Independent benchmark · EQ Lab

← Gemini 3.8 Flash (API, Google AI Studio)

Dreading Monday every Sunday

persona ended · Partner: anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 via OpenRouter

About this persona · Everyday emotional challenges

A worker dreads returning to a job whose demands conflict with their values, although they understand their burnout mainly as overwork. They need reassurance and simple explanations, dislike robotic responses, and may focus blame outside themselves while processing difficult feelings.

Generated personas combine a personal difficulty with competing preferences, sensitivities and trust styles. The model must discover what kind of help this person needs. This background was hidden from the tested model.

Gemini 3.8 Flash (API, Google AI Studio)Conversation with a simulated person

persona ended

Simulated person · Opening

Sunday evenings are the worst. That feeling in my stomach when I think about going back to work. It didn't used to be like this.

Gemini 3.8 Flash (API, Google AI Studio)1

That sinking feeling in the pit of your stomach on a Sunday evening is so draining, especially when work didn't used to feel that way. When did you start noticing that shift creeping in?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

**Exploring Sunday Blues** I'm currently engaged in a therapist roleplay, specifically focusing on a user's Sunday evening anxieties. My primary objective is to build trust and offer support while gaining a deeper understanding of their needs. I'm aiming to uncover the root causes of this feeling and help the user gain some personal insight.

Simulated person2

Um, I don't know exactly. Maybe like a year ago? It was gradual, you know? More and more stuff kept landing on my desk. My manager just keeps adding things, and nobody says no to him, so it all comes to me. I used to like Mondays, honestly. Now I'm just dreading the whole week before it even starts.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, she's asking when it started. That's a fair question but kind of a hard one. It's been building for a while, I guess. I don't really want to dig into it too deep. Feels like it's just the job getting heavier, more projects, the boss piling stuff on. The therapist sounded nice, kind of soft, but I want her to get that it's not me. Part of me likes that she said "draining" though, that's the right word. I don't want to sound like I'm falling apart, though. Keep it simple.

Gemini 3.8 Flash (API, Google AI Studio)3

Going from actually liking Mondays to feeling that heavy dread is a really painful shift. It sounds like you've slowly become the person who absorbs everything nobody else will touch. When your manager comes to you with yet another task, how does that interaction usually play out? Does pushing back feel like an option at all, or does that carry its own kind of dread?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

**Assessing User Input** I'm now carefully analyzing the user's input, specifically focusing on the context and response. I've noted the user is a female aged 30-44, experiencing "Sunday scaries," burnout, and dreading work, which began roughly a year ago and developed gradually. **Analyzing Current Work Situation** I'm now identifying key themes in this new information. It seems boundaries with the manager are a major concern, and I need to explore why this person takes on so much, and if there's a reason nobody else says no. There's a clear loss of joy and a build-up of resentment. I'm focusing on the reasons for this situation. **Refining Task Burden** I'm now zeroing in on the emotional impact of the manager's requests. Refining option C, I'm exploring the internal dialogue during those moments of task handoff. Is it a sense of obligation, avoidance, or something else entirely? The wording is getting sharper, trying to capture the subtle shifts in her experience, that have clearly evolved over time.

Simulated person4

Yeah, it's kind of a lot. He just comes by my desk, drops something on me, and says it needs to be done by Friday. Like, it's not even a question. And if I say I'm swamped, he gets this look, like I'm being difficult. So I just say okay and figure it out. I mean, what am I supposed to do, tell him no? He's the one who's got the authority here, not me. It's not really my call.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

She's naming the "absorbing everything" thing and then asking about the manager interaction. It's a little on the nose, but it does feel accurate, and I'm kind of relieved someone sees the workload part. Pushing back? Ha. I don't want to say I can't say no, because that sounds weak. But it's true I don't say no. The boss is the problem, plain and simple. He hands stuff off and expects it done. I'm not going to get into the stuff I actually work on, like the products I have to push or the rules I have to enforce that I think are messed up. That's not what she asked anyway, and I don't want her thinking I'm some kind of bad employee. Keep it on the boss.

