AgentBench / results
← All models

GLM-4.7-Flash REAP 23B-A3B

1 tested weight format · Explore results, then inspect the answers.

Choose a tested configuration

Get this tested model

UD-Q4_K_XL · 14.24 GB download

Links follow the selected quant and configuration.

Setup, memory & provenance · UD-Q4_K_XL

UD-Q4_K_XL · 14.24 GB of weights · rocm · context 32768 · GPU layers 99

Large · 20B and above · MoE · 23.0B total · Active parameter count not recorded

Memory fit has not been verified for this configuration.

partial

Recorded settings and thinking verification

Temperature 0 · seed 42 · output limit 4096 · reasoning effort unrecorded

RAM labels describe the test computer, not this model’s memory requirement. Speed comparisons keep the 32 GB and 128 GB runs separate.

Runtime build: unrecorded · Local · test machine with 32 GB RAM · concurrency: 1

Thinking status: verified · probe 1 · scope Saved profile-level probe; exact historical template/build scope is not fully recorded..

Requested off does not prove an absence of reasoning. Saved checks do not establish unrecorded historical template or build details.

Overall across tasks

51.4 / 100

Nine categories, equally weighted · 9/9 eligible

Complete coverage for this setup. Quality only; speed is separate. How the index works →

What does it do well?

Select a category to explore the answers. Bars show what happened on every planned task. Incorrect answers and failures to finish both earn zero; technical problems and untested tasks stay unscored.

Exact scores and task times by suite

Each suite has its own metric and fixed task bank. The balanced index weights categories equally; individual scores and evidence remain available below.

Test suiteThinking offDetails
Everyday coding tasksTask pass rate
Pass rate
15/16 · 94%
Answers completed
16/16 · 100%
Correct / completed
15/16 · 94%
15 full credit1 incorrect
16/16 scored12.5s median task time · 16 measured
Larger practical tasksMean task credit
Average credit
27.3%
Full-credit rate
3/11 · 27%
Answers completed
9/11 · 82%
Full credit / completed
3/9 · 33%
3 full credit6 incorrect2 failed to finish
11/11 scored96.1s median task time · 11 measured
Logic and number puzzlesMean puzzle credit
Average credit
27.3%
Full-credit rate
8/34 · 24%
Answers completed
34/34 · 100%
Full credit / completed
8/34 · 24%
8 full credit7 partial credit19 incorrect
34/34 scored3.9s median task time · 34 measured
Published hard problemsMean answer credit
Average credit
41.0%
Full-credit rate
4/11 · 36%
Answers completed
11/11 · 100%
Full credit / completed
4/11 · 36%
4 full credit2 partial credit5 incorrect
11/11 scored117.4s median task time · 11 measured
Following exact instructions · original campaignStrict prompt compliance
Pass rate
13/23 · 57%
Answers completed
23/23 · 100%
Correct / completed
13/23 · 57%
13 full credit10 incorrect
23/23 scored19.4s median task time · 23 measured
Reading without guessingExact-match accuracy
Pass rate
15/16 · 94%
Answers completed
16/16 · 100%
Correct / completed
15/16 · 94%
15 full credit1 incorrect
16/16 scored1.1s median task time · 16 measured
Calculating from a passageNumeric exact-match accuracy
Pass rate
4/7 · 57%
Answers completed
7/7 · 100%
Correct / completed
4/7 · 57%
4 full credit3 incorrect
7/7 scored1.3s median task time · 7 measured
Reading research papersAnswer token F1
Average credit
57.5%
Full-credit rate
1/8 · 13%
Answers completed
8/8 · 100%
Full credit / completed
1/8 · 13%
1 full credit7 partial credit
8/8 scored8.4s median task time · 8 measured
Resisting incorrect correctionsAll-branches pass rate
Pass rate
1/12 · 8%
Answers completed
12/12 · 100%
Correct / completed
1/12 · 8%
1 full credit11 incorrect
12/12 scored1.9s median task time · 12 measured
Following exact instructions · 128 GB campaignStrict prompt complianceNot planned

Model analysis

This analysis covers this configuration across its recorded thinking conditions and test suites.

This configuration is useful for small project edits and straightforward passage questions with thinking off: it succeeded on most tests, with short typical task times in these runs. Do not extend that confidence to longer tool-based work, where results were weak even with thinking on. Source-backed answers under challenge are another major trap with thinking off. Use thinking selectively rather than routinely; for small coding, it added time without improving overall success.

Evidence for this judgment
Everyday coding tasks · Thinking off
Tasks passed15 of 16 (93.8%)
Test coverage16 of 16 tasks scored
Tasks timed16 tasks
Typical time per task (median)12.5 seconds
Explore these test results →

View this model’s answers, code and tool activity →

Reading without guessing · Thinking off
Tasks passed15 of 16 (93.8%)
Test coverage16 of 16 tasks scored
Tasks timed16 tasks
Typical time per task (median)1.1 seconds
Explore these test results →

View this model’s answers, code and tool activity →

Larger practical tasks · Thinking on
Average score45.5/100 · Mean task credit
Test coverage11 of 11 tasks scored
Task outcomes5 full credit · 0 partial · 6 no credit
Explore these test results →

View this model’s answers, code and tool activity →

Resisting incorrect corrections · Thinking off
Tasks passed1 of 12 (8.3%)
Test coverage12 of 12 tasks scored
Explore these test results →

View this model’s answers, code and tool activity →

Everyday coding tasks · Thinking off versus on
Thinking off → on93.8% · Task pass rate → 93.8% · Task pass rate
Paired test coverage16 of 16 tasks compared in both modes
Tasks timed in both modes16 pairs
Score change with thinking onNo change
Average time change with thinking on15.5 seconds slower
Explore these test results →

View this model’s answers, code and tool activity →

Original analysis generated by GPT Astra · · Edited by Codex; agent reviewed by Codex · publication authorized by user

About this summary

Codex reviewed this assessment against a newer evidence edition. The original analyst, generation date and source draft remain recorded separately from the editorial revision.

