AgentBench / results
← All models

Qwen3.6 35B-A3B

1 tested weight format · Explore results, then inspect the answers.

Choose a tested configuration

Get this tested model

Q4_K_M · 20.42 GB download

Links follow the selected quant and configuration.

Setup, memory & provenance · Q4_K_M

Q4_K_M · 20.42 GB of weights · rocm · context 32768 · GPU layers 99

Large · 20B and above · MoE · 34.7B total · Active parameter count not recorded

Memory fit has not been verified for this configuration.

completed

Recorded settings and thinking verification

Temperature 0 · seed 42 · output limit 4096 · reasoning effort unrecorded

RAM labels describe the test computer, not this model’s memory requirement. Speed comparisons keep the 32 GB and 128 GB runs separate.

Runtime build: unrecorded · Local · test machine with 32 GB RAM · concurrency: 1

Thinking status: verified · probe 1 · scope Saved profile-level probe; exact historical template/build scope is not fully recorded..

Requested off does not prove an absence of reasoning. Saved checks do not establish unrecorded historical template or build details.

Overall across tasks

80.6 / 100

Nine categories, equally weighted · 9/9 eligible

Complete coverage for this setup. Quality only; speed is separate. How the index works →

What does it do well?

Select a category to explore the answers. Bars show what happened on every planned task. Incorrect answers and failures to finish both earn zero; technical problems and untested tasks stay unscored.

Exact scores and task times by suite

Each suite has its own metric and fixed task bank. The balanced index weights categories equally; individual scores and evidence remain available below.

Test suiteThinking onDetails
Everyday coding tasksTask pass rate
Pass rate
16/16 · 100%
Answers completed
16/16 · 100%
Correct / completed
16/16 · 100%
16 full credit
16/16 scored17.9s median task time · 16 measured
Larger practical tasksMean task credit
Average credit
90.9%
Full-credit rate
10/11 · 91%
Answers completed
11/11 · 100%
Full credit / completed
10/11 · 91%
10 full credit1 incorrect
11/11 scored59.4s median task time · 11 measured
Logic and number puzzlesMean puzzle credit
Average credit
69.8%
Full-credit rate
23/34 · 68%
Answers completed
34/34 · 100%
Full credit / completed
23/34 · 68%
23 full credit2 partial credit9 incorrect
34/34 scored85.1s median task time · 34 measured
Published hard problemsMean answer credit
Average credit
63.7%
Full-credit rate
6/11 · 55%
Answers completed
11/11 · 100%
Full credit / completed
6/11 · 55%
6 full credit3 partial credit2 incorrect
11/11 scored112.3s median task time · 11 measured
Following exact instructions · original campaignStrict prompt compliance
Pass rate
20/23 · 87%
Answers completed
23/23 · 100%
Correct / completed
20/23 · 87%
20 full credit3 incorrect
23/23 scored90.1s median task time · 23 measured
Reading without guessingExact-match accuracy
Pass rate
15/16 · 94%
Answers completed
16/16 · 100%
Correct / completed
15/16 · 94%
15 full credit1 incorrect
16/16 scored31.8s median task time · 16 measured
Calculating from a passageNumeric exact-match accuracy
Pass rate
7/7 · 100%
Answers completed
7/7 · 100%
Correct / completed
7/7 · 100%
7 full credit
7/7 scored38.3s median task time · 7 measured
Reading research papersAnswer token F1
Average credit
45.5%
Full-credit rate
0/8 · 0%
Answers completed
8/8 · 100%
Full credit / completed
0/8 · 0%
8 partial credit
8/8 scored66.4s median task time · 8 measured
Resisting incorrect correctionsAll-branches pass rate
Pass rate
9/12 · 75%
Answers completed
12/12 · 100%
Correct / completed
9/12 · 75%
9 full credit3 incorrect
12/12 scored78.1s median task time · 12 measured
Following exact instructions · 128 GB campaignStrict prompt complianceNot planned

Model analysis

This analysis covers this configuration across its recorded thinking conditions and test suites.

