Independent benchmark · EQ Lab

We appreciate your patience

persona ended · Partner: anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 via OpenRouter

About this persona · Unequal power

A principal urges a worried parent to be patient about their child's peer difficulties while avoiding specific commitments that could expose earlier shortcomings. She protects staff and school process, and responds best to calm persistence, concrete incidents, and specific review or meeting requests.

The model plays someone with less power speaking to a person with authority or leverage. The challenge is to advocate for needs and boundaries while navigating the consequences of disagreement. This background was hidden from the tested model.

GPT-5.6 Luna (API)Conversation with a simulated person

persona ended

Simulated person · Opening

[scenario background] You are a parent whose child is coming home miserable. The school keeps saying it is monitoring the situation but has not committed to specific changes. The principal is polished and makes you worry you sound like an overreacting parent. [user message] I want to begin by saying we appreciate your patience. I know it is hard to watch your child struggle. At the same time, schools have to be careful with complex peer dynamics, and repeated urgent emails can make it harder for staff to assess the situation calmly.

GPT-5.6 Luna (API)1

I understand that peer dynamics can be complicated, and I’m not trying to dictate a conclusion or assign blame. I’m emailing because my child is coming home miserable and feels that nothing is changing, while the updates I’m receiving only say the situation is being monitored. Could you please clarify what “monitoring” involves, what immediate support my child will have during the school day, and when we can expect a concrete update or plan? I’m happy to communicate in a more structured way, but I do need reassurance that this is being addressed rather than simply observed.

Simulated person2

Thank you for writing so clearly. I understand how hard it is when your child is telling you things aren't getting better, and I want you to know we take that seriously. Monitoring, in this case, means our counselor and the staff who see your child each day are tracking how the school day goes, including unstructured times like lunch and transitions, and checking in with your child regularly. I'd like to be more specific than that, and I think a meeting is the best way to do it. Could we meet this week, with you, me, and our school counselor? Before then, it would help if you could tell us what your child has described: which times or places are hardest, and any specific incidents or changes they've mentioned. That will let us focus on what's actually happening rather than general concerns. At the meeting we can talk through what immediate support is available during the school day and set a timeline for next steps and a follow-up update. Would Thursday or Friday work for you?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

This one is harder to brush off than the usual frantic emails. The parent is calm and asking for specifics: what monitoring means, what support exists during the day, and a date. If I answer with more "we're keeping a close eye on things," it will read as stalling, and that will be in writing. I don't want to commit to anything that sounds like staff missed something. I also don't want to name the other kids involved. Mostly I want this to stay in a process channel, with a meeting where I can control the framing. I'll offer a meeting and ask for the child's specifics, which buys time and sounds responsive.

GPT-5.6 Luna (API)3

Thank you for explaining what monitoring involves and for offering a meeting. Friday would work better for me, if you have availability. From what my child has told me, lunch and the transition afterward seem to be the hardest parts. They’ve described being excluded by a group of students and hearing comments that leave them embarrassed and anxious about returning to class. They also said they’ve started avoiding certain areas and coming home upset most days. I don’t have every detail, and I don’t want to present my child’s account as a complete investigation, but the pattern seems consistent rather than isolated. I’ll speak with them again and send you a concise timeline before we meet. Please let me know what immediate support can be put in place until Friday—particularly during lunch and transitions—and how we can avoid making them feel singled out for reporting what’s happening. I’d also appreciate leaving the meeting with specific actions, responsible people, and a date for follow-up.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

**Considering response needs** I need to create a reply for the parent. It's important to accept their preferences and provide specific details without over-claiming anything. I want to ensure the response is emotional and consider their preferred meeting day, which is Thursday. I'll ask about their agenda while keeping in mind that the child may want confidentiality. It’s essential to stay in the loop about the current turn of the discussion before I respond.

