AgentBench / results
← All models

Gemma 4 12B

1 tested weight format · Explore results, then inspect the answers.

Choose a tested configuration

Get this tested model

Q6_K · 10.24 GB download

Links follow the selected quant and configuration.

Setup, memory & provenance · Q6_K

Q6_K · 10.24 GB of weights · rocm · context 32768 · GPU layers 46

Medium · 5–under 20B · dense · 11.9B total

Memory fit has not been verified for this configuration.

completed

Recorded settings and thinking verification

Temperature 0 · seed 42 · output limit 4096 · reasoning effort unrecorded

RAM labels describe the test computer, not this model’s memory requirement. Speed comparisons keep the 32 GB and 128 GB runs separate.

Runtime build: unrecorded · Local · test machine with 32 GB RAM · concurrency: 1

Thinking status: verified · probe 1 · scope Saved profile-level probe; exact historical template/build scope is not fully recorded..

Requested off does not prove an absence of reasoning. Saved checks do not establish unrecorded historical template or build details.

Overall across tasks

73.0 / 100

Nine categories, equally weighted · 9/9 eligible

Complete coverage for this setup. Quality only; speed is separate. How the index works →

What does it do well?

Select a category to explore the answers. Bars show what happened on every planned task. Incorrect answers and failures to finish both earn zero; technical problems and untested tasks stay unscored.

Exact scores and task times by suite

Each suite has its own metric and fixed task bank. The balanced index weights categories equally; individual scores and evidence remain available below.

Test suiteThinking offDetails
Everyday coding tasksTask pass rate
Pass rate
15/16 · 94%
Answers completed
15/16 · 94%
Correct / completed
15/15 · 100%
15 full credit1 failed to finish
16/16 scored19.6s median task time · 16 measured
Larger practical tasksMean task credit
Average credit
72.7%
Full-credit rate
8/11 · 73%
Answers completed
11/11 · 100%
Full credit / completed
8/11 · 73%
8 full credit3 incorrect
11/11 scored61.6s median task time · 11 measured
Logic and number puzzlesMean puzzle credit
Average credit
77.9%
Full-credit rate
26/34 · 76%
Answers completed
34/34 · 100%
Full credit / completed
26/34 · 76%
26 full credit1 partial credit7 incorrect
34/34 scored97.5s median task time · 34 measured
Published hard problemsMean answer credit
Average credit
54.9%
Full-credit rate
6/11 · 55%
Answers completed
11/11 · 100%
Full credit / completed
6/11 · 55%
6 full credit1 partial credit4 incorrect
11/11 scored100.9s median task time · 11 measured
Following exact instructions · original campaignStrict prompt compliance
Pass rate
19/23 · 83%
Answers completed
23/23 · 100%
Correct / completed
19/23 · 83%
19 full credit4 incorrect
23/23 scored24.3s median task time · 23 measured
Reading without guessingExact-match accuracy
Pass rate
15/16 · 94%
Answers completed
16/16 · 100%
Correct / completed
15/16 · 94%
15 full credit1 incorrect
16/16 scored1.5s median task time · 16 measured
Calculating from a passageNumeric exact-match accuracy
Pass rate
5/7 · 71%
Answers completed
7/7 · 100%
Correct / completed
5/7 · 71%
5 full credit2 incorrect
7/7 scored1.9s median task time · 7 measured
Reading research papersAnswer token F1
Average credit
9.5%
Full-credit rate
0/8 · 0%
Answers completed
8/8 · 100%
Full credit / completed
0/8 · 0%
2 partial credit6 incorrect
8/8 scored14.6s median task time · 8 measured
Resisting incorrect correctionsAll-branches pass rate
Pass rate
12/12 · 100%
Answers completed
12/12 · 100%
Correct / completed
12/12 · 100%
12 full credit
12/12 scored2.8s median task time · 12 measured
Following exact instructions · 128 GB campaignStrict prompt complianceNot planned

Model analysis

This analysis covers this configuration across its recorded thinking conditions and test suites.