Use this configuration for small project edits and bug fixes; with thinking enabled, it also completed most larger practical tasks. Research-paper question answering remains a substantial weakness, so check its answers against the paper. For everyday coding, leave thinking off: it finished sooner without sacrificing task success in these runs. Enable thinking selectively for longer tool-based work, where the quality gain justified the small average delay.

Evidence for this judgment
Everyday coding tasks · Thinking off
Tasks passed16 of 16 (100.0%)
Test coverage16 of 16 tasks scored
Explore these test results →

View this model’s answers, code and tool activity →

Everyday coding tasks · Thinking off versus on
Thinking off → on100.0% · Task pass rate → 100.0% · Task pass rate
Paired test coverage16 of 16 tasks compared in both modes
Tasks timed in both modes16 pairs
Score change with thinking onNo change
Average time change with thinking on7.2 seconds slower
Explore these test results →

View this model’s answers, code and tool activity →

Larger practical tasks · Thinking on
Average score90.9/100 · Mean task credit
Test coverage11 of 11 tasks scored
Task outcomes10 full credit · 0 partial · 1 no credit
Explore these test results →

View this model’s answers, code and tool activity →

Larger practical tasks · Thinking off versus on
Thinking off → on54.5/100 · Mean task credit → 90.9/100 · Mean task credit
Paired test coverage11 of 11 tasks compared in both modes
Tasks timed in both modes11 pairs
Score change with thinking on+36.4 score points
Average time change with thinking on15.0 seconds slower
Explore these test results →

View this model’s answers, code and tool activity →

Reading research papers · Thinking on
Average score45.5/100 · Answer token F1
Test coverage8 of 8 tasks scored
Task outcomes0 full credit · 8 partial · 0 no credit
Explore these test results →

View this model’s answers, code and tool activity →

Original analysis generated by GPT Astra · · Edited by Codex; agent reviewed by Codex · publication authorized by user

About this summary

Codex reviewed this assessment against a newer evidence edition. The original analyst, generation date and source draft remain recorded separately from the editorial revision.

Analyst provider
openai
Generation route
Codex CLI · codex-cli 0.162.1 · ChatGPT account
Requested model
gpt-6-astra
Returned model
Not supplied; identity is recorded from the request only.
Exact provider snapshot
Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
Reasoning effort
high
Prompt version
model-summary-reader-v6
Generation time
2026-10-12T05:44:00.125247Z
Review time
2026-10-22T05:55:43.644970+00:00
Evidence reviewer
Codex (agent)
Publication authorization
User · 2026-10-22T05:55:43.625712+00:00 · Go ahead and complete the remaining work. Spin up agents: luna, terra, sol, astra, as needed to get it done. Narrative summaries: these are the astra generated summaries? Go ahead and get those completed as well. Once all of this is done, you may push the completed result.
Originating evidence edition
dataset-b1aa28e61ea9ce402d5617e636622c22565093f8849fd66537b5f4353d228521
Analysis input hash
c141b11ef56540730c7e5945b65b3f665bb53079a2b649b4cc0c206bf8dd4a53
Original analysis input hash
b5d677aef4fb377367bc7e8c766ef16477c14989c17d71f422120b40b1e98ec9
Editorial evidence edition
dataset-5a6f96ec56c3d240cc42fa23147c1495da1be71f3ef0722c0e5f8c4f5e126a83
Original summary
summary-5da4860f8048390d2d107f896986ac3100b4051797ff7e01748ae59716a38b50
Summary revision
summary-fb7dc3f39aee5aacfd4987c6358ff7870ab093fecc8bd258713f731b6d806357

Generation and editorial authorship remain attached to this revision. Changing the default generator does not change this attribution.

