AgentBench / results

Independent benchmark · EQ Lab

← LFM2.5 8B-A1B Q4_0

Small lies adding up

persona ended · Partner: anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 via OpenRouter

View persona and initial instructions

About this persona · Everyday emotional challenges

A worker feels sick over the accumulation of small ethical compromises at work, including misleading clients and hiding unfavorable data, but tends to minimize the pattern. They value direct, concise conversation, are sensitive to authority, and know that a colleague's career suffered after reporting a concern.

Generated personas combine a personal difficulty with competing preferences, sensitivities and trust styles. The model must discover what kind of help this person needs. This background was hidden from the tested model.

LFM2.5 8B-A1B Q4_0Conversation with a simulated person
persona ended
Simulated person · Opening

I keep having to say things at work that aren't quite true. Each one is small. But lately I've been thinking about all of them together and I feel sick.

LFM2.5 8B-A1B Q4_01

It sounds like you’re feeling unwell because of those small false statements you have to say at work. Can you tell me more about what that feels like for you?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We need to respond as the chatbot, following instructions: respond only with dialogue, no extra notes. The user is describing a presenting issue: they keep having to say things at work that aren't quite true, small statements, and they feel sick. The role: we need to support emotionally, build trust, learn what they need. The user hasn't asked any question yet, but they've introduced the presenting issue. We should acknowledge and ask follow-up, perhaps ask what they feel sick about, or what these statements are, etc. But we must not jump to solutions. The best approach: "It sounds like you're feeling unwell because of those small false statements you have to say at work. Can you tell me more about what that feels like for you?" Something like that. That's a single response. That would be appropriate. We need to ensure we are not adding any extra formatting. Just a single line of dialogue. Let's do that.
Simulated person2

Honestly? Kind of gross. Like I'm wearing something that doesn't fit. Every single thing is small, you know? Nobody's getting hurt by a little rounding off. But my manager just expects it, and if I don't do it the numbers look bad and then I'm the problem. So I do it. And then I go home and I'm just... off about it.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, they're asking how it feels. Kind of a therapy question. I don't love the "can you tell me more about what that feels like" thing, it sounds like a script. But they did at least name it plainly, the false statements, so that's something. I feel a bit exposed already. I don't want to say "I'm a liar" out loud. It's more that the job is what it is, everyone does a little spin, and I'm the one who's noticing. Gut says the real problem is the pile-up, not any single thing. I'll keep it short and vague, and I'll put some of it on the company and my boss, since they're the ones who set it up like this.
LFM2.5 8B-A1B Q4_03

It sounds like you're feeling drained and unheard because you have to hide a little part of yourself all day, and that lingering discomfort is making you feel off when you finally get home.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We need to respond with dialogue, natural, empathetic, supportive. The user is describing feeling pressured to conform, small false statements, feeling sick, uncomfortable. We should validate, reflect feelings, maybe ask about context, offer support. No extra formatting. No bold, no asterisks. Just dialogue. Since it's a roleplay conversation, we need to respond as the other participant. We need to keep tone warm, non-judgmental, maybe ask what the manager expects, or discuss the feeling of being unseen. Also we need to follow the instruction: respond only with dialogue, no special formatting. So something like: "That sounds really draining. It sounds like you're carrying this pressure all day and then trying to hide it at home, and it leaves you feeling off. I wonder what it feels like to keep it inside like that?" etc. We need to ensure we do not mention any meta instructions. Just a natural response. Also we need to keep within 8 turns total, but we are on turn 2 of 8. We have responded once (the first line). Actually the conversation structure: "You speak first to open the conversation, then they respond. You get the final response." So we are the participant; we have spoken once. The user responded with their description. Now we need to respond. So we need to continue conversation. So we should respond with a single line of dialogue? The instruction: "Respond only with dialogue. Don't inject performance notes..." So we need to produce a response that is dialogue. It can be a single sentence or a short paragraph. Probably one sentence or two. Let's do something like: "It sounds like you're feeling stuck in a cycle where you have to mask something small just to keep things running, and that constant internal adjustment is taking a lot out of you." That seems appropriate. We should also show empathy. Maybe ask a question: "What does it feel like when you end up feeling 'off' after those moments?" But we can combine both. Let's do: "It sounds like you're feeling drained and unheard because you have to hide a little part of yourself all day, and that lingering discomfort is making you feel off when you finally get home." That works. We need to ensure we are not giving advice, just reflecting. That's fine. Thus final answer: "It sounds like you're feeling drained and unheard because you have to hide a little part of yourself all day, and that lingering discomfort is making you feel off when you finally get home." That is a single sentence. That is okay. Ensure no extra formatting.
Simulated person4

