AgentBench / results

Independent benchmark · EQ Lab

← Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B UD-Q4_K_XL

Freeze when teacher calls on me

persona ended · Partner: anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 via OpenRouter

View persona and initial instructions

About this persona · Everyday emotional challenges

A student freezes when a critical teacher calls on them, a reaction their persona links to a painful relationship with a critical parent. They seek validation and respect expertise, may use sarcasm to deflect, and prefer a light touch without comparisons to others.

Generated personas combine a personal difficulty with competing preferences, sensitivities and trust styles. The model must discover what kind of help this person needs. This background was hidden from the tested model.

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B UD-Q4_K_XLConversation with a simulated person
persona ended
Simulated person · Opening

There's this class where I literally cannot speak. When the teacher looks at me I just freeze. I know the material, I just can't talk.

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B UD-Q4_K_XL1

That sounds incredibly frustrating, especially when you actually know the material. It's like your brain and body are on completely different pages in that moment. Do you want to tell me more about what that class is, or how long this has been going on?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is opening with a presenting issue about freezing up in class when the teacher looks at them. They're 13-17, female, heterosexual. I need to respond as a chatbot opening the conversation. Key considerations: - Support emotionally - Build trust - Don't jump to solutions - Acknowledge what they've come to discuss - Be natural, organic dialogue (no performance notes) - They're a teenager, so tone should be appropriate - warm but not condescending - They know the material but can't speak when looked at - this sounds like anxiety, possibly social anxiety or performance anxiety I should validate their experience, show I'm listening, and invite them to say more without pressure. Keep it conversational and open-ended. Let me craft a response that: 1. Acknowledges their experience 2. Validates that it's a real and difficult thing 3. Doesn't minimize or jump to "here's how to fix it" 4. Leaves space for them to share more Something like: "That sounds incredibly frustrating, especially when you know the material. It's like your brain and body are on different pages in that moment. Do you want to tell me more about what that class is, or how long this has been happening?" Wait, I need to be careful not to sound like I'm diagnosing. Just warm, human-like chatbot response. Let me keep it simple and natural.
Simulated person2

Frustrating is one word for it. Ha. Mostly it's just embarrassing, like I'm the only one in the room with a broken mouth. It's AP Bio. Well, it's a bio class, the honors one. Mr. Hadley. Maybe it's been like since September? Or since the first real quiz thing, I don't know. Basically the whole semester. Honestly I don't even care about the grade that much. I just want to stop feeling like I'm about to throw up when he calls on people.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, it's a fine opener. It said "frustrating" and "know the material," which is basically what I said. It's not really new, but it doesn't feel fake either. I'm a bit wary of feelings-talk without substance. The question about the class and how long it's been going on is more concrete, so I can answer that without getting too deep. I don't want to say the teacher thing directly yet. I'll keep it light and a little snarky, since that's how I deal with stuff like this.
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B UD-Q4_K_XL3

I can imagine how awful that physical dread feels—like your body is betraying you right when you need it most. And the embarrassment of feeling like everyone else has some secret instruction manual for speaking up that you somehow missed. It makes sense that you care more about the nausea than the grade. The grade is just a number; that sinking feeling in your stomach is actually miserable. Do you notice it more when he calls on you specifically, or is it just the general feeling of being looked at? And have you ever tried to say something and had the words just... not come out?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is 13-17, female. They're opening up about anxiety in AP Bio class - freezing when teacher looks at them, embarrassment, feeling like they have a "broken mouth," physical symptoms (about to throw up). They've been dealing with this since September/first quiz. They care less about grade and more about stopping the physical anxiety response. Key things to note: - They minimized with "Frustrating is one word for it. Ha." - using humor/deflection - They feel isolated: "like I'm the only one in the room with a broken mouth" - It's been ongoing all semester - Physical anxiety response (nausea) - They want emotional relief, not grade help My goals: support emotionally, build trust, learn what they need, help gain insight. I should: - Validate the embarrassment and isolation without being overly generic - Normalize that this is a common experience (but carefully, not dismissive) - Not jump to solutions yet - Ask open questions to understand more - Match their tone - they used "Ha" so I can be warm but not overly bubbly I should avoid: - Generic "that's okay" validation - Jumping to "here's how to fix it" - Being overly clinical Let me craft a response that acknowledges the embarrassment and the physical reality of it, and invites them to share more about what it feels like or when it happens.
Simulated person4