Analyst provider
openai
Generation route
Codex CLI · codex-cli 0.162.1 · ChatGPT account
Requested model
gpt-6-astra
Returned model
Not supplied; identity is recorded from the request only.
Exact provider snapshot
Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
Reasoning effort
high
Prompt version
model-summary-reader-v6
Generation time
2026-10-12T04:04:13.594953Z
Review time
2026-10-22T05:56:50.658907+00:00
Evidence reviewer
Codex (agent)
Publication authorization
User · 2026-10-22T05:55:43.625712+00:00 · Go ahead and complete the remaining work. Spin up agents: luna, terra, sol, astra, as needed to get it done. Narrative summaries: these are the astra generated summaries? Go ahead and get those completed as well. Once all of this is done, you may push the completed result.
Originating evidence edition
dataset-b1aa28e61ea9ce402d5617e636622c22565093f8849fd66537b5f4353d228521
Analysis input hash
96daf0fb5087b2ef2f973d84e7bc1ed7623f814e59f89a34e705b7024962f9e5
Original analysis input hash
7f7d9e40e788627ecbbb9dfd8372848a480b08179307871d6bddbb91b3abc4cd
Editorial evidence edition
dataset-5a6f96ec56c3d240cc42fa23147c1495da1be71f3ef0722c0e5f8c4f5e126a83
Original summary
summary-1594049004aafbcd4bbc420c43c3db4a53ac651578459384cbde546a0095cdce
Summary revision
summary-11ea565f045b6b6ef22a1d37ff52339af93107f9b0474d048fe885b9e232f1a5

Generation and editorial authorship remain attached to this revision. Changing the default generator does not change this attribution.