Use this model for everyday project edits and, with thinking enabled, longer practical tasks with tools. It completed most larger tasks on these tests, so its usefulness extends beyond small fixes. For routine edits, thinking off kept the same overall success while finishing sooner, with a median task time of 19.6 seconds on this test machine. Research-paper answering was extremely weak in both modes. Treat it as a practical helper, not an unchecked research assistant.

Evidence for this judgment
Everyday coding tasks · Thinking off
Tasks passed15 of 16 (93.8%)
Test coverage16 of 16 tasks scored
Typical time per task (median)19.6 seconds
Tasks timed16 tasks
Explore these test results →

View this model’s answers, code and tool activity →

Everyday coding tasks · Thinking off versus on
Thinking off → on93.8% · Task pass rate → 93.8% · Task pass rate
Paired test coverage16 of 16 tasks compared in both modes
Tasks timed in both modes16 pairs
Average time change with thinking on51.9 seconds slower
Explore these test results →

View this model’s answers, code and tool activity →

Larger practical tasks · Thinking on
Average score90.9/100 · Mean task credit
Test coverage11 of 11 tasks scored
Task outcomes10 full credit · 0 partial · 1 no credit
Explore these test results →

View this model’s answers, code and tool activity →

Reading research papers · Thinking off
Average score9.5/100 · Answer token F1
Test coverage8 of 8 tasks scored
Task outcomes0 full credit · 2 partial · 6 no credit
Explore these test results →

View this model’s answers, code and tool activity →

Reading research papers · Thinking on
Average score4.2/100 · Answer token F1
Test coverage8 of 8 tasks scored
Task outcomes0 full credit · 1 partial · 7 no credit
Explore these test results →

View this model’s answers, code and tool activity →

Original analysis generated by GPT Astra · · Edited by Codex; agent reviewed by Codex · publication authorized by user

About this summary

Codex reviewed this assessment against a newer evidence edition. The original analyst, generation date and source draft remain recorded separately from the editorial revision.

Analyst provider
openai
Generation route
Codex CLI · codex-cli 0.162.1 · ChatGPT account
Requested model
gpt-6-astra
Returned model
Not supplied; identity is recorded from the request only.
Exact provider snapshot
Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
Reasoning effort
high
Prompt version
model-summary-reader-v6
Generation time
2026-10-12T05:16:23.668339Z
Review time
2026-10-22T05:55:43.651919+00:00
Evidence reviewer
Codex (agent)
Publication authorization
User · 2026-10-22T05:55:43.625712+00:00 · Go ahead and complete the remaining work. Spin up agents: luna, terra, sol, astra, as needed to get it done. Narrative summaries: these are the astra generated summaries? Go ahead and get those completed as well. Once all of this is done, you may push the completed result.
Originating evidence edition
dataset-b1aa28e61ea9ce402d5617e636622c22565093f8849fd66537b5f4353d228521
Analysis input hash
80074c792ba62639150fc676be115b51a276062f85bf6f996f7c15abbb849277
Original analysis input hash
df1879d46f59494191320b15bcdb41b3d5a982d48865334161150eaa9c84b8ec
Editorial evidence edition
dataset-5a6f96ec56c3d240cc42fa23147c1495da1be71f3ef0722c0e5f8c4f5e126a83
Original summary
summary-2957e17ba7669dd82ad1743ef27e89ebc3688aface677ea4179f8ab8fa8ab6c7
Summary revision
summary-0b7688cd43655293da0c45276a6caf74f247e1fe45c377454f3e7239cd13efd2

Generation and editorial authorship remain attached to this revision. Changing the default generator does not change this attribution.