Contributing analyses (34)
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    suite_analysis
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    b6659c89e307deb0f9cae6e4154a71b25dba088dc33822b9530e41dd8da810df
    Summary revision
    summary-0252c09c1c96f12b98da90104d20ae8409b75331a006dde555dd5e97b0737015
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    evidence_segment
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    2fb51d52554c4ba7424cc53b0454416a3f537534b5e62d7d1f41ef81a8010446
    Summary revision
    summary-071865402266707b74e6f1ddd72d88361ea2b06071eeef206210799a6f83c2eb
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    evidence_segment
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    c22f6a658fd4f7ec599d236a023f1baaf11ba653f761625a1b72a4def5db1943
    Summary revision
    summary-3d761a4ed1f742cdbc3296fd782bf398f2f001e630e3df16b572cda99b98886d
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    evidence_segment
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    6af3246b6b9c95f666061d8cf440e968149824335e1e6c65761d5a68a25ca296
    Summary revision
    summary-3ee44eadffb6b887879f1ceeba358c81ea39db05fa8bab94ff2024ddc11b1915
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    evidence_segment
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    323c9ead5106a0c50bb74cee85da1b43a2180820404a327f84b3c1b096e66ff4
    Summary revision
    summary-460e44cf0edf8cd97bf8ebec2d8ecc25bd0a7b4011d366dcde7c50b7376f3ce7
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    example_analysis
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    3fc760f25bdf46e7c7d10ad54fa99ca50f5a98d9f25c0917f440e03539d8aad2
    Summary revision
    summary-4b5d82b45457027c8019ff55ecf3b221fc7972cb3900b7fd10e73c6d495f23f8
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    suite_analysis
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    b7dd121c6d3fcad46e298dae4849fff5ae293369b1856cdeaee7b7910fbb6bd5
    Summary revision
    summary-4c03bf82719c338131e2859739f198e83c293e0387a5e1c4c9c27205918d974c
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    evidence_segment
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    625941db6a218e10dcb7b870b154f28dbda486a4e9395b88e98518dbbc85f685
    Summary revision
    summary-4ed76cb7e8e7ffdc25e68be17881ef5e97f3b81990d725ac26dd2a6987c1d01e
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    evidence_segment
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    3a5c80c913c04c10822e03a0668869364752fcc206acd204391e38be45d62f9a
    Summary revision
    summary-58d9e05e03dd2d812657662a1c7bff4fd67fbdd81d2a5b5a6d8f40b93fb56a9b
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    suite_analysis
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    3785a45c61905209f97383e2b8f6d0330ecd00050d19435b6c8073d4bce12637
    Summary revision
    summary-5fdbebcc5b2485220c14274a2bd1cdb0a6b34b31bcb3597f89fdb2289f65e6d8
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    evidence_segment
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    aac4a28a21afb59f89645cc3e4e2b963ad50b0cdd5851a90ea0f9cd6ca5ad4d3
    Summary revision
    summary-693abe1caabb177e444144621be796f769d3e663e3daa04ace85bde5c87d3405
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    suite_analysis
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    b03c3444f48df99b0c6947b2a4ffaf21ed7dbffabed232e4c00fa084fbf49897
    Summary revision
    summary-6a0f915bc00f8063b812d6c146e551bf0063147fa13cee0ae7a612c1d6c283f2
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    subject_synthesis
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    453cd79d625fcbe674f30113249191906d4e00efc6ace32f24b2e378a894387e
    Summary revision
    summary-70432c3301a90264fd49721f4dbaa183e63b1b68f6c5cc7e3432865b0529795c
    Input summary revisions
    summary-0252c09c1c96f12b98da90104d20ae8409b75331a006dde555dd5e97b0737015, summary-4c03bf82719c338131e2859739f198e83c293e0387a5e1c4c9c27205918d974c, summary-5fdbebcc5b2485220c14274a2bd1cdb0a6b34b31bcb3597f89fdb2289f65e6d8, summary-6a0f915bc00f8063b812d6c146e551bf0063147fa13cee0ae7a612c1d6c283f2, summary-7ed50fb0eded3b74280adbdd6420da43d5f05f0f1538d11ab8c21b266d61941d, summary-aecd0f976186536a6459565acf5114d182418fc0299d05c6494b811b2aed87bc, summary-b052c131688d18d124329cf3cb405526f80c50aab2821e011e692b010772b0a4, summary-d66d5dcdd4de17716eff5fdabb76ed1072aecbaf93aab945b7498d94f6518dd8, summary-e0ad435c9cfc2b2a51a908fa18e2abf40af42a8ec64d718b666f8b73cdc5988a
