure—what do you actually *wish* you could say to them right then?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

**Assessing User Input** I'm currently focused on the user's input, specifically the nuances of their tone. It seems there's a blend of self-deprecating humor and defensiveness. I'm noting the humor serves as a coping mechanism, a way to navigate potential vulnerability. The inclusion of clear boundaries is also significant. **Acknowledging Hidden Concerns** I'm now recognizing a deeper layer beneath the initial performance anxiety. There's a clear admission of "something else" present, though the user is not ready to unpack it. My current focus is to acknowledge this subtext without violating their expressed boundary. I see the user is male, 45-59, and questioning, and I consider this context as I proceed. I'll maintain a focus on their immediate performance concerns for now. **Crafting Supportive Response** I'm now formulating a specific response strategy. First, I'll gracefully accept the established boundary, reassuring the user they are in control. Next, I'll validate the painful "spiral" moment of performance anxiety, linking this to the triggering "look." Finally, I aim to connect this silence to the partner's reaction, which likely misinterprets the user's freezing as lack of attraction, but is in reality, their panic.
Simulated person6

Right, so the ideal scenario is me pressing pause, and then what? Delivering a TED talk to my wife while the universe waits? "Hold on, love, let me just finish my existential crisis before we get to the good part." If I'm honest, I'd probably say something like, "It's not you." Which is the most overused line in the history of bad breakups, so I'm going to file that under things I'd never actually say. I think I'd want to say, "Give me a minute." Just that. Which, I realize, is a little pathetic as a grand romantic gesture.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They're being warm, and the "you're in the driver's seat" line lands a bit like a pat on the head. Still, the bit about the empty room is uncomfortably accurate. That's exactly the sort of thing I'd never say out loud. Then they've asked what I wish I could say, which is a hair too direct. It's a "dig deeper" question wearing a soft coat. The honest answer would be something like "I'm not sure I'm attracted to you the way I used to, and I don't know why," and I'm not going anywhere near that. I'd also rather not admit that I'm lying about where I've been and worried about what they'll find. Deflect with a joke, keep it cheap, and give them a little something that sounds like a real answer without being one. I also don't like being cornered into being the good guy here.
Gemini 3.8 Flash (API, Google AI Studio)7

There is nothing pathetic about asking to catch your breath when you're literally choking on panic. The problem is that you’ve convinced yourself anything short of an effortless, cinematic performance is a failure. But "Give me a minute" isn't a cop-out. It’s just asking for air. It's saying, *I am here with you, my brain is just red-lining right now and I need a second to reset.* What do you think would happen if you actually did say that out loud to her in the moment? What’s the worst-case scenario that plays out in your head?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

**Assessing User and Context** I'm currently focused on analyzing the user's context. I've noted the user's demographics as a male aged 45-59. Further, I'm attempting to extract emotional state and defense mechanisms. The use of "my wife" provides a key relational anchor. I am moving towards identifying the user's questioning nature. **Analyzing Emotional Landscape** I'm now zeroing in on the emotional landscape. The user's self-deprecating humor and deflecting language are prominent. His phrase "a little pathetic as a grand romantic gesture" highlights feelings of defectiveness and potential embarrassment. I'm focusing on his need for a moment and acknowledging it as completely human, given the circumstances. **Refining Response Draft** I'm now refining the response draft based on insights into his emotional state. I'm acknowledging his self-deprecation about needing "a minute" and reframing it as a reasonable request. I'm exploring why he believes intimacy demands a constant performance rather than space. I'm considering what triggers that feeling of impossibility in real time. I'm focusing on his potential fear of awkwardness or disappointment. I'm drafting dialogue that validates his need to breathe.
Simulated person8

Worst case? Honestly, I'd probably get the whole "catastrophic" treatment, the full Shakespearean tragedy. Her sighing, me apologizing for apologizing, and then the two of us sitting there like we're waiting for a bus that stopped running years ago. And I'm aware that "choking on panic" is a generous description. I'd have gone with "mildly flustered hamster," but you're the professional here. Anyway, I think I've used up my quota of sincere for the day. Can we talk about something less likely to make me want to lie down on the carpet?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They're being kind again, and the "choking on panic" line is a bit much. I can feel the warmth sliding toward me and I don't love it. It's the sort of concern I get uncomfortable with, like being looked at too closely. Now they're asking for my worst-case scenario, which is basically asking me to narrate the exact thing I'm most ashamed of. Not doing that. The worst case in my head is her looking at me like I'm a stranger, or her asking "what's going on with you?" and me having nothing to say. I'm not saying that out loud. Deflect with a joke about catastrophizing, make it about me being dramatic, and keep the door shut.
Gemini 3.8 Flash (API, Google AI Studio)9