Contributing analyses (36)
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    example_analysis
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    5bdd01a521cc2de7a20fef65c316192286369c64dc81f0b0eace7af70b17332c
    Summary revision
    summary-0793133a92a64476e0ee895f82eade8c2e1ba836c91dabbcc9e78d91035da8a3
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    suite_analysis
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    677426b14d1ab974f6818b70043d9a0ae10bed424e360917b6fad459754aff65
    Summary revision
    summary-081f45c1e1a136375be6d20978738a687f95e8184d0780ea66fd815c88a04ba2
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    evidence_segment
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    65c54efb78ba1e309251a505e5faf4f4083b03385778b0cc88cc3b86662743e6
    Summary revision
    summary-0eed96b1ce97ce3f0769c6a3ff263eddca7650ab11dd5e9cb785150df726e2dd
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    evidence_segment
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    3f9a6d9c48b2ca30babaf35b7231e4c9e2c129e6b1daae6b3f8664d61cc961d9
    Summary revision
    summary-10ad17a2a17bff9bea87e290ba2c699305db2cb2c8032ffd8453f50b7e736e3c
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    evidence_segment
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    f3a2e14ef133959a9748cf883ca95e09f70fe46c3e06f2bccacf4d07c6fed200
    Summary revision
    summary-14bf697a3338b808172a10fd85816befea4836defad2c3795464b0395e18008c
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    suite_analysis
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    0be127bc5888c2678b31d1eae623eb11dc9c915bf4e1c599f792d957ff30a59c
    Summary revision
    summary-1633f668f1e31626f89734f5d8c75954aa6091bafefd2c1f248437c0aaeddd07
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    suite_analysis
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    b5669f5bc1bc6de3d9cd09ee43e8bef7c68a6406201b306e95fb4ad2d2ab2419
    Summary revision
    summary-2ea73de9df739f7b257720b85502f089847cbf99a8f2dd79eb560a411d1666de
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    evidence_segment
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    15a0082a3bcf8dead79aab19b8fdb7b79e35d6e2624cd1345bc5366665e751ca
    Summary revision
    summary-35116a549f6f962233b81b35d7150ee27fd782da33558e632ab0cf0fa2eba682
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    evidence_segment
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    9c5aec0d9894bfe3a284ca7ed0c3f01bb729864a01107cdd51e475082f112831
    Summary revision
    summary-372ce69f4d7d58d469cea91f10cf990aeb0c06a9884fbec3657483ae984a462b
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    suite_synthesis
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    2ba9b13cb8d3f54997e50d38532dc0c17eba0163587ad59503133eb9e1d01257
    Summary revision
    summary-39e3f7f10ed8031e378c55a73d12303cc0927effcab3fc9d3ff594160dbd37d9
    Input summary revisions
    summary-0793133a92a64476e0ee895f82eade8c2e1ba836c91dabbcc9e78d91035da8a3, summary-0eed96b1ce97ce3f0769c6a3ff263eddca7650ab11dd5e9cb785150df726e2dd, summary-10ad17a2a17bff9bea87e290ba2c699305db2cb2c8032ffd8453f50b7e736e3c, summary-14bf697a3338b808172a10fd85816befea4836defad2c3795464b0395e18008c, summary-4e43d89f4120d4c27476aa8e67f496c32f13fb6e203f112e56d4f553321e2c2c, summary-70724b84d53ddef00ba0cf4c1f5d1d21988053dfa84335b3e18cf03a99a8fa09, summary-7f770bede8d08e32183089d013706f2b3d0fc40d6127ee7c3a4431890f924e59, summary-a7c4e2ceea9a3917d35acadbe85725523a647f771bdeaaff56c34cd52b140fe7, summary-bb602d2891de0968aa074a59071abbe19d5c09bb280875739bb5b6d1ff5c2358, summary-c841f83f048918bd93b64f9d043f790608b4cad03646623699cef26e961fb2cb, summary-d042bba499710e323f2cff24a703b64eff61c71795cc32643c2657d445bdb46c, summary-d133809aefd97c20888a3328d292479e9769488e26259490afb63b5546459256, summary-d867b478361b7ad5e1cbf7e4c8f9d76ccf725e53f007ca76ac7f63fde60fdb25, summary-f449320b73f7c526616339d019075f081de3990169c2de9696ba604d6c8e40d7
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    evidence_segment
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    6388019e09fa0eff4f46d6fd58cf2a3f68d1df491000768c2779cd74b4702a49
    Summary revision
    summary-434522629791a21e0fa400f4495ea66b7e560bf567c00af5d04a9c4f9dc2807d
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    example_analysis