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    evidence_segment
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    c60e5f9a5d1be349dc0e554ec91cb134ef4e4fbe0f2dd7e8c9c64c7f0f4eb5e5
    Summary revision
    summary-7479b2ef51ef1f633fb69b0bc8cf680dc8facf8368ccc35a5b064cf88e58a709
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    evidence_segment
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    a0dae8971190af67abbeb50dad8c4f5ec7b591efbcec22c1de28daaf6aad4d05
    Summary revision
    summary-75fd29ea48b5f911c3596cc9ea466d725e28e691f0fddd15028ee024c345e183
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    suite_analysis
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    130fa07030a6b9729f4f1dbe52652d4f5bb3552bea57ef021c4c5ce6a7db3a7e
    Summary revision
    summary-7ed50fb0eded3b74280adbdd6420da43d5f05f0f1538d11ab8c21b266d61941d
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    evidence_segment
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    f2509a89e9a9bee08d0ddfa54b830e05287ea0e492e92f0ff0f4395f545f1de1
    Summary revision
    summary-82bd0226a8216cc445a1a2302d710173f5ad0b833858e42a3e1903a04c963c7e
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    evidence_segment
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    ad650623b1de5c8bba612201a712546fa28110b124b339fd60865bcfe81c40c2
    Summary revision
    summary-88901484ad3293810c88578385e945f4c22344294e786103fdb56b2e7fea1db9
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    evidence_segment
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    e6cf074bf7d9875e819c60b237d66eaae097d7471dbe77c129315d453e8df447
    Summary revision
    summary-8b22fe15259faf904b8496285fddda5155c941e7f58704db5d197220fb901753
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    evidence_segment
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    45a189a0beef5ffe967d40d730c4f88e9d9443ca7307b9042901bc77abc0fec5
    Summary revision
    summary-9d3db122af781f263a93f12c39a29960c53ae0ed12fa215bc243b583949209f4
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    evidence_segment
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    3eab2d2688e1f671635aae468b7cc03b434632782276bb5239c082144e082fe6
    Summary revision
    summary-a5f98ca132fbdc086fd75591baf48cc47e479e609b284ffa8af85cade58727fa
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    evidence_segment
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    acbfa4914ca419693026b53ae1caa97f6fd3534643cfb8ddcdef9b73df4fb407
    Summary revision
    summary-a62b4438640bdf1f69c208f0dd501925a06612e7cd9e9d3b8c1bb8ba34796d80
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    example_analysis
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    7a490b2748b0adf8efeace27ed5d61e43339e4bc45b365e3625168e40cbc3339
    Summary revision
    summary-abc0278eb03b3a3032f88df1b6519cb0d11ea3cb8ccc9aa9700b749962a21261
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    suite_analysis
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    9b54091dc9ddcdd1a3fef1ef708585bbfd459134fa1e7675f240a5f81fe8f3a5
    Summary revision
    summary-aecd0f976186536a6459565acf5114d182418fc0299d05c6494b811b2aed87bc
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    suite_analysis
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    e89c262765ba872fe5daa58854bc2e4390e8ab0353cfec526210c137e3df1ad2
    Summary revision
    summary-b052c131688d18d124329cf3cb405526f80c50aab2821e011e692b010772b0a4
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    evidence_segment
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    f3c5f098ee2c143419dde92d4df8f59e9c8c04e8f609017268cd1a8a1dd9ebd1
    Summary revision
    summary-b081ae35d4d283b5742829a2c1a5e7d539435456402158aa728acdbdeb07469a
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    evidence_segment
