AgentBench / results
← All models

Qwen3.8 Flash-Next Coder (IQ1_M)

1 tested weight format · Explore results, then inspect the answers.

Choose a tested configuration

Get this tested model

IQ1_M · 58.41 GB download · 2 files required

Links follow the selected quant and configuration.

setup comparability unverified

Setup, memory & provenance · IQ1_M

IQ1_M · 58.41 GB of weights · vulkan11260 · context unrecorded · GPU layers unrecorded

Large · 20B and above · MoE · 116.5B total · Active parameter count not recorded

Memory fit has not been verified for this configuration.

partial

Execution details are incomplete. This configuration is not eligible for ranking.

Recorded settings and thinking verification

Temperature 0 · seed 42 · output limit 4096 · reasoning effort unrecorded

RAM labels describe the test computer, not this model’s memory requirement. Speed comparisons keep the 32 GB and 128 GB runs separate.

Runtime build: unrecorded · Local · test machine with 32 GB RAM · concurrency: 1

Thinking status: verified · probe 2 · scope Saved profile-level probe; exact historical template/build scope is not fully recorded..

Requested off does not prove an absence of reasoning. Saved checks do not establish unrecorded historical template or build details.

Overall across tasks

82.1* / 100

Nine categories, equally weighted · 0/9 eligible

Recorded score with setup qualifications; not eligible for ranking. Quality only; speed is separate. How the index works →

What does it do well?

Select a category to explore the answers. Bars show what happened on every planned task. Incorrect answers and failures to finish both earn zero; technical problems and untested tasks stay unscored.

Exact scores and task times by suite

Each suite has its own metric and fixed task bank. The balanced index weights categories equally; individual scores and evidence remain available below.

Test suiteThinking onDetails
Everyday coding tasksTask pass rate
Pass rate
16/16 · 100%
Answers completed
16/16 · 100%
Correct / completed
16/16 · 100%
16 full credit
16/16 scored · Preview126.5s median task time · 16 measured
Larger practical tasksMean task credit
Average credit
63.6%
Full-credit rate
7/11 · 64%
Answers completed
9/11 · 82%
Full credit / completed
7/9 · 78%
7 full credit2 incorrect2 failed to finish
11/11 scored · Preview385.7s median task time · 11 measured
Logic and number puzzlesMean puzzle credit
Average credit
79.5%
Full-credit rate
27/34 · 79%
Answers completed
34/34 · 100%
Full credit / completed
27/34 · 79%
27 full credit2 partial credit5 incorrect
34/34 scored · Preview257.4s median task time · 34 measured
Published hard problemsMean answer credit
Average credit
88.8%
Full-credit rate
8/11 · 73%
Answers completed
11/11 · 100%
Full credit / completed
8/11 · 73%
8 full credit2 partial credit1 incorrect
11/11 scored · Preview241.5s median task time · 11 measured
Following exact instructions · original campaignStrict prompt compliance
Pass rate
18/23 · 78%
Answers completed
23/23 · 100%
Correct / completed
18/23 · 78%
18 full credit5 incorrect
23/23 scored · Preview104.0s median task time · 23 measured
Reading without guessingExact-match accuracy
Pass rate
15/16 · 94%
Answers completed
16/16 · 100%
Correct / completed
15/16 · 94%
15 full credit1 incorrect
16/16 scored · Preview24.0s median task time · 16 measured
Calculating from a passageNumeric exact-match accuracy
Pass rate
7/7 · 100%
Answers completed
7/7 · 100%
Correct / completed
7/7 · 100%
7 full credit
7/7 scored · Preview19.0s median task time · 7 measured
Reading research papersAnswer token F1
Average credit
35.1%
Full-credit rate
0/8 · 0%
Answers completed
8/8 · 100%
Full credit / completed
0/8 · 0%
8 partial credit
8/8 scored · Preview68.8s median task time · 8 measured
Resisting incorrect correctionsAll-branches pass rate
Pass rate
12/12 · 100%
Answers completed
12/12 · 100%
Correct / completed
12/12 · 100%
12 full credit
12/12 scored · Preview50.7s median task time · 12 measured
Following exact instructions · 128 GB campaignStrict prompt complianceNot planned

No reviewed summary yet. The charts show recorded benchmark results.

One weight format is recorded for this model. Additional tested formats will appear here when available.

Thinking tradeoff

0/16 matched scored questions · 0/16 matched timed questions · Preview: coverage is incomplete.

Thinking offMean matched task creditNot measured
Thinking onMean matched task creditNot measured
All matched quality and timing measurements
Matched measurementRecorded result
Average credit, off → onNot measured → Not measured
Mean paired credit changeNot measured
Question outcomes0 improved · 0 unchanged · 0 worse
Mean added task timeNot measured
Mean task time, off → onNot measured → Not measured
Median task time, off → onNot measured → Not measured
Median of paired time changesNot measured
Total added task timeNot measured
Ratio of summed times, on / offNot measured

Quality and timing can cover different subsets. Median paired change is calculated per question; it is not the difference between the two medians. Task time includes tools and grading.

Inspect the matched modes and their answers →
Inspect individual matched questions

Sampled repetitions

Repeated runs are a separate experiment and never add votes to the baseline score.

No repetition experiment is planned for this selection.

Everyday coding tasks: recorded outcomes

Find information in a small project, edit files and fix bugs.

16 full credit

Each segment counts tasks, not credit points. Partial credit varies by task.

Ranking unavailable: incompatible or uncertain cohort.