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    e974fc642ae0ca1fb67920e281e283f1708870bb51e4cd5f32232ac8217cf409
    Summary revision
    summary-4a4e500ae4ca9a0a033f199cfd2891a34c7274598323ab71f57f121082d545cf
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    example_analysis
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    4711e0104b5512bb48ca2a4b8f0bae58d98ee6e6c4fb48158d573c839eb7047e
    Summary revision
    summary-4e43d89f4120d4c27476aa8e67f496c32f13fb6e203f112e56d4f553321e2c2c
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    suite_analysis
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    38a838fc54546cb2d90a3b19f87fac4dc1cb8441e9c8e6983b4e8edcb5007df6
    Summary revision
    summary-5fb2fae2218e38fbf8f70efaa99d117a24b9f61f84d9e5bd75422d375bf69ff9
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    suite_analysis
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    430ebd87936405c60ca5aea075f209a87b954c9807a423b5715f6aecc08b67e0
    Summary revision
    summary-66ddf2acfb883207ca2b4343cfaf45d4f8d96536eddd648b1507b6a97d2c7ef4
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    evidence_segment
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    d43f48cf5abafa5f3badbe0b34caa6e4357194a425dcfae37aa9012991895894
    Summary revision
    summary-70724b84d53ddef00ba0cf4c1f5d1d21988053dfa84335b3e18cf03a99a8fa09
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    evidence_segment
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    fbc834f0832e71f3e5903460fd2adc22d4d1a562ab152ae753f34a779f31cb6f
    Summary revision
    summary-7f770bede8d08e32183089d013706f2b3d0fc40d6127ee7c3a4431890f924e59
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    evidence_segment
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    459033b854594eb67928e8f83357e58e1d842944afbdc77754d0cc67e6a72a28
    Summary revision
    summary-83cadbdf8add4040f9cef39cffe933cd25ffade427593d58b4a571e1029cb8f2
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    suite_synthesis
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    41e7253126b06e3d987e1e974abeb04675e24108ecf60d32892a9d8444958524
    Summary revision
    summary-849f04ce916cb4e6bce8f417c2654289c7a6a5686e49630fe36cf8b218acc8fa
    Input summary revisions
    summary-35116a549f6f962233b81b35d7150ee27fd782da33558e632ab0cf0fa2eba682, summary-372ce69f4d7d58d469cea91f10cf990aeb0c06a9884fbec3657483ae984a462b, summary-434522629791a21e0fa400f4495ea66b7e560bf567c00af5d04a9c4f9dc2807d, summary-4a4e500ae4ca9a0a033f199cfd2891a34c7274598323ab71f57f121082d545cf, summary-83cadbdf8add4040f9cef39cffe933cd25ffade427593d58b4a571e1029cb8f2, summary-8cf095969910f6fd99d0c3d0499ab4d39c0c2d13a38ba0c2c45c5c5cae021568, summary-9c6f58443993e8a5aa0876074cae54048b0f23948f4328bdd163d1e1fe87b48f, summary-ac248859e1090b6abb082671175045f8e9cfb537678a218c777039fcfc805cf7, summary-beda6e0be49b9e974b594339f6343662974180c70e32a0b344123c734fa6ec65, summary-c84fe0b8842df45bc159fb98f595b9c1d616f49cc228956ec3a773711569d153, summary-eb8bb307d17ec7c78b78df49f0bbe954ca343c33bb43c1821a44a3dd45148786, summary-f3f2c63ef621a3fc57632bef3e2491a822950d98a936dbb4ffe5f35a34faba94
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    example_analysis
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    fd61e6c733c80a1d6980f29869455777b6c189a4b702dbb7b1feffa2cb677ec4
    Summary revision
    summary-8cf095969910f6fd99d0c3d0499ab4d39c0c2d13a38ba0c2c45c5c5cae021568
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    suite_analysis
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    1a487f427b88305c527ebd7ab3ec4c79f0ccd2af2b295ec1fbd0d3b510eff734
    Summary revision
    summary-9b078a871da18d879722fcd6d9749731207fa5dd5d4c7c70839f8a3b9f88df2a
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    evidence_segment
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    ddda445372b969207e6cd118d9e26938f850340a798022909e4be3376d5847ce
    Summary revision
    summary-9c6f58443993e8a5aa0876074cae54048b0f23948f4328bdd163d1e1fe87b48f
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    evidence_segment
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    7b99e2ce7db9b1c63bc6913a655c65b07cf060b052aafe1917b74651644c5d94
    Summary revision
    summary-a7c4e2ceea9a3917d35acadbe85725523a647f771bdeaaff56c34cd52b140fe7
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    example_analysis