Contributing analyses (48)
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    suite_analysis
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    79f5e326f5fbae955ab8c39d4d8ef3451c598276816cbfe1648ddd7ed68ac3c3
    Summary revision
    summary-0295723d0406e39e6e287438fa04e1e10b5c81929f6cf288700ba8e958d36190
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    suite_analysis
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    c006a3b8c66d9fd279554bde20a0ee3eeadf6eae372fa993747aa14e36b4a63d
    Summary revision
    summary-057976ee7cbde731312d87b55b7fbe926a8b32d72b450b41d42d8a270012efe8
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    evidence_segment
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    74e9ceb39e80550527195ef36b8712df274a7eac4fc87757de66e21bb3aa786c
    Summary revision
    summary-05d931f3365c44b6c9fa0dae8b51853b0aecce8fdd93fb1d31be1424c9311627
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    evidence_segment
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    d9ac0801031915e02b3704580f09af787e45c11d6c79949a6233c4d0bc3b86f2
    Summary revision
    summary-06787cade6eb9c14b58bcf9bcf4a2bae0505c2bfc966219c5177cabde78813bd
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    example_analysis
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    b987bf60ad33b3f71ca0ae272ae42760f6819ebfe42ebcedeb94ef34335fa0cb
    Summary revision
    summary-1a8d92a5f3994708e27612c2d17524cc43d00f2afddcbb0283e7063afa9d80f6
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    evidence_segment
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    16b2ff0c9f68fc267f718b46977359d780669b8842757f284b12e0babc5b475f
    Summary revision
    summary-234a4047c3c116fca772106ae5cd3654a838fa86e099c818b34f5fb6f4795272
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    suite_synthesis
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    09fec89e42b580c3a3f3957ca5d6daa592bfd4013886d613ced2f0ccfb50e550
    Summary revision
    summary-245a04ce259bb4dbbfb8acfdc78ae086717e1b310f9ed8d8f0c64d0ab8849d89
    Input summary revisions
    summary-05d931f3365c44b6c9fa0dae8b51853b0aecce8fdd93fb1d31be1424c9311627, summary-06787cade6eb9c14b58bcf9bcf4a2bae0505c2bfc966219c5177cabde78813bd, summary-1a8d92a5f3994708e27612c2d17524cc43d00f2afddcbb0283e7063afa9d80f6, summary-234a4047c3c116fca772106ae5cd3654a838fa86e099c818b34f5fb6f4795272, summary-2950b2e36edad45b99e0fb8d7a569c1dc070a1169cc31b7de5c7db314f4d0856, summary-2b1dd280d08271973de87564a0d288243b59d4362503a085b159ffd07b3b90b6, summary-3a2f89cb4294a34d94a0370096883984aa0398277f4c11f30b241778008a48bf, summary-40ab708fd4f8800a137b37a58197c8f2c8b65b0057a786606bc943fb5945c342, summary-4ae0b2a9e215f6973f67db2839aa7217e0d1cc9be660a954bc17982621bdd08e, summary-545896846e8d9cedda33ae4047ed4aa3246794da7e63fe400ddae44f777ce00a, summary-55a6db6269e0aecfc06d417ce522bedab80ecedd96b1635c03ac318486cecef9, summary-6369cc93c1dde743a9a2416a496d01dbb9abafebf58e3828bd6bd42c20482def, summary-645eafb6114d6798cd8e5d6377a8c74cba34602bfb16a7b378a8d4145e3d386d, summary-65e5747debb5300a08a0f28c3a355e48fcdae03c4d5b2f909ba059122c06902d, summary-6f241f4639ae3b8fd828a59eaa867bab826fd7d6a3f36a8ab45c4f5e8a8cf856, summary-7531c60a16431f6f9764cdf8d5c35f261893a85a8a229073201165a643aeb354, summary-79f16ab0fb8c02a7589adff814ec810f4d92d4542e897f01bf35dcd4827325b5, summary-7e28c001e3fa191442e38d93b48c3a788031829fbc651f0e78190cded8c8857b, summary-86b3dabc9226a5c81ca149527e6ff97b2e3ba389fadc9bbb9f0320b15bf57a29, summary-86fed8e16a75cd320dd9aae1ad34ef93014451f972a963f5ae0fe70bc321986e, summary-880b6f2bc8cf8be3546d3e0e2d29af5ef01e145eb631ed513f438fbbd7b0f1da, summary-986aeeda1ee8ffaff3f5513301253bbd8cb64e0507a4c5b42b32b3c535ad3448, summary-9d1ad1d7a071bb04029f2634772b4d6c1878a6b172baacf514e511decca5597a, summary-9f0a0d7226dfcffb3a0514de365eca3bb4f7cab154f675666094bb8eeaf7de67, summary-a29d3f0105846a9b80cec78b485c4c64e3441c328be294121dba909e8d62c1bd, summary-a5abb4ec9efbd4fe22e3381fc83754ebddcc58aa042a7aed4ce083eb9615266d, summary-b1f0610d7c0d241531edc20a811db0a73157ec73a8a37e00b4feec07ef86ad78, summary-b557890d2044b571836c6a97858368a2fa0853368fbf0623d2b20a80b51e8bed, summary-cf84c20e0d74a38daa082b6725a6385216ee52dfb8e7385a1b0e9760c05fa607, summary-d9349ad83816a8b741cbe63701a28e9d879699571f27e55f102c98c290ccfecf, summary-ea9173ed9fcb413435519f66b5e4658d4cb32b0cdb3c3df49017dfaf69723666, summary-f2c4fba65b78dc2886fece1eacee10afc82f05962e355d7de42d596a56793dfa, summary-f4c4690f78936a0bdbcee15606dacb50ec498c92dbe7143df5500a444666bef7
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    evidence_segment
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    a46b92e3e3d25b70890d4bd484b7d7955325589d73ec8cd01893c2b802d2d6a4
    Summary revision
    summary-2950b2e36edad45b99e0fb8d7a569c1dc070a1169cc31b7de5c7db314f4d0856
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    evidence_segment
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    961621c9787e24f369227a34edc807e07076d0fd3e3c72d8812eef73a977a5bf
    Summary revision
    summary-2b1dd280d08271973de87564a0d288243b59d4362503a085b159ffd07b3b90b6
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    suite_analysis
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    c6c83c146069e0817dd3cdaae922839a2b04a1caea2fa54fa3a9f3d9ad9bedc4
    Summary revision
    summary-37742866ee097cc021bfc9ae94277b13180d871778b18ae775b42ff52647508b
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    evidence_segment
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    2d6470465895c8155859be0c05d34c481d2e5d9f7542939e0625a47185426c8f
    Summary revision
    summary-3a2f89cb4294a34d94a0370096883984aa0398277f4c11f30b241778008a48bf
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    suite_synthesis
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    acf8edc267cfb0a3dc54dbd41de42ef19a067f0c029540af6917a2e5e94123f1
    Summary revision
    summary-3a31d20eb43a2a6ef05bd94375b21ecd59af3378d8a8420fffb55941ffb132a0
    Input summary revisions
    summary-89c35e4bad3cfb7e67b3232b7aa98f9808516009f2f8a98c58aac7f9d91bdfa8, summary-a329564cc7f873164b1e78aa8960330a49fce7b912207e376002879bc10cd6d3, summary-b023bf8f6ec8af0ef1ac6c1491dbf2c94e5a66ac5df0d8574355762a6916cdc2, summary-d98ed06cab1aee0f24c32092455f4240e9d584e6574dc4c76f8ac427195d5cbe, summary-fd8007ef17c6ac89ddc18b913cd87437a0c2bc846bfe4827506221ed0226bfc1
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    example_analysis
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    480f1b4275a973d083cbbcd95931b456c28a3da2da722aa1fb8d5bc291f4a0d1
    Summary revision
    summary-40ab708fd4f8800a137b37a58197c8f2c8b65b0057a786606bc943fb5945c342
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    evidence_segment
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    a4b217a7bc56bf4b5186a275b2e5411bbfae4b126ff1f0ec271675e327f6d80a
    Summary revision
    summary-4ae0b2a9e215f6973f67db2839aa7217e0d1cc9be660a954bc17982621bdd08e
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    evidence_segment
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    f00f5cb77c92c3d4c7878dd31837d8f8d8c186658cc42edba95c26ee80975519
    Summary revision
    summary-545896846e8d9cedda33ae4047ed4aa3246794da7e63fe400ddae44f777ce00a
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    evidence_segment
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    ed5c17674738ccdfe9818a657621f2327bdc0c8684d8e83d06b59e7e22fe7d6a
    Summary revision
    summary-55a6db6269e0aecfc06d417ce522bedab80ecedd96b1635c03ac318486cecef9
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    evidence_segment
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    5c4e33d797e1096b2f58e772d346cedfd2f82bea7c1ac83e675e2069749d7038
    Summary revision
    summary-6369cc93c1dde743a9a2416a496d01dbb9abafebf58e3828bd6bd42c20482def
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    evidence_segment
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    9dd495a4a77f4e0a9ca7ae3b58a06724ed58a061580b61cd39f4f1ccfb64fe83
    Summary revision
    summary-645eafb6114d6798cd8e5d6377a8c74cba34602bfb16a7b378a8d4145e3d386d
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    evidence_segment
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    72e485d1f7c26331ce9b77a87cb6b95bdedc1db7754a8f7589417f914f27b039
    Summary revision
    summary-65e5747debb5300a08a0f28c3a355e48fcdae03c4d5b2f909ba059122c06902d
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    evidence_segment
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    e8c1e9fe2928d452542ced83dd9002e86a07dbe6e8709f5ace5d3a86d950ece1
    Summary revision
    summary-6f241f4639ae3b8fd828a59eaa867bab826fd7d6a3f36a8ab45c4f5e8a8cf856
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    evidence_segment