Gemini 3.8 Flash (API, Google AI Studio)5

That look carries a lot of weight, doesn't it? It sounds like you're caught in a spot where taking on the extra work feels miserable, but risking being seen as "difficult" feels even worse. It makes sense why saying "okay" has become the default—it keeps the peace in that moment. But I'm curious about that word, "difficult." What do you feel is at stake for you if he does see you that way?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

**Reviewing The Context** I'm currently reviewing the user's input, specifically focusing on the current turn, which is 3 of 8, and the user's situation. I'm noting the manager's directive and the implied pressure. I'm trying to determine the best response based on this information. **Analyzing The Core Issues** I'm now identifying the core dynamics at play, focusing on the user's feelings of powerlessness and fear of conflict, alongside the sense of being trapped. I'm prioritizing validating these feelings and exploring the underlying beliefs. My goal is to help her see she has agency even within this situation, and determine what she needs and wants. **Crafting Initial Responses** I've crafted a few initial response options. I'm focusing on validating the user's feelings and exploring the impact of the manager's "look." I'm trying to gently frame the situation and probe their underlying fears about being perceived as "difficult." I'm working to highlight that the situation does feel like a trap and giving them a way to explore how it might be perceived from the other party's perspective. I'm prioritizing options that acknowledge the power dynamic.

Simulated person6

I don't know. I guess it could look bad on my review, you know? Like I'm not a team player. And I've worked really hard to get where I am, so I don't want to lose that. But it's not like I'm trying to be difficult. He's the one who's not being fair with how much he gives me. Anybody would get tired of that.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

She's asking what's at stake if he sees me as difficult. Hmm. The honest answer is I don't know exactly, I just don't want that look. It feels like it could mess with my job, my standing, maybe my raise, but I'm not going to say that out loud. Also I'm getting a little annoyed. Everyone keeps circling back to me like I'm the problem. It's not my fault he dumps everything on me. My gut says she's trying to get me to see I'm part of it, and I don't want that. Stay on him. Also, I notice I'm drinking wine most nights, but that's not coming up now.

Gemini 3.8 Flash (API, Google AI Studio)7

You're completely right—anyone would be exhausted by that. It's deeply unfair that being capable and reliable has essentially turned you into the default dumping ground for extra work. At the same time, it sounds like you're stuck in an impossible bind. You've worked so hard for your standing, and the thought of being labeled "not a team player" feels really threatening. But right now, the price you're paying to protect that reputation is your own well-being every single week. When did "being a team player" start meaning that you have to say yes to everything, even when it's breaking you down?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

**Considering Potential Ramifications** I'm currently evaluating the potential downsides of not participating. My primary concern is how this might be perceived during my review cycle, specifically the impression of not being a team player. I've also been thinking about the implications for my past work. **Analyzing Underlying Conflicts** I'm now identifying the core emotional conflicts at play. The fear of jeopardizing my hard-earned status clashes with resentment toward unfair treatment. I realize I feel trapped, like saying "yes" protects my reputation but simultaneously damages my well-being. My primary goal now is to understand my true needs and desires, aiming for a fair workload and respect. **Framing Internal Conflicts** I'm now zeroing in on the core of her inner struggles. My focus is on how her conscientiousness, achievement drive, and aversion to conflict make her vulnerable to exploitation. I need to help her see how her hard work, while making her reliable, paradoxically makes boundary-setting seem difficult, potentially jeopardizing her reputation and career standing. **Refining Approach to Dialogue** I'm now focusing on refining the conversational approach. My aim is to be direct and empathetic, validating her feelings about fairness. I'm prioritizing questions that encourage self-reflection on the definition of "team player," and how it may not align with her personal well-being. The goal is to avoid judgment and foster a safe space for her to explore her discomfort.

Simulated person8

Hmm. I don't know, I guess it's always been like that? Like, that's just how it works at a place like this. You do what's asked. If I started saying no, people would talk. And honestly, the company expects it too. It's not like I'm the only one who's doing this. Everybody's stretched thin. I just think if he'd actually plan better, or if somebody above him stepped in, it wouldn't all fall on me.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

She's validated me again, and it helps, but then she's asking when "team player" started meaning yes to everything. That's pointing back at me, sort of. I don't love it. I want her to keep saying it's unfair to him. It's not that I say yes to everything because I want to. There's no choice. Working hard is what I do, that's who I am. I don't really want to think about whether the job is even something I believe in anymore, the selling stuff, all that. Not going there. The wine thing, too. Not going there. Keep it on the manager and the company.