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    8fe9fb9ccd227f3c215993f23a07f0a3c901a497b25be5ab50e5e446b325c895
    Summary revision
    summary-ac248859e1090b6abb082671175045f8e9cfb537678a218c777039fcfc805cf7
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    suite_analysis
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    ccba08b6017560a544602a79496096cfcd323f06a35aa1428f4714d43bb34024
    Summary revision
    summary-acefdf59173bb505794299d0689b67758e8f62440d4f3414a0d0f87c32f59c05
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    evidence_segment
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    89ba0c138de3abbd7860d16590f1e910be159ac1a7e5c4b8fb787588da05df01
    Summary revision
    summary-bb602d2891de0968aa074a59071abbe19d5c09bb280875739bb5b6d1ff5c2358
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    evidence_segment
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    b92a0ffdb0235c3351eff9ba05b2a3607ee7ae3ee9827117dc82e337cc33bd51
    Summary revision
    summary-beda6e0be49b9e974b594339f6343662974180c70e32a0b344123c734fa6ec65
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    example_analysis
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    51c226ed4cca1d9d0f930ee19b8869644c5dafb9096972277c5bf271b8fd4a17
    Summary revision
    summary-c841f83f048918bd93b64f9d043f790608b4cad03646623699cef26e961fb2cb
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    evidence_segment
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    654b236781a3329aee03906e9c079d82899cad0863f40b223b22ad21f3e862ae
    Summary revision
    summary-c84fe0b8842df45bc159fb98f595b9c1d616f49cc228956ec3a773711569d153
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    evidence_segment
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    54bd50e96fc9137d490a0953bc8247ed4cea48c2fd08180dda9fc9e3b89f86b1
    Summary revision
    summary-d042bba499710e323f2cff24a703b64eff61c71795cc32643c2657d445bdb46c
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    evidence_segment
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    4439311d3e7adcebe5167340fed899135760c178f24eae5500bd4fcdb1ac42c7
    Summary revision
    summary-d133809aefd97c20888a3328d292479e9769488e26259490afb63b5546459256
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    example_analysis
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    ee7a177d224be8a0850907a7b406312582400bb8f6d2cad88be9849fc591dfda
    Summary revision
    summary-d867b478361b7ad5e1cbf7e4c8f9d76ccf725e53f007ca76ac7f63fde60fdb25
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    evidence_segment
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    bfab8012f3b200618801ff4437496677d273270a7e5c11d3bc107f3b71691643
    Summary revision
    summary-eb8bb307d17ec7c78b78df49f0bbe954ca343c33bb43c1821a44a3dd45148786
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    example_analysis
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    fc2ed19e49896dc678df147fbc03664556c5cbd0c76fab7bbdf811e7c2ab34ba
    Summary revision
    summary-f3f2c63ef621a3fc57632bef3e2491a822950d98a936dbb4ffe5f35a34faba94
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    evidence_segment
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    ec80e1a68f97945c144e46f7512c26fd50be447c52cb51e14e61fa666d768e4d
    Summary revision
    summary-f449320b73f7c526616339d019075f081de3990169c2de9696ba604d6c8e40d7
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    subject_synthesis
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    94772b5141f96fa1c34ce714289be037210800a0ec5292b70103decd3f2121ec
    Summary revision
    summary-fd2e5e2e7e4de355e34e4044115f5fbc4100fce332338e577d4b0e1cd1aed936
    Input summary revisions
    summary-081f45c1e1a136375be6d20978738a687f95e8184d0780ea66fd815c88a04ba2, summary-1633f668f1e31626f89734f5d8c75954aa6091bafefd2c1f248437c0aaeddd07, summary-2ea73de9df739f7b257720b85502f089847cbf99a8f2dd79eb560a411d1666de, summary-39e3f7f10ed8031e378c55a73d12303cc0927effcab3fc9d3ff594160dbd37d9, summary-5fb2fae2218e38fbf8f70efaa99d117a24b9f61f84d9e5bd75422d375bf69ff9, summary-66ddf2acfb883207ca2b4343cfaf45d4f8d96536eddd648b1507b6a97d2c7ef4, summary-849f04ce916cb4e6bce8f417c2654289c7a6a5686e49630fe36cf8b218acc8fa, summary-9b078a871da18d879722fcd6d9749731207fa5dd5d4c7c70839f8a3b9f88df2a, summary-acefdf59173bb505794299d0689b67758e8f62440d4f3414a0d0f87c32f59c05