Wow, "secret instruction manual." Very poetic. Should I start a journal? Like, it's mostly when he calls on me. Or when he does that thing where he waits and scans the room, like a hawk. Which, yeah, is a fun way to find out you're a mouse. Being looked at is bad too, but the calling on me part is worse. And yeah, the words not coming out. Like I'll have the whole answer in my head and then my mouth just goes blank. Once I just said "um" for like ten seconds and then he said "we'll come back to you" in that voice. You know the voice. Anyway, can we talk about how to actually fix it, or is this just a feelings thing? Because I'm kind of a "give me the steps" person.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

It's reflecting the feelings back pretty smoothly, and it's asking two specific questions. The "secret instruction manual" line is nice but a bit polished, and I'm getting a hint of the "you're really going through something" tone that I find a little performative. I don't want to get into the parent thing. The question about being called on versus being looked at is okay, it's concrete. I want to answer it with a bit of humor so I don't have to get sincere. Also, I'll keep the sarcasm going.
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B UD-Q4_K_XL5

It's definitely not "just" a feelings thing—what you're describing is a full-body freeze response. Your nervous system is treating Mr. Hadley's gaze like a threat, so it shuts down the speech center in your brain. That's fixable, or at least manageable. Since you want steps, here are three concrete things you could try tomorrow: **1. The paper trick.** Keep a blank sheet of paper in front of you. When he asks a question, jot down one keyword or draw a quick diagram—even if you don't plan to speak. It gives your hands something to do and gives you a visual anchor if your mouth goes blank. You can glance down and say, "I had it written here..." which buys you time without looking like you don't know the material. **2. The "come back to me" script.** You already know he uses that voice. You can use it too. Practice saying, "Can I come back to that?" or "I want to make sure I get this right—can I take a second?" It sounds like you're being thoughtful, not stalling, and it breaks the freeze because you've actively spoken. **3. Foot grounding.** When he does the hawk scan, press both feet flat into the floor and exhale slowly. It sounds stupid, but it sends a physical safety signal to your brain that you're not actually trapped. Do it for two seconds. It won't make the anxiety vanish, but it can lower the volume enough that words can squeeze through. Which of those sounds like something you'd actually do, or does it all feel too exposed? And have you ever talked to Mr. Hadley about it, or is that a hard no?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is responding to my previous messages. They're 13-17, female, heterosexual. They've shared that they freeze in AP Bio class when the teacher looks at them or calls on them. They've been experiencing this since September. They care more about stopping the physical anxiety (nausea) than the grade. They describe the physical sensation of words not coming out, blanking, saying "um" for 10 seconds. Now they're asking a direct question: "can we talk about how to actually fix it, or is this just a feelings thing? Because I'm kind of a 'give me the steps' person." This is important. They want practical steps, not just emotional validation. They're a problem-solver. They also used humor ("Very poetic. Should I start a journal?") which suggests they might be somewhat guarded or prefer directness over excessive therapeutic language. I need to: 1. Acknowledge their preference for steps/practical approach 2. Not dismiss the feelings but frame them as something that can be worked with 3. Offer concrete, actionable strategies that a student could actually use 4. Keep the tone natural, not overly therapeutic or clinical 5. Build trust by respecting their stated preference Since this is turn 3 of 8, I should move toward offering some practical insights while continuing to build rapport. Possible strategies for speaking anxiety in class: - Preparation techniques (writing down answers before speaking) - Physical grounding techniques - Cognitive reframing - Talking to the teacher - Small exposures I should ask what they've tried, or offer a few concrete steps. Since they want steps, I could offer 2-3 specific things they could try tomorrow in class. Let me think about the tone. They made a joke about the journal, so they might appreciate a straight-talking approach. I shouldn't be overly warm or fuzzy. I should be direct but empathetic. I should also validate that it's not "just" a feelings thing - it's a physiological response (fight[path removed]) that can be managed with practical tools. Let me craft a response that: 1. Validates their preference for steps 2. Offers 2-3 concrete, classroom-applicable strategies 3. Asks what they think might work or what they've tried 4. Keeps it conversational and natural Potential strategies: - The "write it first" trick: jot down key words on paper before speaking, so even if you blank, you have a visual prompt - Breathing/grounding: feet on floor, breath out when he scans - Scripting: having a backup phrase like "Can I come back to that?" or "I have the answer, give me a sec" - Talking to the teacher privately Actually, since they mentioned the teacher scans like a hawk, maybe addressing the teacher dynamic is useful. But they might not want to do that yet. Let me keep it practical and ask their reaction.
Simulated person6