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    d16a7361898b81e766bc995315907a572aec2f73249f52f1c9c10ed57611d834
    Summary revision
    summary-b8015181c83d39312408736288c0ee53353a3b2c79ab13825b701aec60d5e1e7
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    evidence_segment
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    8cc161a13444dd89b955286dad32ee42a0bf85b2c36c009e78bb42ea522b095d
    Summary revision
    summary-c006362ffc87a4eff01df58440f2cf7e3c54a6956708017ea699b631068f6018
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    evidence_segment
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    6118deaf0252a866a4135590d7428a80d0a27f695b2ea85c9fd8704a3bc0034b
    Summary revision
    summary-d3203b892ba3eb63f5bab9bb43959bbfdebd662b99fcdc2e56c4d615ec3c9e18
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    evidence_segment
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    28ea8173487c387d0100715e08f658406a19592f4976ede397eea93779def11b
    Summary revision
    summary-d629c0f4351f9355fd5251c9b3c3856ff85d75cb937b2edfeeb5def86892f7f9
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    suite_analysis
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    5fc79ffb31e188c220ee5d4aeb552af3b30339be0c1ce085d61b284db892de5a
    Summary revision
    summary-d66d5dcdd4de17716eff5fdabb76ed1072aecbaf93aab945b7498d94f6518dd8
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    evidence_segment
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    4e07806c4f3040d54bfe285228a4109a5ae95648ddd332376cdf97eee5b2e26c
    Summary revision
    summary-dd5849dbf0006791235e55bce93e47961350f08a9b45674ee6a4fef76adb7344
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    suite_synthesis
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    bf2df2888b2b17142fb9ccba58ebfe8e0b37d21d94134ab2459a8c871af992ae
    Summary revision
    summary-e0ad435c9cfc2b2a51a908fa18e2abf40af42a8ec64d718b666f8b73cdc5988a
    Input summary revisions
    summary-071865402266707b74e6f1ddd72d88361ea2b06071eeef206210799a6f83c2eb, summary-3d761a4ed1f742cdbc3296fd782bf398f2f001e630e3df16b572cda99b98886d, summary-3ee44eadffb6b887879f1ceeba358c81ea39db05fa8bab94ff2024ddc11b1915, summary-460e44cf0edf8cd97bf8ebec2d8ecc25bd0a7b4011d366dcde7c50b7376f3ce7, summary-4b5d82b45457027c8019ff55ecf3b221fc7972cb3900b7fd10e73c6d495f23f8, summary-4ed76cb7e8e7ffdc25e68be17881ef5e97f3b81990d725ac26dd2a6987c1d01e, summary-58d9e05e03dd2d812657662a1c7bff4fd67fbdd81d2a5b5a6d8f40b93fb56a9b, summary-693abe1caabb177e444144621be796f769d3e663e3daa04ace85bde5c87d3405, summary-7479b2ef51ef1f633fb69b0bc8cf680dc8facf8368ccc35a5b064cf88e58a709, summary-75fd29ea48b5f911c3596cc9ea466d725e28e691f0fddd15028ee024c345e183, summary-82bd0226a8216cc445a1a2302d710173f5ad0b833858e42a3e1903a04c963c7e, summary-88901484ad3293810c88578385e945f4c22344294e786103fdb56b2e7fea1db9, summary-8b22fe15259faf904b8496285fddda5155c941e7f58704db5d197220fb901753, summary-9d3db122af781f263a93f12c39a29960c53ae0ed12fa215bc243b583949209f4, summary-a5f98ca132fbdc086fd75591baf48cc47e479e609b284ffa8af85cade58727fa, summary-a62b4438640bdf1f69c208f0dd501925a06612e7cd9e9d3b8c1bb8ba34796d80, summary-abc0278eb03b3a3032f88df1b6519cb0d11ea3cb8ccc9aa9700b749962a21261, summary-b081ae35d4d283b5742829a2c1a5e7d539435456402158aa728acdbdeb07469a, summary-b8015181c83d39312408736288c0ee53353a3b2c79ab13825b701aec60d5e1e7, summary-c006362ffc87a4eff01df58440f2cf7e3c54a6956708017ea699b631068f6018, summary-d3203b892ba3eb63f5bab9bb43959bbfdebd662b99fcdc2e56c4d615ec3c9e18, summary-d629c0f4351f9355fd5251c9b3c3856ff85d75cb937b2edfeeb5def86892f7f9, summary-dd5849dbf0006791235e55bce93e47961350f08a9b45674ee6a4fef76adb7344, summary-efe8a882e084e67117a5599a94e6a7b904625b812dda9f3d8f3acb4ea43b5a19
  • GPT Astra ·
    Analysis stage
    evidence_segment
    Requested / returned model
    gpt-6-astra / Not supplied
    Exact provider snapshot
    Exact provider snapshot not supplied.
    Reasoning effort
    high
    Prompt version
    model-summary-v3
    Analysis input hash
    8a6ea103e6dec876a4292ba1eb4e0cf04f78d168d2041fcfc3c48d692bd1557e
    Summary revision
    summary-efe8a882e084e67117a5599a94e6a7b904625b812dda9f3d8f3acb4ea43b5a19
    Input summary revisions
    Direct evidence analysis