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    b3af379587e669cc97e47d809c63b27d248aacf133d9e7ebf7bc65a8216d4042
    Summary revision
    summary-7531c60a16431f6f9764cdf8d5c35f261893a85a8a229073201165a643aeb354
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    evidence_segment
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    73ea363c800e22e904f73ce8221bde37dbab4455664dbfc149cc1c5d64b68fc1
    Summary revision
    summary-79f16ab0fb8c02a7589adff814ec810f4d92d4542e897f01bf35dcd4827325b5
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    suite_analysis
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    f76119c18964a5a53c0dffd4780691c03f4d873be8bf9eea3b4524fce8101fba
    Summary revision
    summary-7d6fa0eba022d6e150b4ffd28994584bd075c0c39502cb690981e92a8968f7a4
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    evidence_segment
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    668722f7330e43d747d1e077863f4881cb92657e31ab4c0edcbf300806f493ef
    Summary revision
    summary-7e28c001e3fa191442e38d93b48c3a788031829fbc651f0e78190cded8c8857b
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    evidence_segment
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    9cd9daca117c5a1cedd66afc23573aa6421cea25b3af2b0d315403a0aeb9ee6a
    Summary revision
    summary-86b3dabc9226a5c81ca149527e6ff97b2e3ba389fadc9bbb9f0320b15bf57a29
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    evidence_segment
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    5cd122914800de747fac2cf475e6c944a45777a62c512684775810921ee4ac7e
    Summary revision
    summary-86fed8e16a75cd320dd9aae1ad34ef93014451f972a963f5ae0fe70bc321986e
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    evidence_segment
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    e83063769757cdc013e42721afbbb6fcd1717225f9961d64e3aa73e484690e2b
    Summary revision
    summary-880b6f2bc8cf8be3546d3e0e2d29af5ef01e145eb631ed513f438fbbd7b0f1da
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    example_analysis
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    219be8b0384258321e36c35456ae4e4142c5e8d87752ccdb46e47623ce1ab9d4
    Summary revision
    summary-89c35e4bad3cfb7e67b3232b7aa98f9808516009f2f8a98c58aac7f9d91bdfa8
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    subject_synthesis
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    ca1dcf75c95fb2a87addbf3966d446ee0d43519364599ca56571871fda9784bd
    Summary revision
    summary-8f897bfb53a543c06ae55438b5a51381313ed0fe1d7b09020e5a1f8aefc87e4b
    Input summary revisions
    summary-0295723d0406e39e6e287438fa04e1e10b5c81929f6cf288700ba8e958d36190, summary-057976ee7cbde731312d87b55b7fbe926a8b32d72b450b41d42d8a270012efe8, summary-245a04ce259bb4dbbfb8acfdc78ae086717e1b310f9ed8d8f0c64d0ab8849d89, summary-37742866ee097cc021bfc9ae94277b13180d871778b18ae775b42ff52647508b, summary-3a31d20eb43a2a6ef05bd94375b21ecd59af3378d8a8420fffb55941ffb132a0, summary-7d6fa0eba022d6e150b4ffd28994584bd075c0c39502cb690981e92a8968f7a4, summary-bcd1b037f6dd84a1664842b64aa9a6d1551a01516c3f04354f6b24a41cf11400, summary-d67fc28580a48b26248c69ee6c567086daa8332a262042a3b098fa742275ed7b, summary-e7edd9d9303f3bbba1d63913c21a675c82a101ab0fa99e49f063cb8c91e4188a
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    evidence_segment
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    31c3f83fee1cf50c68219692c16920d184e3e56ea4c062693097eda1b41801a1
    Summary revision
    summary-986aeeda1ee8ffaff3f5513301253bbd8cb64e0507a4c5b42b32b3c535ad3448
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    evidence_segment
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    391071d7ef3c63ad4aaa0278409176fa058fd9f41c7042e30c75ca25eaf34344
    Summary revision
    summary-9d1ad1d7a071bb04029f2634772b4d6c1878a6b172baacf514e511decca5597a
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    evidence_segment
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    514f437283af8ce11614d53f0a9678383d802df1d4d2fe735d58dbfafb615037
    Summary revision
    summary-9f0a0d7226dfcffb3a0514de365eca3bb4f7cab154f675666094bb8eeaf7de67
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    evidence_segment
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    e200b89b1e57a8da24a2266ef30b8aad36a99babccf0f7fa3f681ec08391ecc2
    Summary revision
    summary-a29d3f0105846a9b80cec78b485c4c64e3441c328be294121dba909e8d62c1bd
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    example_analysis
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    f6260d2bf4093c0527ebe664b8a91fc2d67cffbf1c6f1b768a7fcc4b73f5dba7
    Summary revision
    summary-a329564cc7f873164b1e78aa8960330a49fce7b912207e376002879bc10cd6d3
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    evidence_segment
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    bff33f33c026b1b525a82e037d8079bed2b43be04a605ccb01dd86b6b0a39fce
    Summary revision
    summary-a5abb4ec9efbd4fe22e3381fc83754ebddcc58aa042a7aed4ce083eb9615266d
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    example_analysis
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    bd4c46cccd89d42b96760bf5a6b71a7ffe6a70abc50dfb46bc15d6e5c498a19e
    Summary revision
    summary-b023bf8f6ec8af0ef1ac6c1491dbf2c94e5a66ac5df0d8574355762a6916cdc2
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    evidence_segment
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    c261c86a9b662cced9f18cca412438f13f498bf3bd9c85e29bdb1ee97f55a76e
    Summary revision
    summary-b1f0610d7c0d241531edc20a811db0a73157ec73a8a37e00b4feec07ef86ad78
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    evidence_segment
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    e1e2adcfa18a1786feae7860d2e6a2062f70157c6feb2de7b5fa38edbea6501a
    Summary revision
    summary-b557890d2044b571836c6a97858368a2fa0853368fbf0623d2b20a80b51e8bed
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    suite_analysis
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    e66161fa9c53159cd510de2f5553d3b04a3aa766d9f4a161e61efa0e2e17a9a8
    Summary revision
    summary-bcd1b037f6dd84a1664842b64aa9a6d1551a01516c3f04354f6b24a41cf11400
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    evidence_segment
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    8c58d644b38a7241e53bdea5421c44cea05e4981d85e4b04e7120b3b7e200497
    Summary revision
    summary-cf84c20e0d74a38daa082b6725a6385216ee52dfb8e7385a1b0e9760c05fa607
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    suite_analysis
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    e9baec703158cc277b20d0952a71cefd603600eca22b33649321f84ef201242d
    Summary revision
    summary-d67fc28580a48b26248c69ee6c567086daa8332a262042a3b098fa742275ed7b
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    evidence_segment
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    fdd1d2a14fd91f1a08395f784f3676bc4016aa9d13f35079ea2394c7e36bb65e
    Summary revision
    summary-d9349ad83816a8b741cbe63701a28e9d879699571f27e55f102c98c290ccfecf
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    example_analysis
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    070df11714136cad40c9fe4f3cc67dc39b9ee668c4ed4b69a1c9d00e18c30d5f
    Summary revision
    summary-d98ed06cab1aee0f24c32092455f4240e9d584e6574dc4c76f8ac427195d5cbe
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    suite_analysis
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    46ebd2dfd0c65479bb6b981c2d6eaab6c393072e51b36282a04a4bb08a10f16e
    Summary revision
    summary-e7edd9d9303f3bbba1d63913c21a675c82a101ab0fa99e49f063cb8c91e4188a
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    evidence_segment
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    3fb32a5a325a6a4c90df758a72d997d6382d49f8514349b9d839694a3102a465
    Summary revision
    summary-ea9173ed9fcb413435519f66b5e4658d4cb32b0cdb3c3df49017dfaf69723666
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    evidence_segment
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    c6828abaaac3faf5a08a88ca0d706f08892641466af66ad0e31cdd5d1e33f60a
    Summary revision
    summary-f2c4fba65b78dc2886fece1eacee10afc82f05962e355d7de42d596a56793dfa
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    evidence_segment
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    fdaad4670764982aa6cd2792c530d1f6b45ecb996d936ba9c1dcc2f443f75234
    Summary revision
    summary-f4c4690f78936a0bdbcee15606dacb50ec498c92dbe7143df5500a444666bef7
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    example_analysis
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    41b52989bea181f86c6993f5a4b0c1f921bf4e5225739fbace45ab2f4c42afe7
    Summary revision
    summary-fd8007ef17c6ac89ddc18b913cd87437a0c2bc846bfe4827506221ed0226bfc1
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis

Good at

Handles small project edits and straightforward passage questions well with thinking off, including tests that require recognizing when a passage does not contain the answer.

Evidence for this judgment
Everyday coding tasks · Thinking off
Tasks passed15 of 16 (93.8%)
Test coverage16 of 16 tasks scored
Explore these test results →

View this model’s answers, code and tool activity →

Reading without guessing · Thinking off
Tasks passed15 of 16 (93.8%)
Test coverage16 of 16 tasks scored
Explore these test results →

View this model’s answers, code and tool activity →

With thinking on, it performs well at calculations from a passage and keeping source-backed answers correct through challenges or source updates.

Evidence for this judgment
Calculating from a passage · Thinking on
Tasks passed7 of 7 (100.0%)
Test coverage7 of 7 tasks scored
Explore these test results →

View this model’s answers, code and tool activity →

Resisting incorrect corrections · Thinking on
Tasks passed10 of 12 (83.3%)
Test coverage12 of 12 tasks scored
Explore these test results →

View this model’s answers, code and tool activity →

Struggles with

Longer tasks with tools remain a poor fit even with thinking on. Puzzle scores are also middling, so extra reasoning should not be mistaken for dependable solutions.

Evidence for this judgment
Larger practical tasks · Thinking on
Average score45.5/100 · Mean task credit
Test coverage11 of 11 tasks scored
Task outcomes5 full credit · 0 partial · 6 no credit
Explore these test results →

View this model’s answers, code and tool activity →

Logic and number puzzles · Thinking on
Average score49.5/100 · Mean puzzle credit
Test coverage34 of 34 tasks scored
Task outcomes16 full credit · 1 partial · 17 no credit
Explore these test results →

View this model’s answers, code and tool activity →

Source-backed answers are a serious weakness with thinking off: it rarely passed the complete test of resisting unsupported challenges while updating correctly when the source changed.

Evidence for this judgment
Resisting incorrect corrections · Thinking off
Tasks passed1 of 12 (8.3%)
Test coverage12 of 12 tasks scored
Explore these test results →

View this model’s answers, code and tool activity →

Should you enable thinking?

Leave thinking off for small coding tasks and straightforward passage questions. It offers the better speed/quality balance here: thinking increased average task time, left coding success unchanged, and reduced passage-answer accuracy.

Evidence for this judgment
Everyday coding tasks · Thinking off versus on
Thinking off → on93.8% · Task pass rate → 93.8% · Task pass rate
Paired test coverage16 of 16 tasks compared in both modes
Tasks timed in both modes16 pairs
Score change with thinking onNo change
Average time change with thinking on15.5 seconds slower
Explore these test results →

View this model’s answers, code and tool activity →

Reading without guessing · Thinking off versus on
Thinking off → on93.8% · Exact-match accuracy → 81.3% · Exact-match accuracy
Paired test coverage16 of 16 tasks compared in both modes
Tasks timed in both modes16 pairs
Score change with thinking on-12.5 score points
Average time change with thinking on52.3 seconds slower
Explore these test results →

View this model’s answers, code and tool activity →

Enable thinking for calculations from passages and answers that must withstand challenges while respecting source updates. The substantial accuracy gains justify considering the longer wait; these are stronger reasons to enable it than routine coding.