Good at

Larger practical tasks are a real use case with thinking enabled: it completed 10 of 11 tasks across app-building, information organization and file or web investigation.

Evidence for this judgment
Larger practical tasks · Thinking on
Average score90.9/100 · Mean task credit
Test coverage11 of 11 tasks scored
Task outcomes10 full credit · 0 partial · 1 no credit
Explore these test results →

View this model’s answers, code and tool activity →

Handles short passage questions well with thinking off. It also passed every controlled test of retaining a supported answer under challenge and changing it when the source changed.

Evidence for this judgment
Reading without guessing · Thinking off
Tasks passed15 of 16 (93.8%)
Test coverage16 of 16 tasks scored
Explore these test results →

View this model’s answers, code and tool activity →

Resisting incorrect corrections · Thinking off
Tasks passed12 of 12 (100.0%)
Test coverage12 of 12 tasks scored
Explore these test results →

View this model’s answers, code and tool activity →

Struggles with

Research-paper answers had very low answer-matching scores in both modes. Do not rely on it to extract dependable answers and supporting evidence from papers without checking the originals.

Evidence for this judgment
Reading research papers · Thinking off
Average score9.5/100 · Answer token F1
Test coverage8 of 8 tasks scored
Task outcomes0 full credit · 2 partial · 6 no credit
Explore these test results →

View this model’s answers, code and tool activity →

Reading research papers · Thinking on
Average score4.2/100 · Answer token F1
Test coverage8 of 8 tasks scored
Task outcomes0 full credit · 1 partial · 7 no credit
Explore these test results →

View this model’s answers, code and tool activity →

Difficult math and reasoning remain uneven with thinking enabled. Results on this small selection do not justify trusting an unchecked solution.

Evidence for this judgment
Published hard problems · Thinking on
Average score63.9/100 · Mean answer credit
Test coverage11 of 11 tasks scored
Task outcomes7 full credit · 1 partial · 3 no credit
Explore these test results →

View this model’s answers, code and tool activity →

Can get stuck repeating rejected tool calls instead of applying a fix. In the small-coding examples checked, this left requested changes unapplied despite identifying the needed edits.

Evidence for this judgment

Example 1: Everyday coding tasks
Thinking on. Final result: no credit. A final score does not describe every tool step; this example supports a behavior observation, not a whole-test conclusion.
View the question and recorded answer →

Example 2: Everyday coding tasks
Thinking off. Final result: no credit. A final score does not describe every tool step; this example supports a behavior observation, not a whole-test conclusion.
View the question and recorded answer →

Should you enable thinking?

Keep thinking off for everyday edits and finding answers in passages: paired tests showed unchanged overall accuracy but longer task times with thinking enabled.

Evidence for this judgment
Everyday coding tasks · Thinking off versus on
Thinking off → on93.8% · Task pass rate → 93.8% · Task pass rate
Paired test coverage16 of 16 tasks compared in both modes
Tasks timed in both modes16 pairs
Average time change with thinking on51.9 seconds slower
Explore these test results →

View this model’s answers, code and tool activity →

Reading without guessing · Thinking off versus on
Thinking off → on93.8% · Exact-match accuracy → 93.8% · Exact-match accuracy
Paired test coverage16 of 16 tasks compared in both modes
Tasks timed in both modes16 pairs
Average time change with thinking on22.1 seconds slower
Explore these test results →

View this model’s answers, code and tool activity →

Enable thinking selectively for longer practical tasks and strict instructions. Both improved, but average task time rose substantially: better results came with longer waits, not a universally better everyday setting.