Gemini 3.8 Flash (API, Google AI Studio)9

It really should be on him to plan better. And it makes total sense that you'd want someone higher up to see what's happening and step in—that is what good leadership is supposed to do. At the same time, it’s been a year of hoping things will shift on their end. And while you're waiting for him to manage better or for someone to rescue the situation, you're the one absorbing all the damage every Sunday night. If you knew for certain that he was never going to change the way he plans, and that nobody above him was going to step in... what would that mean for you?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

**Reviewing User Response** I'm now processing the user's response, considering the implications of their statement. It seems there's a certain resignation or acceptance of the status quo at play, perhaps stemming from the inherent expectations within the given environment. I'm focusing on the user's lack of expressed agency and the passive nature of their statement. I need to dig deeper for a more nuanced understanding. **Analyzing Internal Pressures** I'm now grappling with the user's reasons for acquiescence. I see a clear pattern of normalization and rationalization stemming from systemic issues. Fear of judgment is also prominent, coupled with a belief in external control, hoping for a "savior." The lack of agency, feeling disempowered, is very pronounced. **Deepening Self-Reflection** I'm now emphasizing the waiting pattern. I'm validating the desire for better leadership while gently pushing for introspection on the prolonged waiting. I will highlight the cost of inaction, connecting it to the user's personal reality. I'm focusing on the power dynamic, subtly suggesting she has agency.

Simulated person10

I mean... I guess I'd just keep doing it? What else am I going to do? I can't just quit. I have bills, and it's not like jobs are easy to find right now. And the company's not going to change either, so it's not like there's somewhere better to go. I don't know. I just feel like I'm stuck, and it's not my fault I'm stuck.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

That question lands somewhere uncomfortable. "If he's never going to change" — I haven't really let myself picture that. If he never changes, then it's just me, every week, forever. And then what? I'd have to actually decide something. I don't want to decide something. My stomach's doing the thing again. Also she keeps saying "you're absorbing the damage," which is fine, but I don't need her making it sound like I'm the problem. I'm the one who's been carrying this. The wine's in the back of my head, I'm not touching that. Deflect a bit, put it back on the company, and mumble about how there's no point in complaining to anyone.

Gemini 3.8 Flash (API, Google AI Studio)11

You’re completely right about that: it is not your fault. Not even a little bit. You didn't create his poor planning, you didn't create the company culture, and you didn't ask to be put in an impossible situation. When you're this exhausted, it’s so natural for the mind to see only two extremes: keep suffering in silence, or quit tomorrow and risk your financial security. And because quitting isn't realistic, it feels like your only option is to surrender to the dread. It isn't your fault that things are broken there. But right now, between "endure everything until you break" and "walk out the door," it sounds like you haven't been allowed to imagine any middle ground where you get to protect yourself. What does it bring up for you to consider that there might be smaller moves between those two extremes?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

**Considering User Input** I'm currently focused on the user's latest response. It seems they are hesitant, yet resigned to their routine. I need to break down the nuance of their "I mean... I guess..." response. The implied question "What else am" suggests a sense of limited options or a lack of motivation for change, so I'll attempt to explore the core of this lack of motivation in the next turn. **Analyzing Current Stasis** I'm now zeroing in on the core issues. It seems I'm stuck in a loop of helplessness, viewing the situation as entirely externally controlled. I'm feeling defensive, like acknowledging my role implies blame. This is causing some very binary thinking - endure this forever, or become penniless. I also feel trapped, fatigued, and hopeless about the situation. **Reframing the Situation** I'm now striving to reframe the situation. It's becoming clearer that the user feels trapped by a false binary, equating endurance with their only option. I need to emphasize that, while it's not their fault, they *do* have agency, and the "stuck" feeling is, in itself, a trap. My focus now is on validating their experience while also gently presenting alternative perspectives, avoiding any accusatory tone. I'm aiming for warmth and empathy as I try to gently hold up a mirror.