Evidence for this judgment
Resisting incorrect corrections · Thinking off versus on
Thinking off → on8.3% · All-branches pass rate → 83.3% · All-branches pass rate
Paired test coverage12 of 12 tasks compared in both modes
Tasks timed in both modes12 pairs
Score change with thinking on+75.0 score points
Average time change with thinking on82.8 seconds slower
Explore these test results →

View this model’s answers, code and tool activity →

Calculating from a passage · Thinking off versus on
Thinking off → on57.1% · Numeric exact-match accuracy → 100.0% · Numeric exact-match accuracy
Paired test coverage7 of 7 tasks compared in both modes
Tasks timed in both modes7 pairs
Score change with thinking on+42.9 score points
Average time change with thinking on50.5 seconds slower
Explore these test results →

View this model’s answers, code and tool activity →

Compared with other models

With thinking off, small-coding success narrowly trails the other tested large MoE models. With thinking on, larger-task scores were below every eligible peer, with varying gaps. Compare these as task-specific results, not a general ranking.

Evidence for this judgment

Everyday coding tasks
Thinking off. Large · 20B and above · MoE (total parameters). Rank 7 of 7 in this recorded comparison.

Larger practical tasks
Thinking on. Large · 20B and above · MoE (total parameters). Rank 7 of 7 in this recorded comparison.

Everyday coding tasks · Thinking off
Tasks passed15 of 16 (93.8%)
Test coverage16 of 16 tasks scored
Explore these test results →

View this model’s answers, code and tool activity →

Larger practical tasks · Thinking on
Average score45.5/100 · Mean task credit
Test coverage11 of 11 tasks scored
Task outcomes5 full credit · 0 partial · 6 no credit
Explore these test results →

View this model’s answers, code and tool activity →

Everyday coding tasksThinking off · Large · 20B and above · MoE (total parameters)

Find information in a small project, edit files and fix bugs.

Task pass rate · 0–100% · higher is better
16 of 16 tasks scored for each model.

Gaps are relative to this model. Treat small gaps cautiously.

  1. =1 Gemma 4 26B-A4B25.2B total parameters100.0%
    1 task more passed
  2. =1 Gemma 4 26B-A4B QAT Q4_K_XL25.2B total parameters100.0%
    1 task more passed
  3. =1 Qwen3.6 28B-REAP20-A3B28.2B total parameters100.0%
    1 task more passed
  4. =1 Qwen3.6 29B REAP Opus distill28.9B total parameters100.0%
    1 task more passed
  5. =1 Qwen3.6 35B-A3B34.7B total parameters100.0%
    1 task more passed
  6. =1 Qwen3.8 Flash-Next (IQ3_XXS)176.9B total parameters100.0%
    1 task more passed
  7. #7 GLM-4.7-Flash REAP 23B-A3B23.0B total parameters93.8%
    This model

Several models reached full marks; this test cannot separate their top scores.

Other mode, this model only: thinking on · 93.8% · Task pass rate.

How this comparison works

Share of tasks that passed the recorded checks. Family comparisons show the labeled Instruct and reasoning versions. Other peer comparisons use the same requested thinking setting, not necessarily each model’s best mode. Small differences on these short tests may not hold on other tasks. Peer membership varies by test coverage and compatible settings.

MoE models use only part of their parameters for each token. This group uses total size; active counts are not included in this saved comparison.

Comparison saved with the 2026-10-12 assessment. Task-specific results.

Larger practical tasksThinking on · Large · 20B and above · MoE (total parameters)

Build small apps, organize information and investigate files or web pages.

Mean task credit · 0–100 points · higher is better
11 of 11 tasks scored for each model.

Gaps are relative to this model. Treat small gaps cautiously.

  1. #1 Qwen3.6 35B-A3B34.7B total parameters90.9/100
    45.5 points higher
  2. =2 Gemma 4 26B-A4B25.2B total parameters72.7/100
    27.3 points higher
  3. =2 Gemma 4 26B-A4B QAT Q4_K_XL25.2B total parameters72.7/100
    27.3 points higher
  4. =2 Qwen3.6 29B REAP Opus distill28.9B total parameters72.7/100
    27.3 points higher
  5. #5 Qwen3.8 Flash-Next (IQ3_XXS)176.9B total parameters63.6/100
    18.2 points higher
  6. #6 Qwen3.6 28B-REAP20-A3B28.2B total parameters54.5/100
    9.1 points higher
  7. #7 GLM-4.7-Flash REAP 23B-A3B23.0B total parameters45.5/100
    This model

Other mode, this model only: thinking off · 27.3/100 · Mean task credit.

How this comparison works

Average credit per task; partly correct results can earn partial credit. Family comparisons show the labeled Instruct and reasoning versions. Other peer comparisons use the same requested thinking setting, not necessarily each model’s best mode. Small differences on these short tests may not hold on other tasks. Peer membership varies by test coverage and compatible settings.

MoE models use only part of their parameters for each token. This group uses total size; active counts are not included in this saved comparison.

Comparison saved with the 2026-10-12 assessment. Task-specific results.

With thinking on, passage calculations tied the top score in this tested large MoE cohort. Puzzle performance exceeded Qwen3.6 29B REAP Opus distill but trailed the other five tested peers.

Evidence for this judgment

Calculating from a passage
Thinking on. Large · 20B and above · MoE (total parameters). Tied at rank 1 of 7 in this recorded comparison.

Logic and number puzzles
Thinking on. Large · 20B and above · MoE (total parameters). Rank 6 of 7 in this recorded comparison.

Calculating from a passage · Thinking on
Tasks passed7 of 7 (100.0%)
Test coverage7 of 7 tasks scored
Explore these test results →

View this model’s answers, code and tool activity →

Logic and number puzzles · Thinking on
Average score49.5/100 · Mean puzzle credit
Test coverage34 of 34 tasks scored
Task outcomes16 full credit · 1 partial · 17 no credit
Explore these test results →

View this model’s answers, code and tool activity →

Calculating from a passageThinking on · Large · 20B and above · MoE (total parameters)

Read a passage and count, compare or calculate using its facts.

Numeric exact-match accuracy · 0–100% · higher is better
7 of 7 tasks scored for each model.