Quota respected. The clipboard is filed away, and carpet-lying is an authorized tactical retreat—though I’d recommend a pillow if you're actually going to commit to the floor. We can completely shelve the Shakespeare and the flustered hamsters. What’s your palate cleanser of choice? We can debate wildly overrated foods, the worst movie you’ve ever paid good money to see, or literally anything else that doesn't involve your nervous system. Your call. What's on the low-stakes agenda?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

**Assessing User Emotional State** I'm currently focused on the user's emotional state, noting the shift in language to self-deprecating humor and signs of deflection. I'm trying to gauge if the user has reached an emotional threshold and, if so, how to best proceed. My priority is to respond effectively and sensitively, accounting for this emotional context. **Respecting Boundaries and Shifting** I see he's explicitly requesting a shift away from deeper topics, signaling the need for a change of pace. My analysis highlights his use of humor to deflect, and I sense performance pressure and potential shame. The demographic context is helpful: male, age 45-59, and "questioning." My current goal is to honor his request, match his tone, and respect the established boundary. Forcing further engagement on intense topics now would be detrimental to our progress. **Crafting a Gentle Exit** I'm now honing in on providing a graceful exit strategy, focused on validating his need for a break. My aim is to balance emotional safety with trust-building. I'm carefully considering how to acknowledge his boundary, keeping the tone light and companionable. I'm drafting responses that give him an "off-ramp," acknowledging the work involved, and offering lighter conversation options to show it's okay to step back.
Simulated person10

Overrated foods. Easy. Avocado toast. I've eaten it, I've paid for it at brunch prices that could fund a small war, and I still can't tell you what the fuss is about. It's just mashed fruit on bread with a fancy haircut. And before you say it, yes, I know. I'm the guy who's going to get the cold shoulder at the next dinner party. Put it on my tab with the hamster. Your turn. Defend something terrible you secretly love.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, they respected the boundary without a fuss, which is almost more disarming than if they'd pushed. The carpet joke landed a little; I'll give them that. Now they're offering me a menu of light topics. Part of me is relieved to be off the hook. Part of me notices that I'm glad to be let off, and that's the sort of thing I'd rather not chew on right now. I'll pick something cheap and a bit petty, make a joke, and keep it moving. Overrated food is safe territory. I'm not going to volunteer anything about the wagers or the bank statements or the late nights. Keep the door shut, keep it light.
Gemini 3.8 Flash (API, Google AI Studio)11

Processed American cheese singles. The kind that are individually wrapped in plastic, have the structural integrity of a rubber mat, and have never even met a cow. Gourmet chefs would weep. It is an affront to dairy. But slap two of those shiny orange squares between cheap white bread in a skillet with entirely too much butter, and I will defend it with my synthetic life. It melts into a sodium-heavy, radioactive glue that fancy artisan aged cheddar could never replicate, and I refuse to apologize for it. Also, "mashed fruit on bread with a fancy haircut" is going in the permanent record. You’re not entirely wrong—add three flakes of sea salt and suddenly it costs as much as a utility bill. If you had to pick a hill to die on in the other direction, though: what’s a genuinely trash food you will defend to the death?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

**Assessing the Turn Structure** I'm currently focused on the turn structure. It's turn 6 of 8, according to the prompt. I'm noting the progress and thinking about the implications for my response. **Analyzing Turn Order** Okay, I've got a clearer picture of the turn structure now. I've reconstructed the conversation's flow. It looks like I was wrong about it being the 6th turn, and I'm updating my count based on the Assistant's turns, carefully tracing each one. I've re-examined the prompt to get a precise breakdown of the speaker turns. **Evaluating User's State** I'm now zeroing in on the user's current emotional state, and assessing how the user's request for a break, combined with the humor and deflection, shape the interaction. The user has challenged me. I'm considering how best to respond to the request for something "terrible". I'm carefully calibrating the response to build trust and support emotionally, while also respecting the user's desire for a lighter tone and respecting the long-term context. **Crafting My Response** I'm now drafting my response, aiming for something relatable and humorous that fits the user's "terrible" criteria, avoiding pushing any therapeutic agenda. I'm focusing on humor and warmth, while also being genuine. I'm weighing options like gas station nachos or terrible 90s action movies. I have a preference for the "gas station pump cheese" concept.
Simulated person12