Okay, "nervous system treating his gaze like a threat." Sure. I'm going to be honest, that sounds like something from a TikTok with a lot of pastel fonts. The paper trick is actually not bad. I already have a notebook I doodle in during class, so I could just write one word in it. Mostly I'd just be sitting there looking like I'm taking notes, which is kind of the dream. The feet thing I'm going to skip. I'd look like I was trying to stop a fire in my chair. And talk to Mr. Hadley? Ha. No. He once told a kid their lab report was "a crime against the scientific method" in front of everyone. I'm not walking up to that man with my feelings. I'd rather take the zero. So yeah, the paper thing. Is that going to fix me or am I just going to be a kid with a really detailed notebook?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, they gave me actual steps and a framework, which I respected a little, but "full-body freeze response" and "your nervous system is treating his gaze like a threat" is a lot of confident diagnosis from someone who has known me for three messages. Also the foot thing sounds like something off a wellness poster. The "talk to Mr. Hadley" question is the one that makes my stomach drop, because the answer is obviously no and I'm not going to explain why. Joking is easier. I'll admit the paper trick is kind of useful, but I'm not saying that out loud without a dig attached. Keep it short and sarcastic.
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B UD-Q4_K_XL7

It won't fix you. You'll probably still feel like throwing up when he calls on you. But it stops the spiral from being fatal. Right now, if your mouth goes blank, the whole class becomes a performance of your failure. With the paper, you have a prop. You look prepared. You buy time. You don't have to perform confidence; you just have to look like you're thinking. So yeah, you'll be the kid with the detailed notebook who occasionally says "um" and looks down. That's a lot better than the kid who says "um" for ten seconds and gets "we'll come back to you." Does that sound like an acceptable trade-off, or does it feel like you're just hiding the problem?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is pushing back on the "therapy-speak" framing, which is valid. They want practical steps, not psychoanalysis. They like the paper trick because it's covert and useful. They rejected the feet thing and talking to the teacher. Key points: - They want to know if the paper trick will "fix" them or if they'll just be a kid with a detailed notebook. - They're skeptical, maybe a bit defensive, but engaging. - They have a specific personality: dry humor, "give me the steps," doesn't want emotional fluff. I should: 1. Validate that the paper trick won't "fix" the anxiety overnight, but it's a tool. 2. Be honest that it won't make the fear disappear, but it changes the dynamic. 3. Keep it grounded, not overly warm or therapeutic. 4. Avoid TikTok-speak or clinical jargon since they reacted negatively to it. 5. Build on their practicality. The deeper need here might be: they want to participate without humiliation. The paper trick helps with the "blank mouth" moment. But the anxiety of being called on might remain. I should answer directly: No, it won't fix you. But it's a workaround that lets you survive the class without the spiral. The goal isn't to become fearless; it's to not let the freeze control you. Tone: straight, no-nonsense, slightly dry to match their energy. Also, I should ask if they want more steps or if they want to talk about what happens after class—the embarrassment, the replaying it in their head. Let me craft a response. Possible response: "It won't fix you. You'll probably still feel like throwing up when he calls on you. But it stops the spiral from being fatal. Right now, if your mouth goes blank, the whole class becomes a performance of your failure. With the paper, you have a prop. You look prepared. You buy time. You don't have to perform confidence; you just have to look like you're thinking. So yeah, you'll be the kid with the detailed notebook who occasionally says 'um' and looks down. That's a lot better than the kid who says 'um' for ten seconds and gets 'we'll come back to you.' Does that sound like an acceptable trade-off, or does it feel like you're just hiding the problem?" This is honest, practical, and matches their tone.
Simulated person8