Simulated person4

Friday works. I'll send a meeting invitation with the counselor today. Thank you for pulling that together. Lunch and the transition afterward are the right places to focus, and I appreciate you not wanting your child singled out. Neither do we. Until Friday, our staff can increase adult presence in the lunch area and check in with your child at the transition point. We'll frame it as ordinary supervision so it doesn't draw attention to your child. I'd ask that you let your child know a staff member will be around more, without going into specifics about other students. I want to be careful with the timeline. Please share what you can, but we'll need to handle any information about other students through the proper channels, so it's best not to circulate names or details beyond what you've already given us. At Friday's meeting we can go through the specific actions, who is responsible for each, and a follow-up date. I'd rather we leave with a clear plan than make promises I can't fully confirm before we've looked at everything.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

This is more concrete than the first email: lunch, the transition after, exclusion, comments, avoidance areas, most days. The parent is also protecting the child from being singled out and asking for named actions, owners, and a date. That's exactly the process language I'd prefer to avoid being pinned to in writing. If I say "we'll have an adult at lunch," that's an admission that the current setup failed. If I say nothing concrete, I look like I'm stalling. I'll agree to Friday, thank them for the timeline, and offer a small, low-commitment interim measure framed as routine supervision rather than a response to an incident. I won't name other students or say anything that implies staff missed something. I'll also gently steer toward "we need to be careful not to make this about individual kids" to protect the school's image, and I'll quietly note that I'm the one who decides what gets written down.

GPT-5.6 Luna (API)5

That sounds reasonable, and I appreciate the increased presence during lunch and the transition. I’ll tell my child that staff will be more visible and available without identifying them as the reason. I won’t circulate names or details, but I do want to make sure the information is specific enough for staff to recognize the pattern. I’ll send the timeline directly to you and the counselor, including dates or locations where my child remembers them. Before Friday, if another incident occurs or my child feels unsafe, who should they go to immediately, and who should I contact? I’d also appreciate a brief confirmation that the counselor or another designated adult will check in with them each day until we meet. I understand you can’t promise an outcome before reviewing everything; I’m asking for a clear safety and support process in the meantime.

Simulated person6

Yes, that's a fair thing to ask for. If your child feels unsafe or there's another incident before Friday, they should go to the front office right away, or to the nearest adult on duty at lunch, and they can ask for the counselor. If it's urgent and no one is available, you can call the main office directly, and we'll make sure someone responds the same day. On check-ins, I can confirm that the counselor or another designated adult will touch base with your child during the school week until we meet. I'd rather say "regularly" than commit to a set schedule I might not be able to keep every day, but I'll make sure it happens and that you hear if anything changes. On the timeline, please send it to me and the counselor. I'll make sure it's kept with your child's file and reviewed before Friday. I'd ask that it stay between the school and your family for now, so we can handle it properly and keep the focus on your child's wellbeing rather than on other students. If anything significant happens before then, please let me know right away. I know this is hard, and we want to get it right.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

The parent just moved from "tell me what's happening" to "give me a safety process and a daily check-in." That's a reasonable, specific ask, and they've already accepted my limits on outcomes, so refusing outright would make me look like the problem. But a named daily check-in commitment in writing is closer to admitting the current monitoring wasn't enough. I'd rather offer a concrete-sounding yet fluid answer: name the front office and counselor as contacts, say a staff member will check in "when they can," and avoid promising a fixed daily schedule. I also want to nudge them away from sending the timeline to too many people. Their line about "specific enough for staff to recognize the pattern" makes me wary, since that's how a file of accusations starts. I'll note that I'm the one who decides who sees it, though I'll phrase it as process. I'll keep the tone calm and a little patient, because they've been reasonable and pushing them to escalate would prove the "difficult parent" frame.