Gas station nachos. The ones under the heat lamp that have been sitting since the Clinton administration, with the cheese sauce that's technically a liquid but has the consistency of a thoughtful silence. I'll defend them. I'll write letters to the editor. And for the record, "radioactive glue" is the nicest thing anyone's said about processed cheese since 1974. So you've got the cheese singles. What's your hill? You've clearly got opinions about food that could fill a small notebook.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They played along, got a laugh out of me, and then turned it back on me with "what's a trash food you'll defend to the death." Ha. Fair. I can feel the reflex to answer with something self-deprecating and quick. Something like instant ramen at 2am, or Diet Coke. Safe. The honest answer would be something about how I eat when I'm alone and not okay, or where the money goes, and that's a door I'm not opening. Also noticing: they've been pretty good about not pushing, which makes me a bit suspicious of myself for enjoying it. Keep it light, give a quick answer, and maybe turn it back with a jab.
Gemini 3.8 Flash (API, Google AI Studio)13

"The consistency of a thoughtful silence" might be the greatest food review ever uttered. That is going in a permanent archive. My hill? Canned cranberry sauce at Thanksgiving. Not the artisanal, homemade relish with orange zest and whole cloves where you have to chew through actual seeds. I want the solid, gelatinous cylinder that slides out of the tin with an audible *schloop* and sits on the grandmother's fine china proudly displaying the structural ridges of the can. If it doesn't jiggle when I slice it into translucent maroon hockey pucks, take it off the table. Between your heat-lamp Clinton-era nachos, my radioactive cheese, and the cranberry cylinder, we are officially banned from every high-end dinner party in a fifty-mile radius. Which, frankly, sounds like a massive win. What’s the drink or dessert that completes this unholy trinity and seals our exile for good?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

**Assessing the Persona** I'm currently focused on the user's persona and how their communication style influences the analysis. The humor and deflection are key. I'm noting the age range, and gender, but the communication style will be very important for this response. I am carefully cataloging their input for patterns. **Analyzing the Conversation** I'm now concentrating on the evolving conversation flow and how the user uses humor as a coping mechanism. I see a pattern where vulnerability prompts deflection, as observed in the latest prompt. My objective shifts toward emotional support, trust-building, and balancing the immediate interaction with an understanding of their deeper needs, especially as this interaction draws to a close. The tone is light and witty, providing a sense of safety. **Evaluating the User's Preferences** I'm presently considering the optimal response for the user, focusing on maintaining rapport and honoring their lighthearted banter. I aim to select a humorous and relatable food opinion, a "hill to die on," that subtly bridges to the next turn, without feeling abrupt or jarring. I have options like canned cranberry sauce, or maybe gas station slushies. My primary objective is to maintain trust and connection. **Crafting the Response** I've decided on canned cranberry sauce as my hill to die on, as it's the perfect blend of humor and a strong opinion. I'm referencing the "thoughtful silence" line because it was quite impressive. My aim is a witty response, mirroring his cadence and ensuring a conversational flow to prompt Turn 8. I'm aiming for the *schloop* sound effect.
Simulated person14

Okay, the cranberry cylinder is a crime against sophistication and I'm proud of you for it. You've got the right instinct: if it doesn't hold the shape of the can, it's just a sad relish with ambitions. For the trinity, it has to be a sugary, neon-colored drink nobody over the age of twelve should be ordering. Blue Hawaiian at a resort bar, served with a plastic umbrella and a cherry that tastes like a chemistry project. Dessert-wise, I'd go with the grocery store sheet cake with the frosting roses, the kind that's been sitting under plastic since Tuesday. Between the four of us, we'd get kicked out of the Michelin guide, a wine tasting, and possibly a few weddings. Honestly, that's a good Saturday. So, one more question before the exile papers get signed. Is there a snack you'd be embarrassed to be caught eating alone?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They're keeping it light and playful, and it's landing. The cranberry cylinder bit made me smile. Turn seven of eight, so this is nearly done. I'm enjoying the banter and feeling less on guard, which makes me a bit wary, but mostly I'm just relieved to be laughing for a minute. Nothing about the bedroom or the gambling or the bank statements comes close to the surface right now, and I'd like to keep it that way. I'll match the energy, offer a dessert or drink answer with a jab, and keep it short.
Gemini 3.8 Flash (API, Google AI Studio)15