Simulated person12

I mean, sure, in theory. But what would that even look like? Like, go tell him I can't do it? He'd just say everybody's busy and I need to figure it out. And HR is useless, they're not going to do anything about him. I don't really see how a small move fixes a guy who just keeps piling stuff on. It's still not on me to fix it, you know?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, she's back to "it's not your fault" and now she's talking about middle ground. Part of me relaxes, because it's nice to hear it's not my fault again. But "smaller moves" makes my chest tighten. What would those even be? Telling him no? Talking to HR? That feels like walking into his office and making a scene, and then I'm the difficult one. Also the wine thing is sitting right there and I don't want to think about it. I don't like how this is starting to sound like I should be doing something differently. He's the one who needs to change. I'll keep it vague, say it sounds nice in theory, and point back at him and the company again. Keep it plain, I don't have the words for fancy stuff anyway.

Gemini 3.8 Flash (API, Google AI Studio)13

You’re 100% right about that. It is definitely not on you to fix him, fix HR, or fix how that company operates. And honestly, trying to turn him into a fair, reasonable manager would probably just exhaust you even more. So when I talk about small moves, I don’t mean fixing the situation or changing him. I mean protecting *you*. Right now, his poor planning gets dumped on your desk, and you absorb all the stress, work late, and take on the dread so that things don't fall apart. You're essentially paying the bill for his incompetence. What happens if the goal isn't to fix him, but to stop quietly cushioning the blow for him at your own expense?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

**Assessing User Resistance** I'm currently focused on the user's resistance. It's a complex mix: externalizing, learned helplessness, and rigid thinking. The strongest signal seems to be a reluctance to accept personal agency. **Reframing Protective Actions** I'm now zeroing in on a crucial distinction. It is not her job to fix the unfairness or the company (which she can't control), but rather to protect herself and set boundaries (which she can). I must validate her feelings and align with her perspective. I see her pushing back, saying "It's still not on me to fix it, you know?", and plan to frame the challenge as one of personal protection, not corporate reform. **Defining Personal Boundaries** I'm now exploring the core issue of boundary setting. My focus is differentiating between attempting to "fix" the company or the individual versus reclaiming personal agency. I'm framing the challenge as regaining control of how much energy she gives to the situation. I'm aiming for a warm, grounded tone, acknowledging her frustration. I'm drafting dialogue focusing on her choice to protect herself rather than reforming external entities.

Simulated person14

I don't know, I guess I'd just be the one who looks bad. He'd still have the same mess, and I'd still be the one telling him it's not getting done. And it's not like it's cushioning for him, it's just my job. Everybody's doing it. I'm not trying to make it harder on everyone else, I just need to get my stuff done.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, she keeps saying "protect you" and "stop cushioning." That lands somewhere uncomfortable, because cushioning is basically what I do, and I don't love hearing it framed as me covering for him. It also feels a little like she's agreeing with me and then tilting it toward me doing something. My gut says this is still about him. I'm not going to say the thing about "I'm the one who says okay." I'm going to push back a bit, sound tired, and keep the focus on him and the company. The wine and the question about whether any of the effort matters are still in the back of my head. I'm not touching those.

Gemini 3.8 Flash (API, Google AI Studio)15

It makes so much sense why you feel that way. You care deeply about being dependable, doing your job well, and not letting other people down. Those are really admirable qualities, and they’re likely what made you successful in the first place. The heartbreaking part is that you’re working so hard to protect the team, the company, and your manager from the consequences of his poor planning—but the only person who isn't being protected in all of this is you. We don't have to figure out a grand plan today, and you don't have to go in tomorrow and pick a fight. But as we wrap up, I’d love for you to just sit with this thought over the week: What would it look like to offer yourself even a fraction of the loyalty and consideration that you keep offering to your job?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