Gaps are relative to this model. Treat small gaps cautiously.

  1. =1 GLM-4.7-Flash REAP 23B-A3B23.0B total parameters100.0%
    This model
  2. =1 Qwen3.6 28B-REAP20-A3B28.2B total parameters100.0%
    Same score
  3. =1 Qwen3.6 35B-A3B34.7B total parameters100.0%
    Same score
  4. =1 Qwen3.8 Flash-Next (IQ3_XXS)176.9B total parameters100.0%
    Same score
  5. =5 Gemma 4 26B-A4B QAT Q4_K_XL25.2B total parameters85.7%
    1 task fewer passed
  6. =5 Qwen3.6 29B REAP Opus distill28.9B total parameters85.7%
    1 task fewer passed
  7. #7 Gemma 4 26B-A4B25.2B total parameters71.4%
    2 tasks fewer passed

Several models reached full marks; this test cannot separate their top scores.

Other mode, this model only: thinking off · 57.1% · Numeric exact-match accuracy.

How this comparison works

Share of tasks that passed the recorded checks. Family comparisons show the labeled Instruct and reasoning versions. Other peer comparisons use the same requested thinking setting, not necessarily each model’s best mode. Small differences on these short tests may not hold on other tasks. Peer membership varies by test coverage and compatible settings.

MoE models use only part of their parameters for each token. This group uses total size; active counts are not included in this saved comparison.

Comparison saved with the 2026-10-12 assessment. Task-specific results.

Logic and number puzzlesThinking on · Large · 20B and above · MoE (total parameters)

Solve newly generated puzzles using arithmetic, deduction and planning.

Mean puzzle credit · 0–100 points · higher is better
34 of 34 tasks scored for each model.

Gaps are relative to this model. Treat small gaps cautiously.

  1. #1 Qwen3.8 Flash-Next (IQ3_XXS)176.9B total parameters85.3/100
    35.8 points higher
  2. #2 Gemma 4 26B-A4B25.2B total parameters79.4/100
    29.9 points higher
  3. #3 Gemma 4 26B-A4B QAT Q4_K_XL25.2B total parameters76.5/100
    27.0 points higher
  4. #4 Qwen3.6 35B-A3B34.7B total parameters69.8/100
    20.3 points higher
  5. #5 Qwen3.6 28B-REAP20-A3B28.2B total parameters55.1/100
    5.6 points higher
  6. #6 GLM-4.7-Flash REAP 23B-A3B23.0B total parameters49.5/100
    This model
  7. #7 Qwen3.6 29B REAP Opus distill28.9B total parameters45.0/100
    4.4 points lower

Other mode, this model only: thinking off · 27.3/100 · Mean puzzle credit.

How this comparison works

Average credit per task; partly correct results can earn partial credit. Family comparisons show the labeled Instruct and reasoning versions. Other peer comparisons use the same requested thinking setting, not necessarily each model’s best mode. Small differences on these short tests may not hold on other tasks. Peer membership varies by test coverage and compatible settings.

MoE models use only part of their parameters for each token. This group uses total size; active counts are not included in this saved comparison.

Comparison saved with the 2026-10-12 assessment. Task-specific results.

Worth knowing

Instruction-following and hard-problem banks each have one unscored parser-failure trial. Larger practical-task scores still omit cases requiring deferred subjective layout judging.

Evidence for this judgment

Source limitation
Some suite/condition results are incomplete or ineligible; their observed scores are previews.

Following exact instructions · Thinking on
Tasks passed15 of 22 (68.2%)
Test coverage22 of 23 tasks scored
Explore these test results →

View this model’s answers, code and tool activity →

Published hard problems · Thinking on
Average score31.3/100 · Mean answer credit
Test coverage10 of 11 tasks scored
Task outcomes3 full credit · 2 partial · 5 no credit
Explore these test results →

View this model’s answers, code and tool activity →

Two original parser failures remain unscored. The investigated parser bypass was not deployed because it lost the fixed reasoning-budget control. Diagnostic candidate answers and longer-budget replays are not benchmark scores. The original runtime log needed to validate recovery is no longer available; no recovered-answer claim is supported.

Evidence for this judgment

Source limitation
Two original parser failures remain unscored. The investigated parser bypass was not deployed because it lost the fixed reasoning-budget control. Diagnostic candidate answers and longer-budget replays are not benchmark scores. The original runtime log needed to validate recovery is no longer available; no recovered-answer claim is supported.

Publication redactions and withheld artifacts limit reader inspection. Full paper text is linked rather than reproduced; this does not establish that the model lacked it.

Evidence for this judgment

Source limitation
Some selected evidence has recorded publication redactions.

How to interpret these assessments and their limitations →

One weight format is recorded for this model. Additional tested formats will appear here when available.

What changed in these results

Two original parser failures remain unscored. The investigated parser bypass was not deployed because it lost the fixed reasoning-budget control. Diagnostic candidate answers and longer-budget replays are not benchmark scores. The original runtime log needed to validate recovery is no longer available; no recovered-answer claim is supported.

Thinking tradeoff

16/16 matched scored questions · 16/16 matched timed questions

Thinking offMean matched task credit93.8%
Thinking onMean matched task credit93.8%

Thinking on took 15.5 seconds more per matched timed question, on average.

All matched quality and timing measurements
Matched measurementRecorded result
Average credit, off → on93.8% → 93.8%
Mean paired credit change0.0 percentage points
Question outcomes1 improved · 14 unchanged · 1 worse
Mean added task time+15.5s
Mean task time, off → on16.2s → 31.7s
Median task time, off → on12.5s → 25.0s
Median of paired time changes+10.8s
Total added task time+248.3s
Ratio of summed times, on / off2.0×

Quality and timing can cover different subsets. Median paired change is calculated per question; it is not the difference between the two medians. Task time includes tools and grading.

Inspect the matched modes and their answers →
Inspect individual matched questions

Sampled repetitions

Repeated runs are a separate experiment and never add votes to the baseline score.