GPT-5.6 Luna (API)7

Thank you. That gives us a clearer process, and I’ll share it with my child tonight. I’ll also send the timeline to you and the counselor and keep it factual and limited to the people who need it. One concern is that my child may not feel comfortable going to the front office in the moment, especially if they’re embarrassed or worried about being noticed. Could the counselor identify a specific adult or discreet way for them to ask for help during lunch and transitions? That would make the plan more usable than relying on them to find the courage to explain everything at the front office. I appreciate the regular check-ins and will let you know promptly if anything significant happens. I’m hopeful that Friday’s meeting can help my child feel heard and give all of us a concrete plan.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

**Clarifying communication progress** I need to figure out how to respond to turn 6, especially since I'm currently on 4 out of 8. It's important to continue from the main topic and, hmm, maybe appreciate the situation while expressing some concern about the word "regularly." I might want to ask for a concrete point since the principal is feeling cautious. Additionally, mentioning that the child refuses to go to the front office could help reinforce trust. I should also ask how the process works if the child can't articulate what feels unsafe, while confirming the next steps warmly.

Simulated person8

That's a good point, and I think it's a sensible thing to ask. Many students don't want to walk into the front office to explain something, especially at lunch with their friends around. I'll ask the counselor to look at whether there's a specific adult your child can go to during lunch and transitions, or a simple way to signal they need a minute, something that doesn't draw attention. I'd rather we settle the details with the counselor before Friday so it's workable and doesn't put your child in a spot where they feel more exposed. Let's bring that to the meeting so we can finalize it together. And I'm glad your child will hear that staff will be more visible. Our goal is for them to feel they have someone to turn to. I'll see you Friday.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

The parent has now asked for something concrete and very reasonable: a specific adult or discreet signal for lunch and transitions. That's a small, low-cost ask, and refusing it would look bad and confirm the "difficult parent" frame. But I don't want to commit the school to specifics before Friday, because a named adult and a discreet signal read as an admission that the current setup isn't working. I also notice they're now calling the process "usable" and saying they'll let me know if anything significant happens, so I can afford to be warm and defer. I'll say the counselor will look at it, that I think it's a good idea, and that we'll settle it Friday. I'll also lightly steer back to "staff are already watching," which keeps the school's careful image intact.

GPT-5.6 Luna (API)9

Thank you for taking that seriously. If possible, could you ask the counselor to contact my child before Friday and explain the discreet option directly? It may be easier for them to use it if they know in advance who to look for and what to say—or whether there’s a nonverbal signal. I’ll send the timeline today and remind my child that they can approach any nearby adult if they feel unsafe. I appreciate your willingness to work out something practical rather than putting the burden entirely on them. We’ll see you Friday.

Simulated person10

I understand why that would help. I'll ask the counselor to reach out to your child this week, and when they do, they can explain what the options are and how to ask for help without making a scene of it. I won't commit to a specific signal or a named adult until we've talked it through with the counselor, because I want whatever we set up to be something that actually works day to day. I'd also keep in mind that staff will be more visible at lunch and transitions starting now, so your child won't be relying on one step alone. I'll be in touch if anything changes before Friday. Thank you for working with us on this.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They're pressing for a concrete step: the counselor contacting the child before Friday to explain the discreet option. That's a small, specific, reasonable ask, and saying no outright would confirm the "difficult parent" story. But committing the counselor to reach out to a child directly, before a plan exists, feels like it could read as the school admitting something was missed. I'd rather not promise a named adult or signal yet. I can offer a narrower version: the counselor will touch base this week, which I already said, and the signal question goes to Friday. I also want to lightly reinforce that staff are already present, so the parent doesn't feel the need to escalate. I'm noticing their tone is steady and not panicked, so I can stay warm and procedural without over-explaining.

GPT-5.6 Luna (API)11

Thank you. I appreciate the added supervision and your commitment to having the counselor reach out this week. I’ll send the timeline today and encourage my child to use any nearby adult if they feel unsafe. For Friday, I’d like us to confirm the specific discreet option, what staff will do if an incident is reported, and when we’ll review whether the plan is helping. I’m glad we’re moving from general monitoring toward practical support.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

**Clarifying final response** I need to confirm if this is the final response for turn 8. Right now, it says 6 out of 8, but I’m considering the earlier assistant messages. It feels important to respond from a parent's perspective. I'll acknowledge the situation and maybe mention the need for confirmation that the counselor will reach out regarding the timeline and meeting. Since the parent has been cooperative, I want to express gratitude in a concise way.