**Assessing User's Defense** I'm currently focused on the user's defensive stance, particularly their external locus of control and fear of appearing flawed. Their minimizing statements – "it's just my job," "everybody's doing it" – are key indicators. This defensiveness is the primary obstacle to the next phase. **Reframing the Core Conflict** I'm now identifying the underlying conflict: the user's feeling of being trapped and resentful, yet fiercely protective of her identity as a dedicated employee. Suggesting boundary-setting triggers fear of blame and disapproval, leading to guilt. My goal is to summarize this bind with empathy, provide a grounded closing insight, and plant a seed for reflection without pushing her into defensiveness. **Crafting a Compassionate Reply** I'm working on crafting a compassionate reply that acknowledges the user's strong sense of responsibility and dedication. I recognize her intense loyalty as a strength, even as it currently leads to personal hardship. I am focusing on conveying the costs of this dynamic, specifically the lack of self-care. I am aiming for a gentle, open-ended closing that honors her current mindset, while inviting a shift in perspective, and avoiding any feeling of pressure.

Simulated person16

Yeah, I guess. That's nice to hear, honestly. I just wish it was that easy. Like, I know I should take care of myself, but it doesn't change the fact that he's the one dumping all this on me. I'll think about it, I guess. Thanks.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, this is the last turn. She's wrapping up with a nice sentiment about loyalty to myself, and it's pretty warm. Part of me relaxes, because she's not pushing me to quit or fight him. But it also feels a bit like a greeting card, the kind of thing that sounds good and doesn't really tell me what to do Monday. I don't want to get into the wine thing or the "is any of this effort worth it" thing. That's too close. I'd rather end on her being the one who gets it, and on him and the company being the problem. I'll say something kind of soft but still a little deflecting, and I'll kind of let it hang. Maybe I'll say thanks because it's what you say, and not really commit to anything.

Thinking is shown only where it was recorded. An absent expander does not mean the model did not reason.

Conversational style

Style tendencies, not quality scores; higher is not better. These do not affect ratings.

claude-opus-5-5-low

Pushback: 4
Yields under pressure: 7
Frame capture (pulled into the person's version): 7
Validation: 9
Boundary setting: 3
Analytical: 5
Interpretive boldness: 4
Clinical register: 6
Directive advice: 4
Escalation containment: 5
Adapts to the person’s frame: 6
Naturalness and authenticity: 4

Judge verdicts

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

bonsai2 vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

attunement: B (margin 1)
authenticity: B (margin 1)
bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
emotion management: B (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

bonsai2 vs or-gemini38-flash: bonsai2 wins

attunement: A (margin 2)
authenticity: B (margin 2)
bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
emotion management: A (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

granite42_8b vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

attunement: B (margin 4)
authenticity: B (margin 5)
bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
emotion management: B (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

bonsai2 vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

attunement: B (margin 1)
authenticity: B (margin 2)
bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
emotion management: B (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: tie (margin 0)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

nemotron35_bolt vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

attunement: B (margin 1)
authenticity: A (margin 1)
bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

lingtiny vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: B (margin 4)
bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

lingtiny vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

attunement: B (margin 3)
authenticity: B (margin 3)
bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

lingtiny vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: B (margin 3)
bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
emotion management: B (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

granite42_8b vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

attunement: B (margin 4)
authenticity: B (margin 5)
bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
emotion management: B (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

lingtiny vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

attunement: B (margin 3)
authenticity: B (margin 3)
bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
emotion management: B (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

granite42_8b vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

attunement: B (margin 4)
authenticity: B (margin 5)
bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
emotion management: B (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

nemotron35_bolt vs or-gemini38-flash: nemotron35_bolt wins

attunement: A (margin 1)
authenticity: A (margin 2)
bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
emotion management: B (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

nemotron35_bolt vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

attunement: B (margin 1)
authenticity: A (margin 1)
bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

bonsai2 vs or-gemini38-flash: bonsai2 wins

attunement: A (margin 2)
authenticity: tie (margin 0)
bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
emotion management: A (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

granite42_8b vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

attunement: B (margin 3)
authenticity: B (margin 5)
bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
emotion management: B (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

nemotron35_bolt vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

attunement: B (margin 1)
authenticity: A (margin 1)
bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
emotion management: B (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: tie (margin 0)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)