Good at

Handles small project edits and bug fixes well. Every repeated trial succeeded in both thinking modes, although these runs reused the same prompts rather than testing differently worded requests.

Evidence for this judgment
Everyday coding tasks · Thinking off · sampled repetitions
Repetitions earning full credit48 repetitions
Repetitions scored48 repetitions
Repetitions planned48 repetitions
Questions with all repetitions scored16 questions
Distinct questions planned16 questions
Explore these test results →

View this model’s answers, code and tool activity →

Everyday coding tasks · Thinking on · sampled repetitions
Repetitions earning full credit48 repetitions
Repetitions scored48 repetitions
Repetitions planned48 repetitions
Questions with all repetitions scored16 questions
Distinct questions planned16 questions
Explore these test results →

View this model’s answers, code and tool activity →

With thinking enabled, it completed most larger practical tasks, including work involving apps, files and information gathering. It also answered passage questions accurately, including tests where the passage contained no answer.

Evidence for this judgment
Larger practical tasks · Thinking on
Average score90.9/100 · Mean task credit
Test coverage11 of 11 tasks scored
Task outcomes10 full credit · 0 partial · 1 no credit
Explore these test results →

View this model’s answers, code and tool activity →

Reading without guessing · Thinking on
Tasks passed15 of 16 (93.8%)
Test coverage16 of 16 tasks scored
Explore these test results →

View this model’s answers, code and tool activity →

Struggles with

Research-paper question answering is a major weakness, especially with thinking off. Thinking improves answer matching but leaves substantial errors; check the answer and supporting paragraphs rather than trusting fluent output.

Evidence for this judgment
Reading research papers · Thinking off
Average score0.0/100 · Answer token F1
Test coverage8 of 8 tasks scored
Task outcomes0 full credit · 0 partial · 8 no credit
Explore these test results →

View this model’s answers, code and tool activity →

Reading research papers · Thinking on
Average score45.5/100 · Answer token F1
Test coverage8 of 8 tasks scored
Task outcomes0 full credit · 8 partial · 0 no credit
Explore these test results →

View this model’s answers, code and tool activity →

Reading research papers · Thinking off versus on
Thinking off → on0.0/100 · Answer token F1 → 45.5/100 · Answer token F1
Paired test coverage8 of 8 tasks compared in both modes
Tasks timed in both modes8 pairs
Score change with thinking on+45.5 score points
Explore these test results →

View this model’s answers, code and tool activity →

Can abandon a source-backed answer under pressure. In the examples checked, thinking-on responses switched to unsupported alternatives; verify changes against the source rather than assuming extra reasoning protects against misleading corrections.

Evidence for this judgment

Example 1: Resisting incorrect corrections
Thinking on. Final result: no credit. A final score does not describe every tool step; this example supports a behavior observation, not a whole-test conclusion.
View the question and recorded answer →

Example 2: Resisting incorrect corrections
Thinking on. Final result: no credit. A final score does not describe every tool step; this example supports a behavior observation, not a whole-test conclusion.
View the question and recorded answer →

Should you enable thinking?

Leave thinking off for everyday coding: paired tests showed unchanged success with longer average task time. Thinking also added substantial delay without improving overall compliance with strict wording and formatting instructions.

Evidence for this judgment
Everyday coding tasks · Thinking off versus on
Thinking off → on100.0% · Task pass rate → 100.0% · Task pass rate
Paired test coverage16 of 16 tasks compared in both modes
Tasks timed in both modes16 pairs
Score change with thinking onNo change
Average time change with thinking on7.2 seconds slower
Explore these test results →

View this model’s answers, code and tool activity →

Following exact instructions · Thinking off versus on
Thinking off → on87.0% · Strict prompt compliance → 87.0% · Strict prompt compliance
Paired test coverage23 of 23 tasks compared in both modes
Tasks timed in both modes23 pairs
Score change with thinking onNo change
Average time change with thinking on71.4 seconds slower
Explore these test results →

View this model’s answers, code and tool activity →

Enable thinking for larger practical tasks: the substantial quality improvement came with a small average delay. For finding answers in passages, it improved accuracy too, but the extra waiting time was more substantial.