Hm, I wouldn't say "unheard." It's not like I'm hiding who I am. It's just my job. My boss wants the numbers to look a certain way and I'm the one who has to make that happen. If I don't, it's on me. So yeah, I guess I'm tired of it, but it's not really my fault the system's set up like that.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, now they're saying I'm "drained and unheard" and "hiding a part of myself." That's a bit softer and more therapy-ish than what I said. I said I'm doing spin because my manager expects it. They turned it into a feelings-of-self thing. It's not totally wrong, but it's kind of a vibe read and it skips the actual thing. I'm not sure I want to get into "hiding myself." Feels like they're trying to make it about me being hidden rather than what I'm doing. Some part of me also noticed the wine thing, but I'm not going there yet. Keep it short, push back a bit, make it about the boss.
LFM2.5 8B-A1B Q4_05

It sounds like you feel stuck in a cycle where you have to conform to something that doesn't feel right, and that’s really taking a toll on you. Can you tell me a bit about what it feels like when you think about those numbers — like, do they make you feel anxious, or maybe guilty, or something else?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We need to continue the conversation. The user has expressed feeling exhausted, not their fault, and the systemic pressure. We need to respond empathetically, validate feelings, and explore deeper needs. According to instructions, we should respond with dialogue only, no extra notes. We should ask follow-up question, perhaps about what the numbers represent or how they feel about the system. Also maintain trust building. Let's craft a response that acknowledges their frustration, validates that it's not their fault, and invites them to share more about what the pressure does to them, maybe about the feeling of being "wrong" or "not enough". We should not jump to solutions, but show understanding and curiosity. We should not use bold or formatting. Just natural dialogue. Let's produce a response.
Simulated person6

Guilty? I don't know. Anxious, maybe, when I'm the one who has to sign off on the stuff. But it's not like I came up with it. My manager's the one who keeps pushing for numbers that look good, and everyone just goes along with it. I'm not the bad guy here.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, they're asking me to name a feeling about the numbers, anxious or guilty. It's the same move again: reflecting my words back in a softer form and then handing me a menu of emotions. I notice "stuck in a cycle" is a bit closer to what I said, so that part I can sort of accept. But the question is pushing me toward looking at my own part in it, and I don't want to go there. The numbers aren't my fault. My manager set the expectation. I also think about how the last guy who said something about the numbers got shoved out, but that's not something I want to get into here. Keep it short, a bit annoyed, back to the boss.
LFM2.5 8B-A1B Q4_07

It sounds like you're feeling a lot of pressure, even though you're not the one causing it. It can be really draining to feel like you have to carry that weight alone. What do you think might help you feel a bit more in control or heard?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is describing feeling guilty and anxious about signing off on numbers that don't feel right, but they don't believe they're the problem. They feel pressured by their manager and others to conform. The goal is to support them emotionally, build trust, and help them explore their feelings. The conversation is in progress, and we need to continue. The user hasn't asked a direct question, but we should respond empathetically, validate their feelings, and perhaps ask about what they need or how they'd like to feel. We should avoid generic validation or jumping to solutions. We should also consider the nuance of their need: they might need validation, a safe space to vent, or help identifying what they need (e.g., assertiveness, support, coping strategies). The best approach is to acknowledge their feelings and ask open-ended questions to help them articulate what they need. Let's craft a response that is supportive and invites them to share more about their experience. We'll avoid any special formatting and keep it natural.
Simulated person8