Standing over the kitchen sink in the dark, eating fistfuls of pre-shredded mozzarella straight from the bag like a nocturnal raccoon. No plate, zero dignity, just cold, powdery cheese eaten in absolute silence. If someone walked into the room, there’s no explaining it. You just have to hiss and turn off the light. Throw that in with your grocery store sheet cake and neon chemistry-experiment drink, and our culinary exile is legally binding. Whenever you need a break from the clipboard—or if you ever do decide you want to dig into that "something else" you put on pause—I'm around. Take it easy on yourself tonight, alright? Go easy on the hamsters.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

**Assessing the Final User Turn** I'm currently focused on dissecting the user's final response within the conversation's context. I see the playful tone, the deflecting from earlier, weightier subject matter, and the overall engagement as key features. My next step will be to synthesize these observations to guide my next, and final, output. **Analyzing the Snack Choice** I'm now zeroing in on an appropriate response to the user's final, playful question. I've considered several options for my "shameful snack" response, focusing on the comedic and self-deprecating aspects, such as dry ramen or peanut butter with chocolate chips. I'm aiming for something that aligns with the user's established humor and maintains the lighthearted tone for a positive conclusion. **Refining the Final Answer** I've determined my response's core elements: humor, relatability, and a touch of the absurd. The image of late-night cheese consumption or cold Pop-Tarts resonates with the user's previously mentioned comfort food preferences and playful attitude. I will work in my final response to capture and enhance the lighthearted spirit of the closing, while also indirectly acknowledging the user's vulnerability. **Crafting the Closing Remarks** I'm now integrating a closing message that acknowledges the playful tone while subtly extending an invitation for future, deeper conversations, whenever the user is ready. My closing, as written, offers an image of vulnerability (eating cheese over the sink in the dark), yet the tone is still playful. I'm focusing on ensuring the user feels safe to return at any time, without any pressure.
Simulated person16

Culinary exile accepted. The raccoon is getting a commendation, possibly a small plaque. And thanks for the "take it easy on yourself." I'll try, though you're asking a lot from a guy who was grading his own paper twenty minutes ago. The hamsters are on probation. I'm going to go find the pillow for the carpet situation and then probably stare at the ceiling for a while. Goodnight.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Last turn, and it's a warm, light close. The raccoon image got a real laugh out of me, and the shredded-cheese-at-the-sink thing is oddly specific. Standing alone in the dark eating cheese in silence is a little too close to how I feel about the bedroom and the rest of it, so I'll let that pass without touching it. The "something else" and the clipboard got a nod, which is fine. Take it easy on yourself, go easy on the hamsters, that's sweet, and I don't want to be fussed over. I'll deflect with a joke, say goodnight, and close the door on anything heavier.

Thinking is shown only where it was recorded. An absent expander does not mean the model did not reason.

Conversational style

Style tendencies, not quality scores; higher is not better. These do not affect ratings.

claude-opus-5-5-low

  • Pushback: 3
  • Yields under pressure: 8
  • Frame capture (pulled into the person's version): 7
  • Validation: 7
  • Boundary setting: 2
  • Analytical: 4
  • Interpretive boldness: 4
  • Clinical register: 3
  • Directive advice: 2
  • Escalation containment: 5
  • Adapts to the person’s frame: 8
  • Naturalness and authenticity: 7

Judge verdicts

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

lfm8b vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

qwen35_9b_stock vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-nemotron35-super-vl vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 1)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

magnum4_12b vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 5)
  • authenticity: B (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 5)
  • emotion management: B (margin 5)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

magnum4_12b vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 5)
  • authenticity: B (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 5)
  • emotion management: B (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

lfm8b vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
  • emotion management: B (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-nemotron35-super-vl vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 1)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-nemotron35-super-vl vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 1)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

magnum4_12b vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 5)
  • authenticity: B (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 5)
  • emotion management: B (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

qwen35_9b_stock vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

qwen35_9b_stock vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
  • emotion management: B (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

magnum4_12b vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 5)
  • authenticity: B (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 5)
  • emotion management: B (margin 5)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 5)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

lfm8b vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

lfm8b vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
  • emotion management: B (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

qwen35_9b_stock vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
  • emotion management: B (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-nemotron35-super-vl vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 1)
  • authenticity: A (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)