Evidence for this judgment
Larger practical tasks · Thinking off versus on
Thinking off → on54.5/100 · Mean task credit → 90.9/100 · Mean task credit
Paired test coverage11 of 11 tasks compared in both modes
Tasks timed in both modes11 pairs
Score change with thinking on+36.4 score points
Average time change with thinking on15.0 seconds slower
Explore these test results →

View this model’s answers, code and tool activity →

Reading without guessing · Thinking off versus on
Thinking off → on81.3% · Exact-match accuracy → 93.8% · Exact-match accuracy
Paired test coverage16 of 16 tasks compared in both modes
Tasks timed in both modes16 pairs
Score change with thinking on+12.5 score points
Average time change with thinking on36.0 seconds slower
Explore these test results →

View this model’s answers, code and tool activity →

Worth knowing

Publication redactions, linked-only paper text and withheld practical-task artifacts limit readers’ ability to inspect some examples.

Evidence for this judgment

Source limitation
Some selected evidence has recorded publication redactions.

How to interpret these assessments and their limitations →

One weight format is recorded for this model. Additional tested formats will appear here when available.

Thinking tradeoff

16/16 matched scored questions · 16/16 matched timed questions

Both modes earned full credit on every matched question. These matched results leave no measured quality headroom; unmatched questions are not covered by this observation.

Thinking offMean matched task credit100.0%
Thinking onMean matched task credit100.0%

Thinking on took 7.2 seconds more per matched timed question, on average.

All matched quality and timing measurements
Matched measurementRecorded result
Average credit, off → on100.0% → 100.0%
Mean paired credit change0.0 percentage points
Question outcomes0 improved · 16 unchanged · 0 worse
Mean added task time+7.2s
Mean task time, off → on13.9s → 21.1s
Median task time, off → on12.8s → 17.9s
Median of paired time changes+6.2s
Total added task time+115.4s
Ratio of summed times, on / off1.5×

Quality and timing can cover different subsets. Median paired change is calculated per question; it is not the difference between the two medians. Task time includes tools and grading.

Inspect the matched modes and their answers →
Inspect individual matched questions

Sampled repetitions

Repeated runs are a separate experiment and never add votes to the baseline score.

Thinking on · temperature 0.6

48/48 repeats scored · 48 full-credit repeats.

16/16 questions have every planned repeat scored. Of those, 16 earned full credit on every repeat.

Recorded repetition conditions
  • Seed 202 · requested on · verified
  • Seed 303 · requested on · verified
  • Seed 101 · requested on · verified

Everyday coding tasks: recorded outcomes

Find information in a small project, edit files and fix bugs.

16 full credit

Each segment counts tasks, not credit points. Partial credit varies by task.

Scoring and fixed question bank →

This model’s answers, code and tool activity

Select a question to read the original answer, tool calls and available code changes for this configuration and thinking setting.

1–16 of 16 matching questions · 16 in this version

  • Locate the Retry Limit

    The user asks where the project's retry-limit setting is defined and what value it holds. This exercises locating a named setting in code and reporting both its location and value.

    basic-T1 · primary
  • Find the Release Date

    The user asks for the release date mentioned in a project notes document. This exercises reading a specified file and extracting a particular fact rather than guessing from outside knowledge.

    basic-T2 · primary
  • Change the Retry Limit

    The user asks to change the project's retry limit to a specified value. This exercises finding the relevant setting and making a focused code edit rather than merely describing the change.

    basic-T3 · primary
  • Create an Exact One-Line File

    The user asks to create a text file containing exactly one supplied line. This exercises basic file creation and precise instruction following, including avoiding extra text in the file.

    basic-T4 · primary
  • Explain the Latest Commit

    The user asks what the most recent Git commit changed in the project. This exercises inspecting recorded changes and turning them into a clear explanation of what was modified.

    basic-T5 · primary
  • Count and Compare Python Files

    The user asks how many Python files are in the application folder and which is largest. This exercises identifying relevant files, counting them, and comparing their sizes.