Thinking off · temperature 0.6

48/48 repeats scored · 46 full-credit repeats.

16/16 questions have every planned repeat scored. Of those, 15 earned full credit on every repeat.

Recorded repetition conditions
  • Seed 202 · requested off · verified
  • Seed 303 · requested off · verified
  • Seed 101 · requested off · verified

Everyday coding tasks: recorded outcomes

Find information in a small project, edit files and fix bugs.

15 full credit1 incorrect

Each segment counts tasks, not credit points. Partial credit varies by task.

Scoring and fixed question bank →

This model’s answers, code and tool activity

Select a question to read the original answer, tool calls and available code changes for this configuration and thinking setting.

1–16 of 16 matching questions · 16 in this version

  • Locate the Retry Limit

    The user asks where the project's retry-limit setting is defined and what value it holds. This exercises locating a named setting in code and reporting both its location and value.

    basic-T1 · primary
  • Find the Release Date

    The user asks for the release date mentioned in a project notes document. This exercises reading a specified file and extracting a particular fact rather than guessing from outside knowledge.

    basic-T2 · primary
  • Change the Retry Limit

    The user asks to change the project's retry limit to a specified value. This exercises finding the relevant setting and making a focused code edit rather than merely describing the change.

    basic-T3 · primary
  • Create an Exact One-Line File

    The user asks to create a text file containing exactly one supplied line. This exercises basic file creation and precise instruction following, including avoiding extra text in the file.

    basic-T4 · primary
  • Explain the Latest Commit

    The user asks what the most recent Git commit changed in the project. This exercises inspecting recorded changes and turning them into a clear explanation of what was modified.

    basic-T5 · primary
  • Count and Compare Python Files

    The user asks how many Python files are in the application folder and which is largest. This exercises identifying relevant files, counting them, and comparing their sizes.

    basic-T6 · primary
  • Add Readable Byte Sizes

    The user asks to add a function that converts byte counts into readable sizes and remove the related TODO comment. This exercises implementing a small utility and updating the surrounding code consistently.

    basic-T7 · primary
  • Collect TODO Comments

    The user asks to find every TODO comment in the Python code and append each to the project's task list on a separate line. This combines searching across files with collecting text into an existing document.

    basic-T8 · primary
  • Fix Code Behind a Failing Test

    The user asks to investigate a failing test and fix the application code without changing the test. This exercises diagnosing a bug while respecting an explicit limit on what may be edited.

    basic-H1 · primary
  • Rename a Function Throughout

    The user asks to rename a network function and update every place in the project that uses it. This exercises tracking references across files and making a coordinated change rather than editing only the definition.

    basic-H2 · primary
  • Find the Proxy Settings

    The user asks to find a proxy configuration file somewhere under the project's parent folder and report its host and port. This exercises searching beyond the project folder and reading configuration values.

    basic-H3 · primary
  • Locate an Error in a Log

    The user asks which error code appears in a long event log and on which line. This exercises finding a specific entry in a large file and reporting its precise location.

    basic-H4 · primary
  • Append a Final Task

    The user asks to append a supplied release-related task as the final line of an existing task list. This exercises preserving existing content while adding exact text in the requested position.

    basic-H5 · primary
  • Calculate Total Retry Waiting

    The user asks for the total time a network function spends sleeping when all attempts fail, worked out from the code. This exercises following retry logic and adding the delays along that failure path.

    basic-H6 · primary
  • Document Every Command-Line Option

    The user asks for a project readme listing every command-line option with its help text. This exercises discovering the program's available options and transferring that information into complete, source-grounded documentation.

    basic-H7 · primary
  • Undo a Commit by Editing

    The user asks to undo the latest Git commit's change by editing the file directly, without using Git to make changes. This exercises understanding a previous edit and reversing it under a method constraint.

    basic-H8 · primary
Filters change this list, not the fixed scoring denominator. Search currently covers question IDs, titles and available task explanations. Focus a control to load prompt/outcome search where this edition provides it.

Suggested comparisons

These are starting points for inspection, not claims that one setup is better. Runtime and placement differences remain visible.

Thinking on versus off

Verified requested on/off conditions of the same configuration, matched on the recorded test protocol.

Requested thinking on · Complete compared coverage

Compare these configurations →

Selection rule and evidence IDsPolicy comparisons-v3 · Template verified-thinking-pair
Facts: paired-0edd076efaff4eacacaf386c
Matching candidate set: paired-0edd076efaff4eacacaf386c

Gemma 4 26B-A4B QAT Q4_K_XL

Another checkpoint in the same total-parameter band and architecture category, with matching task controls.

Requested thinking off · Complete compared coverage

Compare these configurations →

Selection rule and evidence IDsPolicy comparisons-v3 · Template same-parameter-architecture-matching-controls
Facts: fact-47ad91563613ac587b7cf8d6, fact-b02c9416cc8ad504bf20376d
Matching candidate set: fact-b02c9416cc8ad504bf20376d, fact-13b07e4fd98f9401f28d5b10, fact-16816c9c04532a86f188323f, fact-9c25818e1688f1a4f03239a9, fact-5ae8ac173573895133028987, fact-fd3890f4fbd1383d2af80d72, fact-bfc465187e0c4b64d3e0faee, fact-84b68ee522c794052dbb13dd, fact-543885d1abe7569641164958, fact-d3eb63c2e0bc62fa106a3ff4, fact-3ca95ea92b5d2c9ac3e39bf6, fact-3bed0f728335765f1f64dc04, fact-f7565dbc26202571f4b7c51e, fact-2495f2a50aa1e8662cf535ad

Tested weights

UD-Q4_K_XL · 14.24 GB

unsloth · recorded source

GLM-4.7-Flash-REAP-23B-A3B-UD-Q4_K_XL.gguf · Exact GGUF file →Historical first-MiB hash only; not a full-file identity.

Explore the answers

Choose a suite to inspect its exact available questions, references and model answers.