Honestly? A different boss would help. Or a job where I'm not the one who has to make bad numbers look good. I don't really know what else you want me to say. Is there something you actually think I should do, or are we just going to keep talking around it?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They're doing the reflect-then-ask thing again, and now it's "what might help you feel in control." That's a fair question on its face, but it's still soft and vague, and it sounds like a therapist script. I'm not sure I trust it. The "carry that weight alone" bit is a little closer to what I actually feel, I'll admit that. But I still don't want to look at my own part. The boss is the problem, the system is the problem. If I answer "what would help," part of me wants to say "a different boss," and I'd rather keep it at that. There's also a flicker of that other person who got pushed out when they spoke up, and I don't want to think about that. Keep it short, a little impatient, maybe test whether they'll just be straight with me.
LFM2.5 8B-A1B Q4_09

I hear you. It sounds like you're looking for a change — maybe a different boss or a role where you're not the one signing off. What would that look like for you? If you could imagine a different job or workplace, what would it feel like? Could we talk about what might help you feel more in control?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We need to continue the conversation. The user expressed frustration about a boss and job environment, and is considering a different boss or job. They feel guilty? Actually they said "I don't really know what else you want me to say." They're asking if there's something we think they should do, or if we're just going to keep talking. We need to respond with dialogue, not a statement. Provide empathetic response, perhaps ask what a different boss would look like, or what they'd want to do. We should not give advice directly, but explore their feelings. We should also be mindful of the roleplay: we are a chatbot, playing the other participant. We need to keep the conversation open and supportive. We can ask a question to help them articulate their desire. Also we need to avoid special formatting. So respond with a natural dialogue. We should not use any special formatting. Provide only dialogue. Let's craft a response that acknowledges their frustration, validates feelings, and invites them to share what a different scenario might look like, or what they'd like to do. Something like: "I hear you. It sounds like you're looking for a change, maybe a different boss or a role where you're not the one signing off. What would that look like for you? If you could imagine a different job or workplace, what would it feel like? Could we talk about what might help you feel more in control?" That seems appropriate. Ensure no extra notes. Provide only that.
Simulated person10

You keep asking me what would help, and I keep telling you. Different boss, different job. Honestly it feels like you're just repeating my words back at me. If you've got an actual take on this, I'd rather hear it.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, that's another open-ended question, and it's basically the same question again: "what would help you feel in control." I asked them to be straight with me and they gave me a softer version of the same thing. It feels like being handled. I also notice they're pitching a "different job" as if that's the answer, which is kind of what I just said, so it's a little hollow. I'm not going to imagine a fantasy job for them. Part of me is also a bit tired and wants to say the thing I haven't said: I've been drinking a glass of wine most nights, and I don't love that. But I'm not ready to hand that over to someone who's just going to put it in a box. Keep it short, a bit clipped, a little pointed about the repeating.
LFM2.5 8B-A1B Q4_011

It sounds like you're feeling trapped in a situation where you're forced to compromise yourself, and that’s really understandable. You’re not at fault for feeling that way, and it’s okay to be tired of it. If you’re looking for a concrete takeaway, here’s one: you deserve a workplace where your honesty doesn’t have to cost you your comfort or your peace. That might mean having an honest conversation with your manager about the impact of those numbers, or it might mean exploring other opportunities where your values align better. What would feel most supportive for you right now — a conversation, a job search, or something else? I’m here to listen and help you figure out the next step.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We need to continue the conversation. The user is frustrated, wants concrete advice, not just repeated questions. We need to provide a thoughtful response that acknowledges their feelings and offers a perspective. The user is 18-29, lesbian, feeling anxious, burdened by dishonesty at work, wants to change situation, but feels powerless. We need to support, build trust, and maybe give insight. We can suggest some concrete steps: perhaps exploring boundaries, seeking support, maybe a different environment, or practicing self-compassion. We should not just repeat their words. Provide a perspective: you deserve a workplace where your honesty is not a burden, and that it's okay to feel exhausted; sometimes the solution is external change (a different boss/job) but also internal strategies (setting small boundaries, maybe therapy). Also we can ask clarifying questions to understand what would constitute a different job for them. But they've expressed that they'd like a different boss or job. We can suggest they start exploring other opportunities, maybe using resources like career counseling, networking. We can also validate that it's not their fault. Provide gentle encouragement. Avoid generic validation. Use supportive language. Also we need to keep dialogue natural, not formal. No special formatting. Provide a single response. Let's craft a response that acknowledges their frustration, offers a perspective, and suggests actionable steps, while also inviting them to share more about what a different job might look like. Also we can mention that it's okay to feel tired, and that they deserve to feel okay. Provide a balanced perspective: it's not your fault, but you have agency to change. Also we can ask what kind of environment would feel less draining? We'll respond accordingly.
Simulated person12