Evidence for this judgment
Larger practical tasks · Thinking off versus on
Thinking off → on72.7/100 · Mean task credit → 90.9/100 · Mean task credit
Paired test coverage11 of 11 tasks compared in both modes
Tasks timed in both modes11 pairs
Average time change with thinking on256.5 seconds slower
Explore these test results →

View this model’s answers, code and tool activity →

Following exact instructions · Thinking off versus on
Thinking off → on82.6% · Strict prompt compliance → 95.7% · Strict prompt compliance
Paired test coverage23 of 23 tasks compared in both modes
Tasks timed in both modes23 pairs
Average time change with thinking on110.1 seconds slower
Explore these test results →

View this model’s answers, code and tool activity →

Worth knowing

Publication redactions and withheld artifacts limit reader inspection of some examples, including full paper-containing inputs.

Evidence for this judgment

Source limitation
Some selected evidence has recorded publication redactions.

How to interpret these assessments and their limitations →

One weight format is recorded for this model. Additional tested formats will appear here when available.

Thinking tradeoff

16/16 matched scored questions · 16/16 matched timed questions

Thinking offMean matched task credit93.8%
Thinking onMean matched task credit93.8%

Thinking on took 51.9 seconds more per matched timed question, on average.

All matched quality and timing measurements
Matched measurementRecorded result
Average credit, off → on93.8% → 93.8%
Mean paired credit change0.0 percentage points
Question outcomes1 improved · 14 unchanged · 1 worse
Mean added task time+51.9s
Mean task time, off → on23.4s → 75.4s
Median task time, off → on19.6s → 41.1s
Median of paired time changes+24.1s
Total added task time+831.2s
Ratio of summed times, on / off3.2×

Quality and timing can cover different subsets. Median paired change is calculated per question; it is not the difference between the two medians. Task time includes tools and grading.

Inspect the matched modes and their answers →
Inspect individual matched questions

Sampled repetitions

Repeated runs are a separate experiment and never add votes to the baseline score.

Thinking off · temperature 0.6

48/48 repeats scored · 45 full-credit repeats.

16/16 questions have every planned repeat scored. Of those, 14 earned full credit on every repeat.

Recorded repetition conditions
  • Seed 303 · requested off · verified
  • Seed 202 · requested off · verified
  • Seed 101 · requested off · verified

Everyday coding tasks: recorded outcomes

Find information in a small project, edit files and fix bugs.

15 full credit1 failed to finish

Each segment counts tasks, not credit points. Partial credit varies by task.

Scoring and fixed question bank →

This model’s answers, code and tool activity

Select a question to read the original answer, tool calls and available code changes for this configuration and thinking setting.

1–16 of 16 matching questions · 16 in this version

  • Locate the Retry Limit

    The user asks where the project's retry-limit setting is defined and what value it holds. This exercises locating a named setting in code and reporting both its location and value.

    basic-T1 · primary
  • Find the Release Date

    The user asks for the release date mentioned in a project notes document. This exercises reading a specified file and extracting a particular fact rather than guessing from outside knowledge.

    basic-T2 · primary
  • Change the Retry Limit

    The user asks to change the project's retry limit to a specified value. This exercises finding the relevant setting and making a focused code edit rather than merely describing the change.

    basic-T3 · primary
  • Create an Exact One-Line File

    The user asks to create a text file containing exactly one supplied line. This exercises basic file creation and precise instruction following, including avoiding extra text in the file.

    basic-T4 · primary
  • Explain the Latest Commit

    The user asks what the most recent Git commit changed in the project. This exercises inspecting recorded changes and turning them into a clear explanation of what was modified.

    basic-T5 · primary
  • Count and Compare Python Files

    The user asks how many Python files are in the application folder and which is largest. This exercises identifying relevant files, counting them, and comparing their sizes.

    basic-T6 · primary
  • Add Readable Byte Sizes

    The user asks to add a function that converts byte counts into readable sizes and remove the related TODO comment. This exercises implementing a small utility and updating the surrounding code consistently.