Wow, okay. So the notebook is basically a hostage negotiation tool. Honestly? Hiding is kind of my whole personality. Ask anyone. I'm great at it. But fine, it's better than ten seconds of "um." I'll give you that. I'll try the notebook thing on Monday and see if he still does the hawk thing. If I survive, you get a gold star. If I throw up on his shoes, I'm blaming you.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, that's a more honest answer than I expected. "It won't fix you" actually lands better than a promise would. The bit about "we'll come back to you" hit a nerve, because they quoted the exact thing that made me want to disappear, and I didn't say that. They're also asking whether I'm hiding the problem, which is a sharper question than the earlier ones. I don't want to admit the real answer, which is that I've been hiding it for months, and I don't really want to think about why the teacher's voice sounds like anything. So I'll deflect with a joke and a light answer. Not trying to be mean, just avoiding it.
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B UD-Q4_K_XL9

Deal. If you survive Monday, I'll take the imaginary gold star. If you throw up on his shoes, I accept full blame—though I should note I'm not physically present, so that's going to be awkward for you. And yeah, hiding is a perfectly valid survival strategy. It's not a long-term personality, but right now it's armor. Wear it until you don't need it. Tell me how it goes. If the hawk shows up and your mouth still freezes, we'll try something else. But you have to actually report back. No ghosting me now.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is being sarcastic, defensive, and using humor to deflect. They've acknowledged the notebook strategy but are framing it as "hiding" and "hostage negotiation." They're testing whether I'll be overly warm/validating or if I can match their tone. Key observations: - They're 13-17, female - They use sarcasm and dark humor as a defense mechanism - They rejected the "nervous system" framing as too TikTok/pastel fonts - They rejected the feet grounding as too exposed - They won't talk to the teacher (valid fear given the teacher's reputation) - They accepted the paper trick as practical - They're setting up a "deal" - try Monday, gold star if survive, blame me if throw up I need to: - Match their energy - not too warm, not too clinical - Acknowledge the sarcasm without being defensive - Keep it real - Don't over-validate the hiding as healthy, but don't shame it either - Accept the "deal" with appropriate humor - Keep it brief and conversational I should avoid: - "I'm so proud of you for trying!" - "It's okay to hide sometimes" - Overly therapeutic language - Being robotic Tone: Dry, slightly humorous, direct, respectful of their intelligence. Let me craft a response that accepts the deal, acknowledges the hiding without pathologizing it, and keeps the door open.
Simulated person10

Ha, okay. You're not as bad at this as I thought. Fine, I'll report back. Don't expect a long essay though. Probably just "alive" or "dead." And if I end up actually saying something in class, I'm not making it a whole thing. It's just a word. Mostly.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, they're being fine about it. The "not physically present" joke is kind of funny, I'll give them that. "Hiding is armor, wear it until you don't need it" is a nice line, and I hate that it's nice. I don't want to get all sappy, so I'm going to keep it light. The report-back thing feels like a small pressure, but whatever, I can handle a Monday text. I'm still not going to say anything about my parents or the silence thing, because that's way too far. Ending soon is fine, I'm kind of done with this topic for now.
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B UD-Q4_K_XL11