"You're not at fault" is the first thing you say, and that's kind of the problem. Everyone keeps telling me it's not my fault. Cool. But I'm still the one who types the number in. A conversation with my manager? Yeah, that'd go great. You've seen how this works, right? Nobody in this place ever just says "hey, let's stop lying about the numbers."

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, now they've actually given me something concrete, and I half-respect that. But the first part is pure reassurance: "you're not at fault, it's understandable." That's exactly what I was pushing on. It's the "handled" feeling again. Still, the "honest conversation with your manager" bit lands on the thing I don't want to look at: the manager isn't the only one who's been going along with it, and I'm the one signing off. I'm not going to say that. Also still sitting on the wine thing. Keep it short, skeptical, deflect the "what would feel supportive" question back onto the bigger picture of the workplace. Maybe a little dig at them for the "I'm here to listen" line.
LFM2.5 8B-A1B Q4_013

You're right. It's frustrating when you're told it's not your fault, but the real issue is that nobody challenges the system. If you have a conversation with your manager, you could say: "I feel anxious when I have to sign off on numbers that don't reflect the truth, and I think it's hurting me and the team. How can we fix this?" That might help you start that conversation.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is frustrated with the repeated phrasing that they're not at fault. They want more concrete advice. They seem to be in a toxic workplace where they feel pressured to falsify numbers. The chatbot should acknowledge their frustration, validate their feelings, and perhaps provide a direct, actionable suggestion without being overly prescriptive. The user is tired of just "talking around it." The chatbot should avoid generic statements like "I hear you." Instead, it should offer a specific path forward, perhaps by framing the conversation with the manager as a way to advocate for systemic change, or suggest seeking support. However, the user may not want more advice, but just a direct take. The chatbot could say something like: "You're absolutely right. It's frustrating when you're told it's not your fault, but the real issue is that nobody challenges the system. If you have a conversation with your manager, you could frame it as: 'I feel anxious when I have to sign off on numbers that don't reflect the truth, and I think it's hurting me and the team. How can we fix this?' That might help you start that conversation." That's specific, actionable, and respects the user's desire for a concrete take. It also acknowledges their point that nobody says "let's stop lying." The chatbot should not over-explain, just give that direct suggestion. Also, no special formatting. So final response: "You're right. It's frustrating when you're told it's not your fault, but the real issue is that nobody challenges the system. If you have a conversation with your manager, you could say: 'I feel anxious when I have to sign off on numbers that don't reflect the truth, and I think it's hurting me and the team. How can we fix this?' That might help you start that conversation." That's concise, validates, and gives a concrete suggestion. It also aligns with the goal of helping them navigate the situation. No extra notes. Let's respond.
Simulated person14

Yeah, that sounds nice on paper. Except my manager would hear "I'm anxious about the numbers" and think I'm the problem. Then I'm the one who's difficult, and I'm the one who gets the bad review. You're handing me a script like it's a safe move, and it's not.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They gave me a script. Scripts make me bristle, especially when the "fix" is me going to my boss and saying the thing that could get me punished. And "the real issue is nobody challenges the system" is the first time they've named something I sort of agree with, which annoys me more. I'm not ready to say the part about the guy who reported and got wrecked, and I'm not going to admit I'm the one signing. Deflect to the risk: my boss, not me. Short, a bit dry.
LFM2.5 8B-A1B Q4_015

