AgentBench / results
← All models

Maple Preview 20B-A1B TQ2_0-head-Q4_K

1 tested weight format · Explore results, then inspect the answers.

Choose a tested configuration

Get this tested model

Unknown · 5.9 GB download

Links follow the selected quant and configuration.

16 not yet recorded · setup comparability unverified

Setup, memory & provenance · Unknown

Unknown · 5.9 GB of weights · maple_cpu · context 16384 · GPU layers unrecorded

Large · 20B and above · MoE · 20.2B total · Active parameter count not recorded

Memory fit has not been verified for this configuration.

pending

Execution details are incomplete. This configuration is not eligible for ranking.

Recorded settings and thinking verification

Temperature 0 · seed 42 · output limit 4096 · reasoning effort unrecorded

RAM labels describe the test computer, not this model’s memory requirement. Speed comparisons keep the 32 GB and 128 GB runs separate.

Runtime build: unrecorded · Local · test machine with 32 GB RAM · concurrency: 1

Thinking status: native reasoning · probe 3 · scope Profile-bound diagnostic confirms native reasoning; separate checkpoint, no verified off condition..

Requested off does not prove an absence of reasoning. Saved checks do not establish unrecorded historical template or build details.

Overall across tasks

0–100 / 100

Nine categories, equally weighted · 0/9 eligible

Possible score range with unscored tasks receiving zero to full credit. Incomplete results remain unranked; this is not a confidence interval. Quality only; speed is separate. How the index works →

What does it do well?

Select a category to explore the answers. Bars show what happened on every planned task. Incorrect answers and failures to finish both earn zero; technical problems and untested tasks stay unscored.

Exact scores and task times by suite

Each suite has its own metric and fixed task bank. The balanced index weights categories equally; individual scores and evidence remain available below.

Test suiteThinking / Reasoning versionDetails
Everyday coding tasksTask pass rateNot scored0/16 scored · PreviewNo measured time
Larger practical tasksMean task creditNot scored0/11 scored · PreviewNo measured time
Logic and number puzzlesMean puzzle creditNot scored0/34 scored · PreviewNo measured time
Published hard problemsMean answer creditNot scored0/11 scored · PreviewNo measured time
Following exact instructions · original campaignStrict prompt complianceNot scored0/23 scored · PreviewNo measured time
Reading without guessingExact-match accuracyNot scored0/16 scored · PreviewNo measured time
Calculating from a passageNumeric exact-match accuracyNot scored0/7 scored · PreviewNo measured time
Reading research papersAnswer token F1Not scored0/8 scored · PreviewNo measured time
Resisting incorrect correctionsAll-branches pass rateNot scored0/12 scored · PreviewNo measured time
Following exact instructions · 128 GB campaignStrict prompt complianceNot planned

No reviewed summary yet. The charts show recorded benchmark results.

One weight format is recorded for this model. Additional tested formats will appear here when available.

Thinking tradeoff

No verified on/off comparison is available for this configuration and test suite. Requested modes alone do not establish a controlled thinking comparison.

Sampled repetitions

Repeated runs are a separate experiment and never add votes to the baseline score.

Thinking / Reasoning version · temperature 0.6

0/48 repeats scored · 0 full-credit repeats.

0/16 questions have every planned repeat scored. Of those, 0 earned full credit on every repeat.

Incomplete repetition coverage; unresolved questions are not classified as passing all repeats.

Recorded repetition conditions
  • Seed 303 · requested on · native reasoning
  • Seed 101 · requested on · native reasoning
  • Seed 202 · requested on · native reasoning

Everyday coding tasks: recorded outcomes

Find information in a small project, edit files and fix bugs.

0 full credit · 0 partial credit · 0 zero credit

16 pending

Ranking unavailable: incomplete coverage, incompatible or uncertain cohort.

Scoring and fixed question bank →

This model’s answers, code and tool activity

Select a question to read the original answer, tool calls and available code changes for this configuration and thinking setting.