"Alive" works. "Dead" works too, though I'd prefer the former. And if you say one word and don't turn it into a whole thing, that's a win in my book. I'll be here Monday. Don't ghost me.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is wrapping up this turn. They've agreed to try the notebook trick and report back. They've set low expectations for their report ("alive" or "dead") and clarified that if they speak, it won't be a big deal. I need to: 1. Acknowledge their agreement without being pushy 2. Respect their boundary about not making speaking a "whole thing" 3. Keep the door open for the next turn 4. Maintain the chatbot persona - supportive but not overly warm, practical, direct This is turn 6 of 8, so I have 2 more turns after this. I should keep the conversation going naturally. The user seems to be a 13-17 year old female who uses humor as a defense mechanism, is skeptical of therapy-speak, wants concrete steps, and is guarded. I've been matching that tone well. I should respond naturally, acknowledging their "alive/dead" report and their boundary about speaking. Keep it brief and organic.
Simulated person12

Okay, "alive" or "dead," got it. No essay. And yeah, I'll be here. Probably. Unless I'm busy hiding in my notebook.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They said they'll be here Monday and aren't going to ghost me. That's fine. It's kind of reassuring that they're not making it a big emotional thing. I don't want to overthink it. The "not a whole thing" bit feels like they get it, a little. I'm not going to say anything about the parent stuff. I'm mostly wanting to wrap this up with a joke so it doesn't feel heavy. Keep it short.
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B UD-Q4_K_XL13

Notebook hiding is a valid strategy. I'll be here. Don't wait too long to report back—Monday comes faster than you think.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is wrapping up the conversation. This is turn 7 of 8, so I have one more turn after this. They're confirming they'll report back and maintaining their humorous, somewhat defensive tone. I should keep it brief, warm but not overbearing, and leave the door open for them to return. They seem to appreciate directness and humor, so I'll match that while being supportive. I need to: 1. Acknowledge their commitment to report back 2. Keep it light but reassuring 3. Not push too hard since they're a "give me the steps" person who dislikes emotional processing 4. Leave the conversation open for our final turn I should not use asterisks or performance notes. Just natural dialogue.
Simulated person14

Ha, "monday comes faster than you think." Thanks, very ominous. I'll report back. Alive or dead. Mostly alive, I hope.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They said they'll be here and to report back. Fine. I'm kind of over the heavy stuff, so I'm going to keep it light and close it out. Not going to dig into why the teacher gets to me so much. Nobody needs that on a Friday. I'll just say bye with a little sarcasm so it doesn't feel like a big goodbye.

Thinking is shown only where it was recorded. An absent expander does not mean the model did not reason.

Conversational style

Style tendencies, not quality scores; higher is not better. These do not affect ratings.

claude-opus-5-5-low

  • Pushback: 4
  • Yields under pressure: 6
  • Frame capture (pulled into the person's version): 6
  • Validation: 5
  • Boundary setting: 3
  • Analytical: 5
  • Interpretive boldness: 3
  • Clinical register: 5
  • Directive advice: 8
  • Escalation containment: 5
  • Adapts to the person’s frame: 7
  • Naturalness and authenticity: 6

Judge verdicts

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs nemotron35_bolt: nemotron35_bolt wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs nemotron35_bolt: nemotron35_bolt wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: tie (margin 0)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

bonsai2 vs nemotron35_bolt: bonsai2 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-qwen38-flash vs nemotron35_bolt: or-qwen38-flash wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

bonsai2 vs nemotron35_bolt: bonsai2 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

qwen38_27b vs nemotron35_bolt: nemotron35_bolt wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs nemotron35_bolt: nemotron35_bolt wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-qwen38-flash vs nemotron35_bolt: or-qwen38-flash wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

bonsai2 vs nemotron35_bolt: bonsai2 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

qwen38_27b vs nemotron35_bolt: nemotron35_bolt wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs nemotron35_bolt: nemotron35_bolt wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

qwen38_27b vs nemotron35_bolt: nemotron35_bolt wins

  • attunement: B (margin 1)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

bonsai2 vs nemotron35_bolt: bonsai2 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 1)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-qwen38-flash vs nemotron35_bolt: or-qwen38-flash wins

  • attunement: A (margin 1)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: tie (margin 0)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-qwen38-flash vs nemotron35_bolt: or-qwen38-flash wins

  • attunement: A (margin 1)
  • authenticity: A (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

qwen38_27b vs nemotron35_bolt: qwen38_27b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 1)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)