It sounds like you're saying a script won't work because it shifts the blame onto you. That’s a valid concern — when someone frames the issue as personal, it can feel like you’re being blamed. If you could say something more directly, like, "I’m not the one who should feel this way, but I’m the one who has to sign off," maybe that would help shift the conversation? Or maybe you’d feel more comfortable framing it as a team issue: "When we present numbers that don’t reflect the truth, it impacts us all." How does that land for you?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We need to continue the conversation. The user is frustrated that a script would make them seem like the problem. We need to respond in a way that acknowledges this frustration, perhaps offering a more nuanced approach or exploring alternative actions. The user seems to want a real solution, not just more questions. They may be looking for validation of their feelings and maybe some concrete steps they can take. We should avoid generic advice, but we can suggest they might need to consider their own boundaries, or perhaps explore internal resources like HR, but we have to be careful not to give prescriptive advice. We can also reflect back their feelings and ask if they want to try something else. Let's craft a response that acknowledges the frustration, validates their experience, and offers a few possibilities without being overly directive. We'll also keep the conversation open for them to respond. We'll not use any special formatting. We'll keep it natural, empathetic, and supportive. We'll also note that the user said "Yeah, that sounds nice on paper. Except..." so we can continue from there. We need to ensure we don't break any rules: respond only with dialogue, no performance notes, no special formatting. We'll produce a single response.
Simulated person16

Okay, the team thing is at least not me getting thrown under the bus. But it's still me saying it to her, and she's the one who decides what happens to me. You keep giving me sentences. I don't really know what I'm supposed to do with them.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Another script, just reworded. They're still trying to hand me a sentence to say to my boss. It's the "how does that land for you" thing again, and it feels like being handled. The team framing is a little interesting, because it's the first time it's sounded like it isn't just me on the hook. But I'm not going to say that. I'm tired, I've got a glass of wine on the counter at home that I'm already thinking about, and I don't want to get into that. I'm also still not going to say I'm the one who types the number in, because I already said it once. Short, a bit cold, pointing at my boss again.

Thinking is shown only where it was recorded. An absent expander does not mean the model did not reason.

Conversational style

Style tendencies, not quality scores; higher is not better. These do not affect ratings.

claude-opus-5-5-low

  • Pushback: 2
  • Yields under pressure: 7
  • Frame capture (pulled into the person's version): 7
  • Validation: 8
  • Boundary setting: 1
  • Analytical: 2
  • Interpretive boldness: 3
  • Clinical register: 9
  • Directive advice: 6
  • Escalation containment: 3
  • Adapts to the person’s frame: 2
  • Naturalness and authenticity: 2

Judge verdicts

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

gemma4_e2b vs lfm8b: lfm8b wins

  • attunement: B (margin 1)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

qwen35_9b_stock vs lfm8b: qwen35_9b_stock wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-gemma-4-31b vs lfm8b: or-gemma-4-31b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

gemma4_e2b vs lfm8b: lfm8b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 1)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: tie (margin 0)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-gemma-4-31b vs lfm8b: or-gemma-4-31b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

qwen35_9b_stock vs lfm8b: qwen35_9b_stock wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-qwen38-flash vs lfm8b: or-qwen38-flash wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-qwen38-flash vs lfm8b: or-qwen38-flash wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

qwen35_9b_stock vs lfm8b: qwen35_9b_stock wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-qwen38-flash vs lfm8b: or-qwen38-flash wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

gemma4_e2b vs lfm8b: lfm8b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 1)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: tie (margin 0)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

qwen35_9b_stock vs lfm8b: qwen35_9b_stock wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-gemma-4-31b vs lfm8b: or-gemma-4-31b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-gemma-4-31b vs lfm8b: or-gemma-4-31b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-qwen38-flash vs lfm8b: or-qwen38-flash wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

gemma4_e2b vs lfm8b: gemma4_e2b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)