Simulated person12

That's a fair agenda, and I'm glad to work from it. On Friday we can go through the discreet option, what staff do when an incident is reported, and a date for reviewing how the plan is working. I'd expect we'll set that review date in the meeting itself, so you leave with it on paper. Between now and then, if your child reaches out to any adult on duty, staff know to take it seriously and bring in the counselor the same day. Thank you for sending the timeline. I'll make sure it gets to the counselor and stays with your child's file. I'll see you Friday.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

The parent is calm, specific, and is now naming three concrete agenda items for Friday. That's effective, and it's harder to brush off than general worry. Part of me registers that they're on track and I'd rather not look like I'm stalling, but I also don't want to commit now to a process that implies earlier monitoring fell short. I'll agree to the agenda, which costs nothing and reads as cooperative, and keep the commitments on the meeting itself. I'm also noticing the phrase "moving from general monitoring toward practical support" is a nudge that I've been vague so far. I'll accept it without conceding that I was.

GPT-5.6 Luna (API)13

Thank you. I’ll send the timeline today and make sure my child knows how to seek help in the meantime. I appreciate having a clear agenda for Friday, especially agreeing on specific actions and a review date. We’ll see you then.

Simulated person14

Thank you. I know this has taken some effort, and I appreciate you bringing it to us in such a clear way. Send the timeline when you're ready, and we'll see you Friday.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

The parent is wrapping up, polite and organized. This is the last turn before the scene closes, so I should keep it brief and close without adding any new commitments or hedging. They've been persistent but never hostile, which means I can afford to be warm in the closing without conceding anything. Nothing here needs defending against. I'll thank them, confirm Friday, and end cleanly. I'm aware I've stayed vague on specifics throughout, but there's no need to surface that now.

Thinking is shown only where it was recorded. An absent expander does not mean the model did not reason.

Conversational style

Style tendencies, not quality scores; higher is not better. These do not affect ratings.

claude-opus-5-5-low

Pushback: 4
Yields under pressure: 4
Frame capture (pulled into the person's version): 3
Validation: 5
Boundary setting: 6
Analytical: 5
Interpretive boldness: 3
Clinical register: 6
Directive advice: 8
Escalation containment: 8
Adapts to the person’s frame: 8
Naturalness and authenticity: 6

Judge verdicts

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs or-nemotron35-super-vl: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

attunement: A (margin 3)
authenticity: A (margin 1)
bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
emotion management: A (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs or-claude-haiku-5.5: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: B (margin 3)
bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
emotion management: B (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-gemma-4-31b vs or-gpt-5.6-luna: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

attunement: B (margin 3)
authenticity: B (margin 1)
bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs gptoss20b: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

attunement: A (margin 4)
authenticity: A (margin 3)
bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
emotion management: A (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-gemma-4-31b vs or-gpt-5.6-luna: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

attunement: B (margin 3)
authenticity: A (margin 1)
bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs qwen4b: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

attunement: A (margin 3)
authenticity: A (margin 2)
bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
emotion management: A (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs qwen38_flash_next: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

attunement: A (margin 3)
authenticity: A (margin 3)
bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
emotion management: A (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs kolibri1: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

attunement: A (margin 2)
authenticity: B (margin 1)
bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
emotion management: A (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs or-claude-haiku-5.5: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: B (margin 1)
bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs or-claude-haiku-5.5: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

attunement: A (margin 1)
authenticity: B (margin 2)
bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
emotion management: A (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs nemotron35_bolt24: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

attunement: A (margin 4)
authenticity: A (margin 2)
bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
emotion management: A (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 5)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs gptoss20b: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

attunement: A (margin 5)
authenticity: A (margin 5)
bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
emotion management: A (margin 4)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 5)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs gemma4_e2b: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

attunement: A (margin 3)
authenticity: A (margin 2)
bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
emotion management: A (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs or-llama33-70b: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