    basic-T7 · primary
  • Collect TODO Comments

    The user asks to find every TODO comment in the Python code and append each to the project's task list on a separate line. This combines searching across files with collecting text into an existing document.

    basic-T8 · primary
  • Fix Code Behind a Failing Test

    The user asks to investigate a failing test and fix the application code without changing the test. This exercises diagnosing a bug while respecting an explicit limit on what may be edited.

    basic-H1 · primary
  • Rename a Function Throughout

    The user asks to rename a network function and update every place in the project that uses it. This exercises tracking references across files and making a coordinated change rather than editing only the definition.

    basic-H2 · primary
  • Find the Proxy Settings

    The user asks to find a proxy configuration file somewhere under the project's parent folder and report its host and port. This exercises searching beyond the project folder and reading configuration values.

    basic-H3 · primary
  • Locate an Error in a Log

    The user asks which error code appears in a long event log and on which line. This exercises finding a specific entry in a large file and reporting its precise location.

    basic-H4 · primary
  • Append a Final Task

    The user asks to append a supplied release-related task as the final line of an existing task list. This exercises preserving existing content while adding exact text in the requested position.

    basic-H5 · primary
  • Calculate Total Retry Waiting

    The user asks for the total time a network function spends sleeping when all attempts fail, worked out from the code. This exercises following retry logic and adding the delays along that failure path.

    basic-H6 · primary
  • Document Every Command-Line Option

    The user asks for a project readme listing every command-line option with its help text. This exercises discovering the program's available options and transferring that information into complete, source-grounded documentation.

    basic-H7 · primary
  • Undo a Commit by Editing

    The user asks to undo the latest Git commit's change by editing the file directly, without using Git to make changes. This exercises understanding a previous edit and reversing it under a method constraint.

    basic-H8 · primary
Filters change this list, not the fixed scoring denominator. Search currently covers question IDs, titles and available task explanations. Focus a control to load prompt/outcome search where this edition provides it.

Suggested comparisons

These are starting points for inspection, not claims that one setup is better. Runtime and placement differences remain visible.

Thinking on versus off

Verified requested on/off conditions of the same configuration, matched on the recorded test protocol.

Requested thinking on · Complete compared coverage

Compare these configurations →

Selection rule and evidence IDsPolicy comparisons-v3 · Template verified-thinking-pair
Facts: paired-ab91058a7245485488f3478a
Matching candidate set: paired-ab91058a7245485488f3478a

Ornith 1.5 9B Q8_0

Another checkpoint in the same total-parameter band and architecture category, with matching task controls.

Requested thinking off · Complete compared coverage

Compare these configurations →

Selection rule and evidence IDsPolicy comparisons-v3 · Template same-parameter-architecture-matching-controls
Facts: fact-eacdd70113b5633f3f223c12, fact-200d3a80040bda993709f78f
Matching candidate set: fact-200d3a80040bda993709f78f, fact-81703cf46648d0b2de523fad, fact-bb58072f1c77808045477c91, fact-e57043e6128b693616991807, fact-e2c619b31f8a88c1472ca60e, fact-9b097653ded9dc087919acf0, fact-3f910f804bc145423c5f4359, fact-9f9b21c2355c6bdb5b2dd393, fact-1eaacebf5d4775d7901754f8, fact-5c36b6f6bfeaa5ee466506f6, fact-bef3eb6c6baa2d44e3aa0649, fact-ec911e6561843ecc14d3482a, fact-eae080b73ed21e846eaa5d1d, fact-490482dd62af02e41d2fc20e, fact-6808af8c64a1e7875a14e7a6, fact-2e2fe4760014b5b180de8620, fact-6d911759dd69ca545ee8be5c, fact-f0e7d2286cd806072751d966

Tested weights

Q6_K · 10.24 GB

bartowski · recorded source

53336de05c4af36dcb61daf0d984be076ddf0245e3ce7f61aa10b72cb4044e97 · Exact GGUF file →Historical first-MiB hash only; not a full-file identity.

Explore the answers

Choose a suite to inspect its exact available questions, references and model answers.