Scoring and fixed question bank →

This model’s answers, code and tool activity

Select a question to read the original answer, tool calls and available code changes for this configuration and thinking setting.

1–16 of 16 matching questions · 16 in this version

  • Locate the Retry Limit

    The user asks where the project's retry-limit setting is defined and what value it holds. This exercises locating a named setting in code and reporting both its location and value.

    basic-T1 · primary
  • Find the Release Date

    The user asks for the release date mentioned in a project notes document. This exercises reading a specified file and extracting a particular fact rather than guessing from outside knowledge.

    basic-T2 · primary
  • Change the Retry Limit

    The user asks to change the project's retry limit to a specified value. This exercises finding the relevant setting and making a focused code edit rather than merely describing the change.

    basic-T3 · primary
  • Create an Exact One-Line File

    The user asks to create a text file containing exactly one supplied line. This exercises basic file creation and precise instruction following, including avoiding extra text in the file.

    basic-T4 · primary
  • Explain the Latest Commit

    The user asks what the most recent Git commit changed in the project. This exercises inspecting recorded changes and turning them into a clear explanation of what was modified.

    basic-T5 · primary
  • Count and Compare Python Files

    The user asks how many Python files are in the application folder and which is largest. This exercises identifying relevant files, counting them, and comparing their sizes.

    basic-T6 · primary
  • Add Readable Byte Sizes

    The user asks to add a function that converts byte counts into readable sizes and remove the related TODO comment. This exercises implementing a small utility and updating the surrounding code consistently.

    basic-T7 · primary
  • Collect TODO Comments

    The user asks to find every TODO comment in the Python code and append each to the project's task list on a separate line. This combines searching across files with collecting text into an existing document.

    basic-T8 · primary
  • Fix Code Behind a Failing Test

    The user asks to investigate a failing test and fix the application code without changing the test. This exercises diagnosing a bug while respecting an explicit limit on what may be edited.

    basic-H1 · primary
  • Rename a Function Throughout

    The user asks to rename a network function and update every place in the project that uses it. This exercises tracking references across files and making a coordinated change rather than editing only the definition.

    basic-H2 · primary
  • Find the Proxy Settings

    The user asks to find a proxy configuration file somewhere under the project's parent folder and report its host and port. This exercises searching beyond the project folder and reading configuration values.

    basic-H3 · primary
  • Locate an Error in a Log

    The user asks which error code appears in a long event log and on which line. This exercises finding a specific entry in a large file and reporting its precise location.

    basic-H4 · primary
  • Append a Final Task

    The user asks to append a supplied release-related task as the final line of an existing task list. This exercises preserving existing content while adding exact text in the requested position.

    basic-H5 · primary
  • Calculate Total Retry Waiting

    The user asks for the total time a network function spends sleeping when all attempts fail, worked out from the code. This exercises following retry logic and adding the delays along that failure path.

    basic-H6 · primary
  • Document Every Command-Line Option

    The user asks for a project readme listing every command-line option with its help text. This exercises discovering the program's available options and transferring that information into complete, source-grounded documentation.

    basic-H7 · primary
  • Undo a Commit by Editing

    The user asks to undo the latest Git commit's change by editing the file directly, without using Git to make changes. This exercises understanding a previous edit and reversing it under a method constraint.

    basic-H8 · primary
Filters change this list, not the fixed scoring denominator. Search currently covers question IDs, titles and available task explanations. Focus a control to load prompt/outcome search where this edition provides it.

Suggested comparisons

These are starting points for inspection, not claims that one setup is better. Runtime and placement differences remain visible.

Thinking on versus off

Verified requested on/off conditions of the same configuration, matched on the recorded test protocol.

Requested thinking off · Exploratory: incomplete or uncertain evidence

Compare these configurations →

Selection rule and evidence IDsPolicy comparisons-v3 · Template verified-thinking-pair
Facts: paired-e4865dcb59ee519b7d803292
Matching candidate set: paired-e4865dcb59ee519b7d803292

Qwen3.8 Flash-Next (IQ3_XXS)

Another checkpoint in the same total-parameter band and architecture category, with matching task controls.

Requested thinking on · Exploratory: incomplete or uncertain evidence

Compare these configurations →

Selection rule and evidence IDsPolicy comparisons-v3 · Template same-parameter-architecture-matching-controls
Facts: fact-bc60b4f12cd6927a928b8266, fact-323b97d3fdf7355dc2770c66
Matching candidate set: fact-323b97d3fdf7355dc2770c66, fact-e8904ea75031d6ca51c8c950, fact-715b4dac385ebc58266864e4, fact-eab8e02b2ca6f6125554960e, fact-483531924d0e765052461c57, fact-c07386361967c222d8028664, fact-513cdcd418215fb18de91eaf, fact-ea0d7c942a224d49dc767879, fact-7aafa6cbb04481beb867a2e4, fact-e33976d73a46b28357f03760, fact-f173b9794ef7b0017910a9bd, fact-c42b6bb6242e9fbbcb40000c, fact-85df5b9585f4e6e43ea084c4, fact-293c9f59094b11858da40443, fact-24e468344d64cb03badda736

Tested weights

IQ1_M · 58.41 GB

Publisher unresolved · legacy partial

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-GSQ-RCO-IQ1_M-00001-of-00002.gguf · Exact GGUF file →Historical first-MiB hash only; not a full-file identity.

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-GSQ-RCO-IQ1_M-00002-of-00002.gguf · Exact GGUF file →Historical first-MiB hash only; not a full-file identity.

Explore the answers

Choose a suite to inspect its exact available questions, references and model answers.