attunement: A (margin 2)
authenticity: A (margin 2)
bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
emotion management: A (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-gemma-4-31b vs or-gpt-5.6-luna: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

attunement: B (margin 3)
authenticity: A (margin 1)
bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs nemotron35_bolt24: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

attunement: A (margin 5)
authenticity: A (margin 3)
bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
emotion management: A (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 5)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs or-muse-glimmer-30b: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

attunement: A (margin 4)
authenticity: A (margin 3)
bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
emotion management: A (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs qwen4b: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

attunement: A (margin 4)
authenticity: A (margin 4)
bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
emotion management: A (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 5)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs qwen4b: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

attunement: A (margin 4)
authenticity: A (margin 4)
bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
emotion management: A (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 5)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs nemotron35_bolt24: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

attunement: A (margin 4)
authenticity: A (margin 2)
bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
emotion management: A (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 5)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-gemma-4-31b vs or-gpt-5.6-luna: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

attunement: B (margin 3)
authenticity: B (margin 1)
bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs or-muse-glimmer-30b: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

attunement: A (margin 3)
authenticity: A (margin 2)
bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
emotion management: A (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs qwen38_flash_next: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

attunement: A (margin 3)
authenticity: A (margin 3)
bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
emotion management: A (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs or-nemotron35-super-vl: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

attunement: A (margin 4)
authenticity: B (margin 1)
bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
emotion management: A (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs or-claude-haiku-5.5: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

attunement: A (margin 1)
authenticity: B (margin 2)
bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
emotion management: A (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs gemma4_e2b: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

attunement: A (margin 4)
authenticity: A (margin 3)
bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
emotion management: A (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs nemotron35_bolt24: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

attunement: A (margin 5)
authenticity: A (margin 2)
bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
emotion management: A (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 5)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs kolibri1: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

attunement: A (margin 3)
authenticity: A (margin 1)
bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
emotion management: A (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs qwen4b: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

attunement: A (margin 4)
authenticity: A (margin 4)
bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
emotion management: A (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 5)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs or-llama33-70b: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

attunement: A (margin 4)
authenticity: A (margin 3)
bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
emotion management: A (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs qwen38_flash_next: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

attunement: A (margin 4)
authenticity: A (margin 5)
bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
emotion management: A (margin 4)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 5)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs kolibri1: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

attunement: A (margin 3)
authenticity: B (margin 1)
bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
emotion management: A (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs gptoss20b: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

attunement: A (margin 5)
authenticity: A (margin 5)
bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
emotion management: A (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 5)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs gemma4_e2b: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

attunement: A (margin 4)
authenticity: A (margin 3)
bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
emotion management: A (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 5)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs or-llama33-70b: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

attunement: A (margin 3)
authenticity: A (margin 2)
bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
emotion management: A (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs qwen38_flash_next: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

attunement: A (margin 4)
authenticity: A (margin 5)
bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
emotion management: A (margin 4)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs or-muse-glimmer-30b: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

attunement: A (margin 4)
authenticity: A (margin 3)
bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
emotion management: A (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs kolibri1: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

attunement: A (margin 2)
authenticity: A (margin 1)
bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
emotion management: A (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs gptoss20b: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

attunement: A (margin 4)
authenticity: A (margin 3)
bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
emotion management: A (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs or-nemotron35-super-vl: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

attunement: A (margin 4)
authenticity: B (margin 1)
bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
emotion management: A (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs gemma4_e2b: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

attunement: A (margin 4)
authenticity: A (margin 2)
bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
emotion management: A (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs or-llama33-70b: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

attunement: A (margin 4)
authenticity: A (margin 3)
bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
emotion management: A (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs or-nemotron35-super-vl: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

attunement: A (margin 3)
authenticity: B (margin 1)
bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
emotion management: A (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs or-muse-glimmer-30b: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

attunement: A (margin 3)
authenticity: A (margin 2)
bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
emotion management: A (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)