1–16 of 16 matching questions · 16 in this version

  • Locate the Retry Limit

    The user asks where the project's retry-limit setting is defined and what value it holds. This exercises locating a named setting in code and reporting both its location and value.

    basic-T1 · primary
  • Find the Release Date

    The user asks for the release date mentioned in a project notes document. This exercises reading a specified file and extracting a particular fact rather than guessing from outside knowledge.

    basic-T2 · primary
  • Change the Retry Limit

    The user asks to change the project's retry limit to a specified value. This exercises finding the relevant setting and making a focused code edit rather than merely describing the change.

    basic-T3 · primary
  • Create an Exact One-Line File

    The user asks to create a text file containing exactly one supplied line. This exercises basic file creation and precise instruction following, including avoiding extra text in the file.

    basic-T4 · primary
  • Explain the Latest Commit

    The user asks what the most recent Git commit changed in the project. This exercises inspecting recorded changes and turning them into a clear explanation of what was modified.

    basic-T5 · primary
  • Count and Compare Python Files

    The user asks how many Python files are in the application folder and which is largest. This exercises identifying relevant files, counting them, and comparing their sizes.

    basic-T6 · primary
  • Add Readable Byte Sizes

    The user asks to add a function that converts byte counts into readable sizes and remove the related TODO comment. This exercises implementing a small utility and updating the surrounding code consistently.

    basic-T7 · primary
  • Collect TODO Comments

    The user asks to find every TODO comment in the Python code and append each to the project's task list on a separate line. This combines searching across files with collecting text into an existing document.

    basic-T8 · primary
  • Fix Code Behind a Failing Test

    The user asks to investigate a failing test and fix the application code without changing the test. This exercises diagnosing a bug while respecting an explicit limit on what may be edited.

    basic-H1 · primary
  • Rename a Function Throughout

    The user asks to rename a network function and update every place in the project that uses it. This exercises tracking references across files and making a coordinated change rather than editing only the definition.

    basic-H2 · primary
  • Find the Proxy Settings

    The user asks to find a proxy configuration file somewhere under the project's parent folder and report its host and port. This exercises searching beyond the project folder and reading configuration values.

    basic-H3 · primary
  • Locate an Error in a Log

    The user asks which error code appears in a long event log and on which line. This exercises finding a specific entry in a large file and reporting its precise location.

    basic-H4 · primary
  • Append a Final Task

    The user asks to append a supplied release-related task as the final line of an existing task list. This exercises preserving existing content while adding exact text in the requested position.

    basic-H5 · primary
  • Calculate Total Retry Waiting

    The user asks for the total time a network function spends sleeping when all attempts fail, worked out from the code. This exercises following retry logic and adding the delays along that failure path.

    basic-H6 · primary
  • Document Every Command-Line Option

    The user asks for a project readme listing every command-line option with its help text. This exercises discovering the program's available options and transferring that information into complete, source-grounded documentation.

    basic-H7 · primary
  • Undo a Commit by Editing

    The user asks to undo the latest Git commit's change by editing the file directly, without using Git to make changes. This exercises understanding a previous edit and reversing it under a method constraint.

    basic-H8 · primary
Filters change this list, not the fixed scoring denominator. Search currently covers question IDs, titles and available task explanations. Focus a control to load prompt/outcome search where this edition provides it.

Suggested comparisons

These are starting points for inspection, not claims that one setup is better. Runtime and placement differences remain visible.

GLM-4.7-Flash REAP 23B-A3B

Another checkpoint in the same total-parameter band and architecture category, with matching task controls.

Requested thinking on · Exploratory: incomplete or uncertain evidence

Compare these configurations →

Selection rule and evidence IDsPolicy comparisons-v3 · Template same-parameter-architecture-matching-controls
Facts: fact-24e468344d64cb03badda736, fact-513cdcd418215fb18de91eaf
Matching candidate set: fact-513cdcd418215fb18de91eaf, fact-c07386361967c222d8028664, fact-483531924d0e765052461c57, fact-eab8e02b2ca6f6125554960e, fact-715b4dac385ebc58266864e4, fact-e8904ea75031d6ca51c8c950, fact-323b97d3fdf7355dc2770c66, fact-293c9f59094b11858da40443, fact-f173b9794ef7b0017910a9bd, fact-c42b6bb6242e9fbbcb40000c, fact-85df5b9585f4e6e43ea084c4, fact-e33976d73a46b28357f03760, fact-7aafa6cbb04481beb867a2e4, fact-ea0d7c942a224d49dc767879, fact-bc60b4f12cd6927a928b8266

Tested weights

Unknown · 5.9 GB

deepgrove · recorded source

maple-preview-TQ2_0-head-Q4_K.gguf · Exact GGUF file →Historical first-MiB hash only; not a full-file identity.

Explore the answers

Choose a suite to inspect its exact available questions, references and model answers.