    basic-T6 · primary
  • Add Readable Byte Sizes

    The user asks to add a function that converts byte counts into readable sizes and remove the related TODO comment. This exercises implementing a small utility and updating the surrounding code consistently.

    basic-T7 · primary
  • Collect TODO Comments

    The user asks to find every TODO comment in the Python code and append each to the project's task list on a separate line. This combines searching across files with collecting text into an existing document.

    basic-T8 · primary
  • Fix Code Behind a Failing Test

    The user asks to investigate a failing test and fix the application code without changing the test. This exercises diagnosing a bug while respecting an explicit limit on what may be edited.

    basic-H1 · primary
  • Rename a Function Throughout

    The user asks to rename a network function and update every place in the project that uses it. This exercises tracking references across files and making a coordinated change rather than editing only the definition.

    basic-H2 · primary
  • Find the Proxy Settings

    The user asks to find a proxy configuration file somewhere under the project's parent folder and report its host and port. This exercises searching beyond the project folder and reading configuration values.

    basic-H3 · primary
  • Locate an Error in a Log

    The user asks which error code appears in a long event log and on which line. This exercises finding a specific entry in a large file and reporting its precise location.

    basic-H4 · primary
  • Append a Final Task

    The user asks to append a supplied release-related task as the final line of an existing task list. This exercises preserving existing content while adding exact text in the requested position.

    basic-H5 · primary
  • Calculate Total Retry Waiting

    The user asks for the total time a network function spends sleeping when all attempts fail, worked out from the code. This exercises following retry logic and adding the delays along that failure path.

    basic-H6 · primary
  • Document Every Command-Line Option

    The user asks for a project readme listing every command-line option with its help text. This exercises discovering the program's available options and transferring that information into complete, source-grounded documentation.

    basic-H7 · primary
  • Undo a Commit by Editing

    The user asks to undo the latest Git commit's change by editing the file directly, without using Git to make changes. This exercises understanding a previous edit and reversing it under a method constraint.

    basic-H8 · primary
Filters change this list, not the fixed scoring denominator. Search currently covers question IDs, titles and available task explanations. Focus a control to load prompt/outcome search where this edition provides it.

Suggested comparisons

These are starting points for inspection, not claims that one setup is better. Runtime and placement differences remain visible.

Thinking on versus off

Verified requested on/off conditions of the same configuration, matched on the recorded test protocol.

Requested thinking off · Complete compared coverage

Compare these configurations →

Selection rule and evidence IDsPolicy comparisons-v3 · Template verified-thinking-pair
Facts: paired-3a1df7110b87c3566eee3e46
Matching candidate set: paired-3a1df7110b87c3566eee3e46

Qwen3.6 29B REAP Opus distill

Another checkpoint in the same total-parameter band and architecture category, with matching task controls.

Requested thinking on · Complete compared coverage

Compare these configurations →

Selection rule and evidence IDsPolicy comparisons-v3 · Template same-parameter-architecture-matching-controls
Facts: fact-e8904ea75031d6ca51c8c950, fact-715b4dac385ebc58266864e4
Matching candidate set: fact-715b4dac385ebc58266864e4, fact-eab8e02b2ca6f6125554960e, fact-483531924d0e765052461c57, fact-c07386361967c222d8028664, fact-513cdcd418215fb18de91eaf, fact-323b97d3fdf7355dc2770c66, fact-f173b9794ef7b0017910a9bd, fact-c42b6bb6242e9fbbcb40000c, fact-85df5b9585f4e6e43ea084c4, fact-293c9f59094b11858da40443, fact-e33976d73a46b28357f03760, fact-7aafa6cbb04481beb867a2e4, fact-24e468344d64cb03badda736, fact-ea0d7c942a224d49dc767879, fact-bc60b4f12cd6927a928b8266

Tested weights

Q4_K_M · 20.42 GB

ggml-org · recorded source

671e47e0ec53c665d048b98c3ecbfd5236b5ca9c3e02ed19fc8f81f7b85140c7 · Exact GGUF file →Historical first-MiB hash only; not a full-file identity.

Explore the answers

Choose a suite to inspect its exact available questions, references and model answers.